Vigo wrote: It's half the money because the newer car is approximately 100% better (imo) in terms of materials, build quality, appearance, technology, etc etc etc. Seriously, the first gen CTS probably saved cadillac, and the V is a GRM hero car, but the basic car itself, objectively, is almost a pile of crap compared to a new ATS. GM has improved their products at breakneck speed since the first gen CTS came out the new cars are genuinely much better. Dont get me wrong, the first gen CTSV was a very neat car and a great bargain at current prices, but implying it is a similar car to a new ATS at half the price is disingenuous. If you put the first gen CTS on a cadillac dealer's new car lot today and tried to sell it as a new car, they would immediately hide it somewhere where it couldnt embarass them. New Cadillacs are just that much better than 10 year old cadillacs. Im just saying there are really good reasons why v1 CTSV is half the price of a new ATS.
I approve of and agree with this statement.