I was watching The Peoples Court this afternoon and there was a guy on there suing the dealership where he had just bought a car. (Yeah, I know, nothing new there.) He had traded in a Dodge Caliber (off lease) for a new Mitsubishi Galant.
I was watching The Peoples Court this afternoon and there was a guy on there suing the dealership where he had just bought a car. (Yeah, I know, nothing new there.) He had traded in a Dodge Caliber (off lease) for a new Mitsubishi Galant.
Did the judge smack in the back of his obviously tiny head with his gavel and ask WTF he was doing leasing any vehicle, let alone a Caliber or a Galant?
Umm.. Was he upset that he couldn't hear the suspension moving under him with his new car?
so what was the verdict?... easily entertained minds want to know.
So why was he sueing ?
He was suing because the Mitsu dealer "promised" to make the last 3 lease payments and pay any excess mileage charges on the Caliber. The amount was nearly $1400. The GM for the dealership tried to tell the judge (gee, I love Judge Milian(?) that the only agreement they had was to wash the car....because it was a snowy day when he picked up the car. The GM lost because the "proof" he had that the Galant customer was "okay" with the Mitsu dealership NOT paying the payments/mileage charges....WASN'T signed by the customer. Salesman's goof?
would have been better if they had tried to forge the customer's signiture
A car dealer here got forcibly shut down for doing things like that, among other things.
You'll need to log in to post.
