Boost_Crazy said:
It looks more like they adapted the Station turbo to a Montero engine. It looks carb'ed instead of throttle body injected, and they left the water cooling off the turbo.
That said, a well set up turbo 2.6 should be a real good motor for that thing. The Starion 2.6 got a lot of flak because it was not a very sporting motor- it was a truck motor with a turbo strapped to it. But it makes a lot torque, should be great for a small 4x4. The injectors were an issue along with the jet valves in the heads. There is a block off kit for the jet valves that can be installed by just removing the valve cover. I was surprisingly impressed with the engine in my Lemon's Starion. So much torque, it didn't matter much which gear you were in, it just pulled.
The jet valves themselves aren't really the issue, blocking them doesn't solve the cracking in that area I don't believe. They crack due to the steel sleeve the jet valves are installed in, so blocking them off won't fix that issue. You would need to totally remove the steel sleeve, or buy a head without the jet valves to really be bulletproof to cracking. Or, just be careful and don't overheat the engine! Fix any issues that may cause it to overheat; re-rod the radiator, replace waterpump, etc.
There are some aftermarket companies that make heads without jet valves, and some OEM applications that didn't have the jet valves at all (and even some with hydraulic lifters, fancy)!
https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-g54b-head-development/
Good info here, the 2.6 came in ALL kinds of vehicles and lots of mopars, so there is plenty of development work done on them. If you have the 5spd, going to higher power might be a bad idea, the 4spd auto are much more durable.
https://www.allpar.com/threads/the-mitsubishi-2-6-liter-engine.228993/
Turbocharging the 2.6
Saw your brief personal note about turbocharging the Dodge/Mitsu 2.6 for a truck. I have built a turbo Dodge D-50 4wd 5spd. using an 85 Mitsu Starion turbo set up, fuel injection, wiring harness, intake and exhaust manifold. Yes, the Starion FI system is a little cranky, and the FI control system is not the best Starion system available (probably the worst), but the donor car was only $300 complete. I added an aftermarket head (AMC) with a thicker deck, more cooling passages, and NO JET VALVES. This truck ran like a scalded dog with stock engine specs.
I am currently building an 87 Dodge Raider 4wd 4spd auto with an 89 Dodge Conquest FI and intercooled turbo. in both cases I used the stock computer and wiring harnesses. The biggest problems with the swap were the oil pan (the Starion/Conquest pans won't fit due to interference with the front differential, and the stock truck pans don't have the fittings for or have the fittings in the wrong place for the turbo oil lines and dipstick. I solved this one by cutting the fittings out of the turbo pans and welding them into the truck pan.
The only other problems were with the wiring harnesses mating up for stuff like 12V power and speed sensor connections. The turbo down pipe and catalysts fit under the truck, and are only about 2" too long to bolt straight up to the truck exhaust. This was another simple welding fix. The oil pickup tube in the pan had to be extended about 3/4" to have the correct reach. I used the stock turbo oil cooler, re-cored the radiator, and will use the stock intercooler on the Raider. Future plans include a custom multiport intake and programmable FI control system, probably a Simple Digital Systems FI and ignition timing controller.
As engine swaps go, this one is very simple. I have no experience with this swap in FWD cars, and do not recommend it due to suspected driveline weakness. I am also reluctant to recommend it for manual transmission trucks, as I have had a transmission failure in the D-50 (which may not be torque load related). The folks at Mitsu customer service asked some questions of the teck folks, and assure me that the 4spd auto in the Raider will handle the 250-300 ft.lbs. of torque the modified turbo engine will produce. This leaves only a few RWD 2.6 cars and a fairly large number of trucks and SUV's as candidates. I'll be happy to answer any questions I can.