Nmna but I want it

Special edition in this case is actually pretty impressive for the era.

http://columbia.craigslist.org/cto/4824879581.html

I have for sale a 1990 beretta gtz it's 5 speed with the quad 4 as you can see in the pic I'm ask $1000 but the price is negotiable just need car gone. This would be a nice project for a good tuner the car still runs and the motor is still very strong bark tires from first to third gear... The car does need a starter was my daily driver until starter went out. If you have any questions hmu and I answer

The GTZ is rare. I spent a lot of time looking for one, sadly never saw one come up for sale.

One of you buy it so I can take it off your hands in six months.

Oh this is too close . . .

Did he take screenshots of photos he took with his phone?

nocones wrote: Did he take screenshots of photos he took with his phone?

He bought a gtz and actually knows what that means do I am willing to forgive

Starter is less than a hundred regardless of brand on Rockauto.

I love Berettas, they were my favorite car back in the day!

The Quad 4 was the E36 M3 back then.

And its in my town...i don't need it ..but I want to look at it

I was so close in buying a brand new Beretta GTZ back in late 1995. I decided to wait to place an order but I ended up ordering a 1996 Pontiac TA WS6 instead. I know that my Step Dad did not like the Quad 4 engine and was trying to steer me towards a car with a V8. I had a blast test driving it and the salesman let me keep the car over the weekend.

Please tell me the quad 4 is a turd and this car is not worth fooling with !

In reply to scottdownsouth:

I think the Quad 4 is actually a pretty decent engine.

scottdownsouth wrote: Please tell me the quad 4 is a turd and this car is not worth fooling with !

It's a buzzy, noisy, hard to work on turd that made 180hp from 2.3l in the GTZ (GTZ signified 5-speed, autos had a low power engine) at a time when the M3 had a 170ish HP 2.3l.

Also, the rest is standard Beretta, which is, clear of all sarcasm, a pretty crappy car.

The E30 M3 (US) had 192 hp. If you want to find out some Quad 4 info, do a search for the Oldmobile Aerotech.

In reply to Knurled:

Oh come on, the Beretta isn't that crappy, I knew a few girls in High School that drove them.

In reply to SyntheticBlinkerFluid: Dunno, I think there is a reason that GM still uses pushrods

Ever wonder what a Quad4 would have been like if the bumpstick was above the valves?

I saw some really fast versions in Midgets...

Inch for inch an Autocraft Vee Wee would smoke it though.

In reply to bentwrench:

The cams are over the valves in a quad 4.

Knurled wrote:

scottdownsouth wrote: Please tell me the quad 4 is a turd and this car is not worth fooling with !

It's a buzzy, noisy, hard to work on turd that made 180hp from 2.3l in the GTZ (GTZ signified 5-speed, autos had a low power engine) at a time when the M3 had a 170ish HP 2.3l.

So GM's econobox motor was making similar power to the M3 then? I don't know why you would say they're hard to work on. They're pretty straightforward. I liked both the Q4 and the TC. They we're capable and easily modded.

I had a love hate relationship with my GTZ, I loved it until I cracked the head... Quad 4s are not cheap engines to randomly find. The temp gauge was a dummy at best, the car fully overheated and the needle barely moved off the normal zone.

He dropped the price to $600.

He answerd my email saying the interior was rough but everything else is fine. Anyone want to ride out there with me and s starter?

Limme know what time and day.

There is a white one of these near my work, I have no clue if it's for sale, but when I saw it I had to do a double take, I haven't seen a GTZ in a very long time.

The Quad 4 wasn't their econobox motor at that time. It was their hot 4.

The econobox motors were the SOHC 2.0 and the Iron Duke.

The Quad 4 wasn't demoted to econobox duty until the late 90's when it was detuned and balance shafted to about 145 hp to stick in the base model Grand Am and Achieva.

Looks like it sold