1 2 3 4
frenchyd
frenchyd UltraDork
2/24/19 7:40 a.m.
SVreX said:

In reply to frenchyd :

There are LOTS of different construction techniques- plywood, fiberglass, laminated panels, aluminum, stainless steel...

NONE of them would ever pass a crash test. The commercial bus chassis units would do the best, but they’d still fail miserably. 

You cant make a big open box strong without making  it unbelievably heavy. 

 

That may be true but not all crashes are extremes.  In fact I wonder how valid crash testing an RV would be?  I see seat belts in a massive variety of positions on a big variety of seats.  Would every occupant of every seat be safe in every accident?  

We know and accept that there are fatal accident in even modern crash tested cars.  Since there are no absolutes, perhaps judgement and common sense  should be the criteria rather than some arbitrary criteria?  

Especially since to my knowledge there is no separate listing  for accidents and fatalities in RV’s. Even if there were, how would they be listed? By class? Which chassis/which manufacturer? On a per driven mile basis? 

Unlike cars, RV’s aren’t in daily use, usually. In fact a large number are used less than once a year.  

I’m sorry but I honestly believe we are in opinion territory rather than factual.  

frenchyd
frenchyd UltraDork
2/24/19 8:33 a.m.
SVreX said:

RVs have been a huge part of my family. I’ve been doing it for over 50 years in all different types. 

I’ll try not to rant about this, but letting kids wander around an RV while riding down the road at 70 mph is NO DIFFERENT then letting them jump up and down in the bed of a pickup truck at highway speeds. It’s stupid. 

With all due respect to everyone who is gonna disagree with me, kids can be taught to be comfortable strapped into appropriate seats.  The way you train them does not include letting them run around the coach sometimes, but strapping them when  in a car.  The way you train them is consistent parenting.  Properly belted at ALL times in ALL vehicles.

I have 5 kids. They’ve all traveled  extensively.  Never had a problem wearing seatbelts. 

Your use of the words   Wander around   is perjuritive.   

 I believe I understand the point you are attempting to make but I’ve traveled with too many people in RV’s where children are allowed to unstrap and switch seats, etc under adult supervision while moving.  

To be fair when I owned my motor homes I did not have my own children, but I suspect I would have followed others in that regard. 

 

 

KyAllroad (Jeremy)
KyAllroad (Jeremy) UltimaDork
2/24/19 8:48 a.m.

P3PPY, I had two RVs so can only give you serious opinions on each.  Notice I said “had” and not “owned”, both were purchased by my FIL to be used and maintained by me to transport him around as his health failed.  The first was a class C.  1999 Ford E-350 with a 5.4 motor and a 24’ box.  It was loud, the wind going around that big box was noisy, the cabinet doors buzzed and rattled, loud.  Got 8 mpg on the highway.   It was purchased in 2008 with under 20K on the clock so I never felt like it was mechanically unreliable but it was pretty badly under powered.

Next up he bought a 19’ Pleasureway class B+.  Much quieter!  More of a glorified conversion van than a real RV however as it only had the tiniest of facilities to qualify.  Plenty of power (by 2006 the Triton was 300 hp instead of the previous models 240) and more aerodynamics meant it could see 12 mpg.  But the SRW E-350 chassis swayed alarmingly, i’ve Never driven something that was so nerve-wracking on the highway.  Seriously bad handling.

But at your price point I’d look at a travel van.  Something designed for the highway with some room but without the bathroom and kitchen.  Stay in cheap hotels with pools for the kids and pee at rest stops.  Maybe camp once or twice along the way but alternate those nights out with nights in hotels.  It’s supposed to be a vacation and cooking, cleaning, and fixing isn’t as relaxing as buying meals and staying at hotels.

A 401 CJ
A 401 CJ GRM+ Memberand Dork
2/24/19 8:49 a.m.

Box truck and make it as close to the Ski Bum thread truck as possible.

Streetwiseguy
Streetwiseguy MegaDork
2/24/19 9:01 a.m.
frenchyd said:
SVreX said:

In reply to frenchyd :

There are LOTS of different construction techniques- plywood, fiberglass, laminated panels, aluminum, stainless steel...

NONE of them would ever pass a crash test. The commercial bus chassis units would do the best, but they’d still fail miserably. 

You cant make a big open box strong without making  it unbelievably heavy. 

 

That may be true but not all crashes are extremes.  In fact I wonder how valid crash testing an RV would be?  I see seat belts in a massive variety of positions on a big variety of seats.  Would every occupant of every seat be safe in every accident?  

 

Unlike cars, RV’s aren’t in daily use, usually. In fact a large number are used less than once a year.  

 

So, they are driven by people who are unfamiliar with how the units handle.  I suppose if you were asleep on a bed in the back of the unit when the driver hit the bridge abutment, you might survive flying up to the front of the vehicle before you stopped suddenly.

