1 2
Travis_K
Travis_K Dork
4/30/10 12:22 a.m.

Well my dad bought an Omni GLHS new and drove it daily for years, although with 175k miles it was totally worn out, and he ended up selling if for a couple hundred dollars 15 years ago and buying a Neon ACR. I had an 85 Shelby Charger, and I drove it for 3 years, but it wasnt very reliable, and replacement parts (other than remanufactured chinese junk and stuff from the junkyard) were way harder to get even than parts for my Alfa. I think mine was particularly bad though, so who knows.

poopshovel
poopshovel SuperDork
4/30/10 8:12 a.m.
rob_lewis wrote:
Why not just buy a Rampage?
Probably because they're as rare as hens teeth to find anymore. And if you do fine one, it's probably so beat down you'd still have to spend a ton of dough getting it in driveable shape. -Rob

Maybe it's a regional thing. They pop up here all the time. I've seen a couple CLEAN ones go cheap. This one, maybe not so clean, but 62,000 miles, runner, and some new panels is probably a really good start for under a grand:

http://atlanta.craigslist.org/sat/cto/1702805643.html

slantvaliant
slantvaliant HalfDork
4/30/10 8:19 a.m.

Needs more Shelby:

poopshovel
poopshovel SuperDork
4/30/10 8:21 a.m.

Ooooooooooh mama.

Vigo
Vigo Reader
4/30/10 9:45 a.m.

Here's a picture of some in my yard

stan
stan GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
4/30/10 9:57 a.m.

Those are probably rust-free too.

You won't find many rust-free ones up here in the north.

integraguy
integraguy HalfDork
4/30/10 11:50 a.m.

Hey Vigo,

the last brand new Rampage I saw was at a small central Texas Chrysler dealership. It sat there for nearly a year, or at least it seemed that long.

turboswede
turboswede GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
4/30/10 2:16 p.m.

Hey Travis, I think we've established before that your car was pretty thrashed when you got it and short of a full restore wasn't going to be reliable.

As for your Dad's GLH-S, considering it was originally a 146hp Turbo 1, converted to 175hp T2 at Shelby's factory, including the lightweight connecting rods, poor deck cooling, lack of oil cooler and closed off hood vent (all of which Shelby wanted fixed but couldn't) I'd say it did just fine and most of the Turbo 2.2 motors tend to last to around 150-200K and need to be rebuilt, just a fact of life as the rings and bearings just can't take that kind of abuse forever.

Vigo
Vigo Reader
4/30/10 4:15 p.m.

The motors are pretty damn strong/reliable as far as handling power. The one thing they usually cant take is being driven with blown headgaskets until they lock up or spin bearings.

Pat
Pat Reader
4/30/10 9:50 p.m.

The problem with 2.2/2.5 motors at this point is that they've been pounded on and neglected for 20 years by the time you get them. I've been driving and racing them for the last 13 years or so, and other than dealing with prior owner neglect, they've been amazingly resilient.

Give them a little attention at the front end, throw some fresh gaskets on there and address prior owner induced damage and you're good to go....for a long time.

Kia_racer
Kia_racer Reader
4/30/10 10:38 p.m.

That is true of most cars. I find that a lot of Americans (This group excluded) don't do the maintance to keep there cars going dang near forever. If you can't just keep oil and change tires to keep it moving then it is a POS. Many performance cars would last much longer if the average people that bought them would just take care of them.

93celicaGT2
93celicaGT2 SuperDork
4/30/10 10:48 p.m.
poopshovel wrote: OR Swap in a turbo 2.4 and run 10's:

This is awesome, and hilarious. The slicks look like they're on the wrong end.

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
s7zA8t8uJY5zfqrcfH2O89xqsMp76NmSkcgU1uhvmB03XVFkeGVVXWuT9HgbudbC