captdownshift wrote: In reply to mazdeuce: I honestly feel that most concerns regarding rolls (which are normally "soft" rolls when at a rallycross) are due in part to having a tight course design that mirrors a traditional autocross course opposed to attempting to simulate a lower speed stage rally course. Trying to strike a balance that allows a course to be free and flowing, allowing several different lines to work, while still managing to keep speeds down enough that it isn't a 70mph romp is the challenge and key. Making it too constricted with overly tight slaloms and box turns is a recipe for low speed rolls. I'm not saying, or even suggesting that it was the case at the event but rather just making a general statement regarding to course design in prevention regardless of surface condition.
I totally agree with you here. In WDCR we run courses that are meant to simulate stage rally, definitely NOT autocross courses. Some people who see my vids say "well you guys just have a bunch of offsets and slaloms and not enough tight turns," but everyone who runs our courses loves them....high-speed, flowing, fun. I love our setups. If I wanted to do autocross, I'd do autocross. Even when we get rutted turns, I've never seen any car even come close to rolling, or even getting on two wheels that I can ever remember. I think WDCR has only ever had one car roll, and it was 5-6 years ago and apparently a driver mistake, not a course problem.
The GLDiv National challenge was a nice blend of a rally-feeling course with a few quick technical elements more like an autocross, IMO. I think everyone really liked those courses.