NMWWKM= NOT MINE, WIFE WOULD KILL ME
http://syracuse.craigslist.org/pts/5902460615.html
Interested in learning where you chaps would stuff this boosted lump.
NMWWKM= NOT MINE, WIFE WOULD KILL ME
http://syracuse.craigslist.org/pts/5902460615.html
Interested in learning where you chaps would stuff this boosted lump.
Might be fun in my NB, but I think I'd prefer the FoST 2.0
Man, there was a Focus SVT locally with a blown engine for under $1000. For challenge money, you'd really have something.
Depends.......
Can that be made to power the correct (rear) wheels?
Indy-Guy wrote: Depends....... Can that be made to power the correct (rear) wheels?
Where's Robbie and his X1/9?
In reply to EvanB:
I'd rock that in a New York minute!
alfadriver wrote:Indy-Guy wrote: Depends....... Can that be made to power the correct (rear) wheels?Where's Robbie and his X1/9?
I was gonna say... Just put it midship.
Figure out how to hook it up to a RWD transmission and drop it in my '73 SR5 Corolla.
Locost
That's a different bolt pattern than the NC/Duratec. That said, it shares the same pattern as the old Zetec/2.0 Pinto. So, with some careful shopping, it should be rwdoable.
I thought it was the Sigma bellhousing pattern?
Edit- it looks like in UK engine nomencalture, Sigma or Zetec-SE is the very typical Zetec pattern with the starter above the crank and Zetec-E is the below crank version.
I could finally upgrade the Mazda 2 to Mazdaspeed 2 status! 
1st gen MR2. Would be an absolute wiring nightmare getting around the connections the ecu sees to chassis systems.
A pinto, maverick, or a falcon, too.
I've wanted to put one in a Ranger.
Mazda GLC or Toyota Starlet
mk1 Ford Capri.
Duh.
You'll need to log in to post.
