mazdeuce - Seth said:
In reply to docwyte :
We've been discussing how to deal with the rear of the car chatting off the forum. A wing is the super cool choice, but only if a spoiler won't do the job.
First I need to figure out if I can reasonably drive around with [the front splitter], then I need to figure out how out of balance the car is, then I need to bring it back in balance.
There's a very real, non-zero chance that all you need is a rear diffuser, and we balance with what we can get out of the front. no wing, no spoiler necessary... unless we want to try and have "all the downforce" for the skid pad and autocross...
stafford1500 said:
If you want balance tunability and possible street clearance, place a piano hinge just ahead of your 2*4 mounting blocks. Raise the leading edge to get more street clearance and tune from flat toward nose up for balance at the track. You will find a happy spot quickly. Also adds some bending strength across the span
[...]
Dont run the fences out past the wheel opening edge more than about 1" because the drag adds up fast. If you had more motor then you could get by with more extension. More extensionwill get you front grip pretty fast too, just draggy grip
this, with my comment above brings up the question of whether we want three configurations...
- Low Drag - Brainerd Long, NCM Full, Road America, and Drags (places where we'll get into 5th, or where weight/drag is a penalty)
- Medium Downforce - Nelson, Blackhawk, Hastings and the shorter Brainerd/NCM courses (courses mainly in 3rd/4th)
- AllTheDownforce - Skid pads, autocross (shorter courses mainly in 2nd/3rd)
that's part of why I'm thinking of going "short" to the bumper in the front, and wide on the sides... then we may not need as tall of a rear "flap" / "gurney" to get the flow turning we need. I.e. more area, less camber = less drag for same downforce.
stafford1500 said:
Drop me a message if you want to pick my brain. Also, Sleepyhead knows whats up.
I do, and I don't. Most of my past coursework, was around much simpler flow environments... and my former job was less aerodynamics. Although, there is some irony that I wrote a paper as part of my senior design about flat-bottomed airfoils in low-RE environment... and now I'm playing around with constant thickness "flat airfoils" in a similar RE environment. So, in some regards, I'm bumbling around loaded with enough information to be dangerous, but not enough practical experience to be confident (not that anything is particularly 'certain' when it comes to Aero).