Being an accident, you can't really choose whether you will have a major or minor collision.  That's why seat belts while moving at least give you a shot at surviving.  Unless the propane tanks rupture...

 

SVreX
SVreX MegaDork
2/24/19 9:09 a.m.
frenchyd said:
SVreX said:

In reply to frenchyd :

There are LOTS of different construction techniques- plywood, fiberglass, laminated panels, aluminum, stainless steel...

NONE of them would ever pass a crash test. The commercial bus chassis units would do the best, but they’d still fail miserably. 

You cant make a big open box strong without making  it unbelievably heavy. 

 

That may be true but not all crashes are extremes.  In fact I wonder how valid crash testing an RV would be?  I see seat belts in a massive variety of positions on a big variety of seats.  Would every occupant of every seat be safe in every accident?  

We know and accept that there are fatal accident in even modern crash tested cars.  Since there are no absolutes, perhaps judgement and common sense  should be the criteria rather than some arbitrary criteria?  

Especially since to my knowledge there is no separate listing  for accidents and fatalities in RV’s. Even if there were, how would they be listed? By class? Which chassis/which manufacturer? On a per driven mile basis? 

Unlike cars, RV’s aren’t in daily use, usually. In fact a large number are used less than once a year.  

I’m sorry but I honestly believe we are in opinion territory rather than factual.  

Have you ever seen a wrecked Motorhome?

Shredded little bits scattered for miles are common. Check out the back lot of most RV centers. Awful is common. 

This isn’t opinion. It’s basic engineering. Big empty box. No cross braces or reinforcing.  And significant impact from any direction and basic physics takes over. 

Crosswinds are a common cause of wrecks. Almost never a problem in a car. 

This isn’t rocket science. 

A 401 CJ
A 401 CJ GRM+ Memberand Dork
2/24/19 9:23 a.m.
bearmtnmartin said:

I must be in the minority, which seems to be my happy place anyway. We have put around 15,000 miles on our 1981 Wanderlodge, and there is nothing better than cruising down the highway, kids playing a game at the kitchen table, and my wife whipping up tasty snacks in the galley. We have 10 seatbelt but they do not get used as much as they should be, if I am honest. Flame away if you cannot resist. It does need regular maintenance, but I paid $10,000.00 and this is a gearhead community after all.

My recommendation other than buy the best you can afford is look for a one piece roof and have an expert who knows where to look to go over it for water damage which Is what kills many of them.

He said RV and you said Wanderlodge.  If an RV were a cardboard box, a Wanderlodge would be a bank vault.  There is no comparison.

wae
wae SuperDork
2/24/19 9:32 a.m.
frenchyd said:
SVreX said:

RVs have been a huge part of my family. I’ve been doing it for over 50 years in all different types. 

I’ll try not to rant about this, but letting kids wander around an RV while riding down the road at 70 mph is NO DIFFERENT then letting them jump up and down in the bed of a pickup truck at highway speeds. It’s stupid. 

With all due respect to everyone who is gonna disagree with me, kids can be taught to be comfortable strapped into appropriate seats.  The way you train them does not include letting them run around the coach sometimes, but strapping them when  in a car.  The way you train them is consistent parenting.  Properly belted at ALL times in ALL vehicles.

I have 5 kids. They’ve all traveled  extensively.  Never had a problem wearing seatbelts. 

Your use of the words   Wander around   is perjuritive.   

 I believe I understand the point you are attempting to make but I’ve traveled with too many people in RV’s where children are allowed to unstrap and switch seats, etc under adult supervision while moving.  

To be fair when I owned my motor homes I did not have my own children, but I suspect I would have followed others in that regard. 

 

 

I feel like I'm being sucked in, but I just can't resist...  When I have my kids in the car, it doesn't go into gear until all seatbelts are properly fastened and those belts don't come off until the ride has come to a full and complete stop.  No exceptions.  That said, though, when we're in the motorhome, on the Interstate, in clear weather, outside of metro areas, with no weird road conditions or traffic, I have no problem letting them unbelt, walk back to the head, and return to their seat.  Is there a risk?  Certainly.  Is that risk as big as throwing the fam in the back of a pickemup and heading down the highway? I think that comparison is laughable.  I wouldn't let folks just wander around the back at all times in any condition, but we're weighing the risk of a trip to the bathroom or the fridge when we're on a divided highway in the middle of nowhere in good weather versus the overall enjoyment of the trip.  Do your own math and decide for yourself if you think the level of risk outweighs the benefit.  Personally, we've decided that the impact is high but the probability is incredibly low.

