kevlarcorolla wrote:
After my previous projects I have slowed down quite a lot but for sure a lift isn't for storage or routine maintenance.
So here's how I look at it. There are two reasons to own a lift, one is to increase your available covered parking by stacking cars vertically, the other is to provide access for working on the car. Against this, there are two main constraints on the kind of lift you can put in, they are space and money. The different lift options offer different tradeoffs against these items.
4 post lifts are better for parking, because they are more stable and they keep the car on its wheels.
When it comes to service, both a 2-post and a 4-post will rolling bridge jacks are capable of doing mostly the same set of things (there are few exceptions -- 2 post will separate a body from frame/subframe, whereas 4 post will do alignments). The 2 post will always have less stuff in the way though, so it's generally better from this perspective.
The 2 post appears smaller, but when applied to home garages actually takes up more space. This is because the 2 post requires a lot more width, whereas the increase in length of a 4 post is pretty much all in the space you'd be using to park a car anyway.
The 2 post is more expensive to install because it requires a stronger floor to bolt it down to. If you go with 2 rolling bridge jacks then the 4 post is probably more expensive to buy outright.
The in-floor scissor lift is, IMHO, inferior in almost every way. It can't stack cars, it's still got lots of stuff in the way. It can't do alignments or lift bodies off frames, and it requires a ton of floor prep. It might be cheaper, I'm not sure. It is nice in that it basically disappears when you're not using it, so it probably wins on the aesthetics front.
It sounds like you have lots of space, are building the shop from scratch (and can thus spec the floor), and don't Iive somewhere that you're worried about earthquakes so I think the 2-post is the clear winner. That's what I'd do in that situation.