1 2
Burrito
Burrito Dork
6/28/16 12:37 p.m.

In reply to Trackmouse:

21k gets you into a Veloster Turbo. I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing, thought.

GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
6/28/16 12:43 p.m.
pinchvalve wrote: Kia Forte coupe will do 6.9, but the turbo motor puts you $300 north of 20K.

This is actually one I was thinking about, didn't realize they were that quick!

Trackmouse
Trackmouse Dork
6/28/16 12:45 p.m.

Looking for something in that range that beats our 2011 fit. It's slow and living in the land of highways filled with slack jawed hippies that go a CONSISTENT 10mph under whatever speed limit is posted means there are lots of passing opportunities.

Trackmouse
Trackmouse Dork
6/28/16 12:48 p.m.
Burrito wrote: In reply to Trackmouse: 21k gets you into a Veloster Turbo. I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing, thought.

Reviews haven't been good for that car, as much as I want it.

KyAllroad
KyAllroad UltraDork
6/28/16 12:55 p.m.
Trackmouse wrote: Looking for something in that range that beats our 2011 fit. It's slow and living in the land of highways filled with slack jawed hippies that go a CONSISTENT 10mph under whatever speed limit is posted means there are lots of passing opportunities.

I suppose then the other half of that question is "why brand new?" A two year old Altima 3.5 would be a rocket-ship compared with a new econobox and a quick check says I can get a 2014 for $12,999.

Depreciation can be your friend my friend.

bmw88rider
bmw88rider GRM+ Memberand Dork
6/28/16 1:01 p.m.

Sounds like a great job for the FiST. Currently a $1000 rebate on it so with no negotiating skills at all you are out the door for $20ish K

Trackmouse
Trackmouse Dork
6/28/16 1:08 p.m.

In reply to KyAllroad:

I agree. But it's for swmbo. So needs to be care free and not getting stranded due to negligence from the PO (which I can assume every idiot with a license doesn't take care of theirs).

Andy Neuman
Andy Neuman HalfDork
6/28/16 1:15 p.m.

FiST or it looks like v6 mustangs can be had for under 21k I've even seen some listed under 20k.

Rusted_Busted_Spit
Rusted_Busted_Spit GRM+ Memberand UberDork
6/28/16 1:30 p.m.

When my 9-5 was totalled in May I came very close to getting a Forte5 with the turbo. I had the dealer talked into 21,300 down from 26K for a fully loaded sx, you can find ones without leather seats under 20K.

ProDarwin
ProDarwin PowerDork
6/28/16 3:29 p.m.
Trackmouse wrote: In reply to KyAllroad: I agree. But it's for swmbo. So needs to be care free and not getting stranded due to negligence from the PO (which I can assume every idiot with a license doesn't take care of theirs).

Buy a year or two old Camry V6? Its going to be a solid second faster to 60 than any new car mentioned thus far. And probably more reliable in the long run than many of them.

I know "Camry" is a bad word on this forum, but its not a bad tool for the job.

drainoil
drainoil HalfDork
6/28/16 6:29 p.m.

It's a shame that even a stripped full size truck can't be had under this price point.

Trackmouse
Trackmouse Dork
6/28/16 7:03 p.m.

Really want to keep it sub compact here. For the mileage.

dean1484
dean1484 GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
6/28/16 7:09 p.m.
ProDarwin
ProDarwin PowerDork
6/28/16 7:20 p.m.
Trackmouse wrote: Really want to keep it sub compact here. For the mileage.

Thought you said it was highway driving? Most sub-compacts won't get any better mileage there than a mid size, especially fast ones.

Vigo
Vigo PowerDork
6/28/16 8:43 p.m.

New civic is quicker than mentioned earlier: 0-60 6.8s for the CVT.

http://forums.motortrend.com/70/9741680/the-general-forum/2016-civic-first-tests-15t-cvt-goes-0-60-in-68-sec/index.html

fireball123
fireball123 Reader
6/28/16 9:18 p.m.
ProDarwin wrote:
Trackmouse wrote: In reply to KyAllroad: I agree. But it's for swmbo. So needs to be care free and not getting stranded due to negligence from the PO (which I can assume every idiot with a license doesn't take care of theirs).
Buy a year or two old Camry V6? Its going to be a solid second faster to 60 than any new car mentioned thus far. And probably more reliable in the long run than many of them. I know "Camry" is a bad word on this forum, but its not a bad tool for the job.

wouldn't you rather have an accord v6

ProDarwin
ProDarwin PowerDork
6/28/16 9:28 p.m.
fireball123 wrote: wouldn't you rather have an accord v6

I'm not sure I'd care. They are both roughly the same speed. Both are auto-only in the 4 door. Accord no longer has fancypants double wishbones. Which is cheaper?

Same goes for the Altima.

Trackmouse
Trackmouse Dork
6/28/16 9:41 p.m.

Did this turn into a what car thread? Also, wife informed me she wants auto. Been looking into those velosters, pretty tempting.

sanman
sanman HalfDork
6/28/16 10:17 p.m.

In reply to Andy Neuman:

I've been seeing base v6 mustangs (base model) for under $20k. Strong contender for my next car.

Trackmouse
Trackmouse Dork
6/28/16 10:21 p.m.

So the cheapest horsepower money can buy (new) is the v6 cramit. That's tempting also.

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
vFeKpohSq3JxLGbgZGJddAAqczMA2dcixYBtXFg0JHZetAgflz1RVZZBsq4g420R