So we tried RivalS1.5's
The general consensus of 'people', vastly simplified, is that RivalS are the most difficult 200TW tire to get heat into but *should* be faster on a good hot day on concrete than the Nexens we run now or the Bridgestones we ran previously. So when the opportunity arose, I wanted to give them a try.
Turns out I am not fond of them. At all. Hell no. Something about them doesn't mesh with my setup and/or driving preferences and I never felt confident on them.
Over the course of 8 runs, we varied tire pressure across a 10 psi range, along with rebound and compression changes across a wide range. No luck getting the front of the car to bite consistently nor the rear of the car to stick in transition as desired.
The weather was sunny, dry and 75*. Two drivers. That ought to be good enough to get heat into any tire I want to use, as March-June and Sept-Nov are typically cooler than that anyway. Only a 45 minute lunch break between sessions, in the middle of the day - course and temps were the same for both tires.
Nexens: 48.274 48.022 47.204 46.618+1 (3rd run was FTD, 4th run if clean would have won PAX.)
RivalS: 48.302+2 47.672+2 47.498+2 47.880
Codriver RivalS times: 52.310 50.376 49.960+2 49.336+2
We won't be running the car on concrete until Nats 2018. Showing up with a well developed car on Nexens has got to be a better decision than struggling all season to get enough heat into RivalS to trust them, nevermind build a setup around them. Screw that. I'll put Rivals on the car as soon as it loses to an STS Miata that has them. Hasn't happened yet.