"...this autocross car literally owns the curves! "
I would like to see the documentation that supports this assertion.
"...this autocross car literally owns the curves! "
I would like to see the documentation that supports this assertion.
alex wrote: "...this autocross car literally owns the curves! " I would like to see the documentation that supports this assertion.
+1. No misuse of the English language is as unforgivable as the misuse of "literally".
ReverendDexter wrote:alex wrote: "...this autocross car literally owns the curves! " I would like to see the documentation that supports this assertion.+1. No misuse of the English language is as unforgivable as the misuse of "literally".
+1 to you good sir. I have a boss who abuses literally, and it literally makes my head explode every time!
JG Pasterjak wrote: That's cool. That was David's first project car when he started working here. jg
Yep, I remember that car.
ReverendDexter wrote:alex wrote: "...this autocross car literally owns the curves! " I would like to see the documentation that supports this assertion.+1. No misuse of the English language is as unforgivable as the misuse of "literally".
The gross misuse of the phrase "Case in point" bothers me more.
poopshovel wrote:ReverendDexter wrote:The gross misuse of the phrase "Case in point" bothers me more.alex wrote: "...this autocross car literally owns the curves! " I would like to see the documentation that supports this assertion.+1. No misuse of the English language is as unforgivable as the misuse of "literally".
Case in point
You'll need to log in to post.