JamesMcD wrote: In reply to 92CelicaHalfTrac: Put an F2T and B2200 trans in it.
I believe that would be easier in an FC RX7 and the RX7 looks and handles better anyways. 
JamesMcD wrote: In reply to 92CelicaHalfTrac: Put an F2T and B2200 trans in it.
I believe that would be easier in an FC RX7 and the RX7 looks and handles better anyways.
But that's been done.
My ex and I had a Datsun 200SX in the 80s. I loved that car... until the cat wizzed in it.
JamesMcD wrote: But that's been done.
Yeah, a couple times, and that falls right in line with my pretty woefully bad mechanic abilities.
Japanese Classic Car Show - 2010.
(hug)
there you go.
what no pulsar love?
internetautomart wrote: what no pulsar love?
I only have so much love to give...
ca18de ALMOST makes up for them being fwd. but not quite.
belteshazzar wrote: ca18de ALMOST makes up for them being fwd. but not quite.
they're rwd....
stealthfighter1 wrote:belteshazzar wrote: ca18de ALMOST makes up for them being fwd. but not quite.they're rwd....
Yeah, that's what made me ask in the first place. They're so similar to the AE86- better looking I think and with more interesting power available- yet one is an icon and the other forgotten.
pulsars are not rwd. they're not. they definitely are not.
no, not pulsars , did they ever come with a ca18de?
In the US, I believe it was the ca18et sohc turbo
pete240z wrote: Japanese Classic Car Show - 2010.
Man I am a sucker for a good coupe. S12, S13, Fox Body. I'd take any of em' over a comparable hatch.
you're not the only one
belteshazzar wrote: pulsars are not rwd. they're not. they definitely are not.
Ah. I got confused... again.
Nitroracer wrote: Man I am a sucker for a good coupe. S12, S13, Fox Body. I'd take any of em' over a comparable hatch.
+1 Not to mention they're lighter and more rigid.
belteshazzar wrote: pulsars are not rwd. they're not. they definitely are not.
I thought the transformer body style was. Meh, guess my mind is going since I never owned one.
In reply to Nitroracer:
Roger that on that S12 coupe. I don't think I've ever seen one in person . . .
This was my 1985 Nissan 200SX SE, non-turbo, 5-speed, base model I owned from 1985-1994. Since it had the IRS; it had that Nissan "squat" under full acceleration. This baby ran flawless for 135,000 miles. I bought the 1600 in 1990 and sold it in 1995.
pulsars are a sentra, & were available with a non-turbo ca16de & ca18de.
Relatively nice looking 87 V6 model on ebay now. I may even bid.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1987-NISSAN-200SX-SEV6-5-SPEED-/320650370135?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item4aa8405c57
-C
In reply to Mazdax605:
I've got an appt. to check it out this week
Actually I always lusted after the first generation 200SX... http://www.nissanforums.com/classic-datsun/145217-1978-datsun-200sx-putting-back-road.html
I has a B210 that I drove the heck out of in high school... always wanted to HIPO 200SX version. I actually talked a buddy into buying one and (except for being more claustrophobic than the B210) it was every bit as fun as I had thought it would be... at least until my non-enthusiast buddy ran it out of oil...
You'll need to log in to post.
