1 2
jstein77
jstein77 Dork
3/29/13 5:33 p.m.

Yes, I agree with that choice, obviously: However, it looks like the editing of the subsequent text might have been a bit overzealous. The 0-60 time of 8.7 seconds and base price of $7500 quoted for the Turbo actually belonged to the non-turbo GLH. The Turbo was about $9500 and did 0-60 in 7.5 seconds.

kreb
kreb GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
3/29/13 6:36 p.m.

Funny, they seemed so fast at the time.

jstein77
jstein77 Dork
3/29/13 9:01 p.m.

They were, for the day. The GLH Turbo was the fastest car in Dodge's fleet of 1985. There were several autocrosses that I had the fastest stock time that year, besting even the A Stock cars. In impromptu street stoplight drags, I outran things such as Camaros and Porsche 928's.

kb58
kb58 HalfDork
3/29/13 9:14 p.m.

Yeah it's funny how "fast" keeps shifting. I remember an article in either GRM or R&T where a Honda Odyssey minivan was run against a couple "sports cars" of their day and trounced them...

jstein77
jstein77 Dork
3/29/13 9:24 p.m.

That was GRM, and the cars were a Jag E Type and a Porsche 356.

MrJoshua
MrJoshua PowerDork
3/29/13 10:28 p.m.

Trounced by an Oddity.

2K4Kcsq
2K4Kcsq Reader
3/29/13 10:36 p.m.

since we are talking about the GLH, what did the turbo caravans of the era run back then??

BoneYard_Racing
BoneYard_Racing Reader
3/29/13 10:48 p.m.

Nothing remarkable about 146hp through an auto trans. The turbos were suppose to be an economical alternative to a v6

Moparman
Moparman Dork
3/30/13 5:00 a.m.

In reply to BoneYard_Racing:

I know of a few Turbo Caravans running in the 12s and 13s with stock heads and bottom ends. What I would do for a turbo Caravan.

daytonaer
daytonaer HalfDork
3/30/13 5:32 a.m.
2K4Kcsq wrote: since we are talking about the GLH, what did the turbo caravans of the era run back then??

I wish I could find it, I had saved a magazine add for the minivan, it was black with a black turbo van with just the parking lights on and it said "7 passengers, 0-60 in 9 seconds" or something to that effect.

moparman76_69
moparman76_69 HalfDork
3/30/13 5:44 a.m.

Why does it seem like the OP posted this mid conversation? Or did I miss something.

chandlerGTi
chandlerGTi Dork
3/30/13 6:42 a.m.
moparman76_69 wrote: Why does it seem like the OP posted this mid conversation? Or did I miss something.

New grm has a "12 game changers" article.

DrBoost
DrBoost PowerDork
3/30/13 7:27 a.m.

In reply to Moparman: yeah, I thought the same thing.
In reply to Chandler: Oh, that 'splains it. I usually get mine a week after you guys are done discussing the cool articles

jstein77
jstein77 Dork
3/30/13 8:26 a.m.

Yep, just got mine in the mail yesterday.

moparman76_69
moparman76_69 HalfDork
3/30/13 8:33 a.m.

In reply to DrBoost:

Yeah same here

turboswede
turboswede GRM+ Memberand PowerDork
3/30/13 9:09 a.m.
BoneYard_Racing wrote: Nothing remarkable about 146hp through an auto trans. The turbos were suppose to be an economical alternative to a v6

Actually it was because there was a shortage of the Mitsu V6, so Chrysler slammed the 2.5 turbo in the caravan to make up the difference until production could catch up.

2K4Kcsq
2K4Kcsq Reader
3/30/13 9:44 a.m.

I know there are manual trans, caravan turbos around. . . factory built?? or just some guy with a garage and insight?? those ought to run a little closer to the omni i bet. lol

I remember when my friends and i were becoming of driving age, my buddy had an 88 ranger 2wd that we all thought to be a hot rod mini truck. . . till we had our asses handed too us one night by a turbo caravan. . . . it was hilarious, the passenger in the van kept yelling "GOT TURBO!!"

Donebrokeit
Donebrokeit HalfDork
3/30/13 9:50 a.m.

Yes factory build, some came in cargo van version with only a drivers and passengers seat.

iceracer
iceracer UberDork
3/30/13 10:02 a.m.

I have a copy of Road and Track magazine, Nov. 1958. Really interesting to see how things have developed. MG-A Twin Cam. 1588cc. 108hp. 0-60 9.9 sec. top speed 113mph. curb weight 2200 lbs.

ronholm
ronholm HalfDork
3/30/13 10:57 a.m.

In reply to 2K4Kcsq:

This one is a factory 5spd turbo van...

running "unofficially timed" low to mid 14's at the moment.. and still used as a work vehicle... Returns low/nearly mid 20's MPG's loaded...

https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/turbo-5spd-1990-dodge-caribou/55856/page1/

ronholm
ronholm HalfDork
3/30/13 11:00 a.m.
kreb wrote: Funny, they seemed so fast at the time.

forzav12
forzav12 HalfDork
3/30/13 1:00 p.m.

They are still fast. My GLHS still shows its tail lights to the vast majority of today's so-called pocket rockets.

2K4Kcsq
2K4Kcsq Reader
3/31/13 11:23 a.m.
ronholm wrote: In reply to 2K4Kcsq: This one is a factory 5spd turbo van... running "unofficially timed" low to mid 14's at the moment.. and still used as a work vehicle... Returns low/nearly mid 20's MPG's loaded... https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/turbo-5spd-1990-dodge-caribou/55856/page1/

I wouldn't wanna tangle with that caribou!

simply awesome. . . in a hilarious sort of way.

Knurled
Knurled GRM+ Memberand UltraDork
3/31/13 3:14 p.m.

Pleased that I have a photo of 66% of the first page of that article.

 photo GEDC0183.jpg

ultraclyde
ultraclyde Dork
3/31/13 3:49 p.m.

They also quoted the 05 GT mustang as having 240 HP, it was actually rated for 300 flywheel. Still a good article.

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
I1yzxeCnaGfnjuXGENhrL1Pif4ZvZtffjPqAd0QHhqWg9toGQRRPePHXlvSJbVao