carguy123 wrote:
College Station isn't really on any major highways and doesn't have easy access to anywhere...
First, I hope I'm wrong about Austin being too far to draw a crowd, but I'm still going to have to do more BS-calling. College Station is easier/quicker to get to from Houston. It's about a wash from Dallas. Fort Worth to Austin and San Antonio to Austin are easier than going to College Station. Austin has a slight edge in geographic proximity/access, but not by much.
Besides, my point was more about attracting local spectators. A huge advantage TWS had was that it was hosting Indy Cars and NASCAR, which the natives so thoroughly love. If you can't get Joe Redneck so schlep down to College Station to watch NASCAR, I doubt you'll get him to schlep down to Austin to watch that furrin' racin'.
As for the three dozen "sophisticated" race fans, yeah, they might like Austin better, but half of them would fly to Indy or wherever else to watch the race. My point is that it isn't going to draw that big from the Houston/DFW, etc.--other than the race fans that would make the trek anywhere. Being in Austin isn't going to be a big draw to anyone not otherwise predisposed to attend an F1 race.
carguy123 wrote:
... so you can't really compare it to Austin....
I just did.
carguy123 wrote:
...nor can you compare TWS to an F1 quality track.
That's true. You can pass at TWS, unlike the snooze-fest that is a modern Tilke-designed parade ground. Back in its day TWS was quite the facility. It's dated now, but it failed as a top-level circuit 30 years ago, when it was much closer to being state-of-the-art. The reason it failed wasn't so much the track as all the rest of the facilities, and that in trying not to be too far from anywhere they wound up being too far from everywhere.
carguy123 wrote:
I can see ALMS or Daytona Prototypes in the tracks future as well.
Maybe, but Houston couldn't generate sufficient interest to keep an ALMS race in the absence of the CART race it supported. DFW also couldn't keep an ALMS race, although having it in August was probably not the most clever thing they could have done. Personally, I'd rather watch paint dry than Daytona Prototypes, but they may have some draw with the NASCAR crowd. In either case, history suggests that neither Houston nor Dallas can support such a race. I don't see a race that is 150 miles from either succeeding.
Don't get me wrong, though. I'm excited and hope it succeeds. But all the smug Austin-lovers need to get over themselves and realize this location is all about where the money flowed to Bernie from and has nothing whatsoever to do with Austin being somehow a superior venue for an F1 race. That's all just sunshine being blown up the skirt of the locals so they won't riot about the construction, environmental impact, and all the infrastructure the city and county are going to have to build despite the promises of "no taxpayer money."