Hans device and well endowed ladies?

My wife and I were discussing building up our latest challenge project to do some open track days, and the subject of hans device's came up. Anyone have any experience on how comfortable these are on more well endowed ladies? She kinda cringed at the thought of em, and I really don't want to take the risks of her not having a neck restraint on track.

Any input or suggestions?

I doubt they are any more or less comfortable than the shoulder belts that go along with them.

A Hutchens or D-cell restraint would probably work better than a traditional Hans device.

Of course if you provided pictures we could be more exact with our advise

Might want to check out a Defender.

fiat22turbo wrote: Of course if you provided pictures we could be more exact with our advise

Those pictures are kept for personal use only, thank you very much.

Spinout007 wrote: My wife and I were discussing building up our latest challenge project to do some open track days, and the subject of hans device's came up. Anyone have any experience on how comfortable these are on more well endowed ladies? She kinda cringed at the thought of em, and I really don't want to take the risks of her not having a neck restraint on track. Any input or suggestions?

Awesome way of telling us your wife is well endowed without actually making a post about how your wife is well endowed... ;)

Joey

oh man my wife just saw this thread......now I've gotta explain why I'm talking to random guys on the internet about her "boobs"

Yep, those were pictures of boobs. Yep, I deleted them.

I would suggest that your wife try several head and neck restraint systems on---They really press more against the collarbone and top of the pectoral muscle.

Where are all the photoshopers when I need them?

Per Schroeder wrote: Yep, those were pictures of boobs. Yep, I deleted them.

Per I was trying to keep it clean. At least pg clean.

I'd recommend looking into an Issacs device.

I feel privileged to have seen them before deletion...

Thanks Per. I continue to enjoy what is a remarkably family friendly site. (and magazine...)

Nathan

Family friendly? What could be more family friendly than boobs? Where would the human race be without boobs?

Boobs?

I feel some what ripped off, not having seen the pictures before deletion... Damn... ;)

ansonivan wrote: Family friendly? What could be more family friendly than boobs? Where would the human race be without boobs? Boobs?

seriously.. my 6 month old loves boobs. For food.

lokigti wrote: I feel some what ripped off, not having seen the pictures before deletion... Damn... ;)

Let's just say that they were real, and they were spectacular!!! Not sure on the "real" part, though.

lokigti wrote: I feel some what ripped off, not having seen the pictures before deletion... Damn... ;)

You've probably seen the picture before: a tiny white kitten dwarfed by the mammaries he's sitting between inside of the young lady's form fitting red shirt. If you missed out, google images is your friend.

njansenv wrote: Thanks Per. I continue to enjoy what is a remarkably family friendly site. (and magazine...) Nathan

My family exists mainly due to sex.

I never did understand how boobies equal "bad" but 11 350lb men in tights smashing each other over a ball that isn't even round equals family entertainment.

Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote: My family exists mainly due to sex. I never did understand how boobies equal "bad" but 11 350lb men in tights smashing each other over a ball that isn't even round equals family entertainment.

Not to mention how many times they slap each other on the butt.

And what do you mean by "mainly"?

That's the last time I go away for the weekend and leave the computer home.

Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote:

njansenv wrote: Thanks Per. I continue to enjoy what is a remarkably family friendly site. (and magazine...) Nathan

My family exists mainly due to sex. I never did understand how boobies equal "bad" but 11 350lb men in tights smashing each other over a ball that isn't even round equals family entertainment.

:) I hear you, and I didn't want to get into it here...but there's a time and place IMHO.
Again, IMHO, the GRM forum ain't it.

Nathan

Spinout007 wrote: oh man my wife just saw this thread......now I've gotta explain why I'm talking to random guys on the internet about her "boobs"

Tell her a bad HANS installation will cause more discomfort than a cheap Chinese-made Wal-Mart bra.

If that doesn't work, then she grew up a spoiled rich girl, and I got nothing to help ya...

friedgreencorrado wrote:

Spinout007 wrote: oh man my wife just saw this thread......now I've gotta explain why I'm talking to random guys on the internet about her "boobs"

Tell her a bad HANS installation will cause more discomfort than a cheap Chinese-made Wal-Mart bra. If *that* doesn't work, then she grew up a spoiled rich girl, and I got nothing to help ya...

More discomfort? I don't think that's what I want to tell her. LOL But I think I got the point. "Spoiled rich girl?" nah that's not her, she's too much of a work-a-holic.

oldsaw wrote: And what do you mean by "mainly"?

Some members were acquired, others were created.