oldtin wrote: On the dreadful side:
Damn, I thought I knew all about British kit cars from the 80's, but I don't recognize that. It may not win a beuty contest, but I'd rock it as a track toy if the underpinnings are any good. What is it?
oldtin wrote: On the dreadful side:
Damn, I thought I knew all about British kit cars from the 80's, but I don't recognize that. It may not win a beuty contest, but I'd rock it as a track toy if the underpinnings are any good. What is it?
oldtin wrote: On the dreadful side:
What was that thing called on Sesame Street, a "snuffaluffagus?"
kb58 wrote:oldtin wrote: On the dreadful side:What was that thing called on Sesame Street, a "snuffaluffagus?"
with faux fur, I see a lemons theme
I'm biased becaeu it was mine and I built it, but this:
Corvette chassis, with suspension mods and a built 350 made it quicker to over 100 mph than an original one and actually handled great, too (I autocrossed it a couple times). It was 400 lbs lighter than the Corvette it was based on. Turned heads like crazy when I built it (back in '85. I owned it until '88, and it was the advertising for my custom car/fabrication shop)
THAT is a georgeous machine. What's this thing called??
Chris_V wrote: I'm biased becaeu it was mine and I built it, but this: Corvette chassis, with suspension mods and a built 350 made it quicker to over 100 mph than an original one and actually handled great, too (I autocrossed it a couple times). It was 400 lbs lighter than the Corvette it was based on. Turned heads like crazy when I built it (back in '85. I owned it until '88, and it was the advertising for my custom car/fabrication shop)
JoeyM wrote: the factory five '33 is wonderful
Unfortunately the poster-child for the FFR 33, the Ridetech car, is over $305,000.
Javelin wrote:JoeyM wrote: the factory five '33 is wonderfulUnfortunately the poster-child for the FFR 33, the Ridetech car, is over $305,000. http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicles/hrdp_1307_no_bull_ride_tech_1933_factory_five_hot_rod/viewall.html
Even if you could build the FF car for $45K, I would not be able to afford it. My non-kit replica is over $20XX budget, but probably not by much. (I would guess I'm around ~$2500, but stopped keeping receipts, so I can't say for sure.....I haven't had to buy anything in a long time, though.) I have a few expensive things planned (having the interior and belly coated with bedliner, having a convertible top made) but expect to still end up relatively cheap.
My '32 will never look or handle as nice as the FF '33, but I'll be able to afford it. I'd rather drive than sit and watch someone else do it.
About the time this thread came up, one of my co-workers decided he wanted to jump from one end of the spectrum on kit cars to the other - not exactly from worst to best, but certainly from bad to good.
He has an Invader GT that he bought for a parts donor for a sand rail. Looks sort of like this but in much worse shape.
In addition to looking like a duck-billed platypus on wheels, the body appears to contain more plywood than fiberglass. Mechanicals are pretty much stock VW. A typical example of a questionable Beetle kit car.
Now, he's selling the shell and several other projects to buy an Exocet.
mattmacklind wrote: Actually, even though its another Cobra and the ride height is a little off, the Cal-Ace wasn't too bad all things considered:
I see an MGB in drag
oldtin wrote: On the dreadful side:
Without the roof that thing is not too terrible in an old race car sort of way...
Just what is it?
noddaz wrote:oldtin wrote: On the dreadful side:Without the roof that thing is not too terrible in an old race car sort of way... Just what is it?
with better lights.. it probably would not look too bad. The hardtop would definatly either have to go or get rounded off into a proper 935esque top
mad_machine wrote:mattmacklind wrote: Actually, even though its another Cobra and the ride height is a little off, the Cal-Ace wasn't too bad all things considered:I see an MGB in drag
That would be the all things considered part...
I'm not sure what it is either, but I've been looking for it- it's slowly growing on me. Kind of reminds me of a spec racer Ford without curves.
Here's another one for the yuck-o-meter...
http://www.pistonheads.com/news/images/6131-07.JPG
mad_machine wrote:noddaz wrote:with better lights.. it probably would not look too bad. The hardtop would definatly either have to go or get rounded off into a proper 935esque topoldtin wrote: On the dreadful side:Without the roof that thing is not too terrible in an old race car sort of way... Just what is it?
mattmacklind wrote: Best ever: Close second: Honorable mention for the Trike in Mad Max. Actually, even though its another Cobra and the ride height is a little off, the Cal-Ace wasn't too bad all things considered:
A friend of mine has a Brubaker, and owns the molds to make the body. Big VW guy, obviously
We should make a clear distinction between kits that are/are not:
1) Ugly
2) Good Performers
3) Hard to build
4) Painful to own/operate when done
Does a full Miata FM kit that you DIY qualify?
If so, gotta be really high up there (on the GOOD side)
Couple of fast comments:
1) VW-based kits weren't bad if you used the late chassis with the IRS and ball joint front end.
2) Please - somebody post a photo of a Kelmark GT - can't believe no one has done this yet.
It's my understanding Noble made a V8 powered copy of the Ferrari P4 that was very nice, but they only made a couple before they went under.
For a street card, the GT40 clones are driveable for big guys because the driver's compartment goes all the way to the side of the car, but most of the "glasshouse" cars (e.g. the Ultima and 917/T70) are far too small for shoulder/leg/head room.
You'll need to log in to post.