Toyman01
Toyman01 GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/23/15 1:43 p.m.

Seemed kind of cheap to me.

NMNA

http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/4903529774.html

Toyman01
Toyman01 GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/23/15 1:43 p.m.

Never mind, it's an autotragic.

Sine_Qua_Non
Sine_Qua_Non Dork
2/23/15 1:47 p.m.
Toyman01 wrote: Never mind, it's an autotragic.

That means it's still priced too high

BoxheadTim
BoxheadTim GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
2/23/15 2:05 p.m.

You can pick up early 2.5 manuals for that money, that's pretty much going rate.

markwemple
markwemple HalfDork
2/23/15 3:56 p.m.

Better off with the later 2.7 cars. Better reliability. Just like the 996/2, there is a noticable gap between the 2. Now, as for price, you should be able to get a 100k+ Boxster for 10k or less. And hte more miles the better. The m96 loves miles.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
Cc9LkQ3k86x4zfmlWEm4KhSErYKN28dTqdciLdvqx223INxprAprwZ248vKXvyYg