One other thing, though, is in regards to the capability of the P platform versus maybe something built on a E450 chassis or something.  One thing that I've discovered in my cheap motorhome ownership experience is that as cheap as I am, the motorhome builders are even cheaper.  Yeah, the P30 chassis is built as a medium-duty truck forward control chassis by GM (and then Workhorse), but plenty of the components are sourced from the 1-ton light-duty truck parts bin.  Much of the front suspension, the transmission, and the engine interchanges with the C/K3500 of the same era and several of the parts are in the catalog as being for model years 1975-1998.  That's kind of a good thing in terms of being able to find parts (although figuring out WHICH version of the P30 you have can be a challenge), but don't think that because they also made bread vans out of the running gear that you're getting something that is all that different from a large pickup.  The other part to that is if you take your motorhome to the scales and check it against the GVWR printed on the placard you might find that with a full load of fuel, water, food, propane, luggage, and people, you are overweight.  Conventional wisdom is that some coaches were actually overweight from the factory, although I've never personally seen a scale slip that backs that up.  My experience is with P30s, but I think the F53 platform from Ford is basically in a similar position -- although it may get a slightly higher GVWR.  Another problem is that when they drop the house on top of the engine, they don't do much in terms of airflow so the engine and trans tend to run a little bit hotter.

That said, don't think that I'm discouraging the idea.  I think you are a little low on your budget number, but if you can kick a few more dollars in and do some very careful shopping, you might be able to get pretty close.  I shopped for about 4 or 5 months and put about 3000 miles on my car driving around looking at coaches before I found the one I bought.  With mine, I bought it, brought it home, caught it on fire, and drove it 2,000 miles to Oklahoma and back two weeks later.  I think I paid $7,500 for it from a private seller and it's a 32' 1993 Itasca on a P30 chassis with a 454.  When you're shopping, look at tires and windshields.  Tires are going to be at least $175 each, often much more, and I wouldn't go down the road with any tire with a DOT code older than 7 years.  They will age-out before they wear out.  Windshields are typically two piece and each side is around $950.  Because the construction is somewhat...  weak, they are prone to cracking windshields when just going down the road or when deploying leveling jacks and putting a little bit of twist into the coach.  I found a ton of coaches that needed 6 $200 tires and a $950 windshield just to be able to go on my first trip, but they weren't priced accordingly. 

Water intrusion is another big thing.  The coment about the one piece roof is a good one.  Winnebago (and Itasca, since those are badge-engineered Winnebagos) typically use a one-piece fiberglass roof that will last "forever" versus the EDPM rubber sheeting that gets UV-ed to death and has to be replaced every few years.  It's also much harder to put a tear into a fiberglass roof.  That said, even a one-piece will need some maintenance, but Eternabond tape will be your friend there.  That holds for motorhomes and towables, btw.  Watch for delamination on the sides, as well.  It can be fixed, and in your price range you'll probably have to accept that you'll have some level of that in a motorhome, but keep it to a minimum.  I've got a little bit of a bubble on mine where the stove vent shroud leaked way back when before I owned it.  As long as you repair the original damage so it doesn't get any worse and it's a fairly small spot it can be something you live with.

They're much harder to work on since you're not going to be able to pull it into your garage and your aluminum racing jack isn't going to do much for you.  You can use the leveling jacks to get it raised up, but don't even think about getting under there without a set of heavy duty jack stands.  I got the 12-ton ones from the Hammer Store along with a 20T bottle jack.  Parts can be a challenge to find depending on what you're trying to fix.  I need a steering arm for mine that doesn't seem to exist any more even though it's a part number that was on vehicles made from 1975-1998!  Most of the appliances, however, are from a couple manufacturers that love the parts bin.  I've needed to do some fridge and water heater repairs while on the road before and any RV dealer/supplier will usually have parts like burner manifolds, thermostats, and the like in-stock for not a ton of cash.  

When I started looking, I originally wanted a towable since I didn't want another engine to maintain and another vehicle to insure.  I wound up with the motorhome for two reasons:  The first is that I want to be able to use the RV for multi-day rallycross events and I can't tow a racecar behind a towable behind a truck.  The second is kind of silly, but most towables that I've seen don't have facilities for an on-board generator.  I can start the generator in my motorhome without getting out of bed and by the time I make it to the galley, the generator is warmed up and I can turn on the coffee pot.  With a towable, you're probably getting dressed to go outside to start the generator so you can go back in to make coffee.  I know that's a crazy edge case, but to each their own, I suppose!

yupididit
yupididit UltraDork
2/24/19 10:14 a.m.

Lol @ you all saying wife making you "sandwiches" while you drive. Let her drive while you make sandwiches. 

yupididit
yupididit UltraDork
2/24/19 10:14 a.m.

In reply to Vigo :

Can you drag my starion back. Thanks lol

wae
wae SuperDork
2/24/19 10:49 a.m.
yupididit said:

Lol @ you all saying wife making you "sandwiches" while you drive. Let her drive while you make sandwiches. 

I've tried. She flat out refuses to even sit in the driver's seat.  So she alternates between sammich duty and nap duty and quite happy about it.

porschenut
porschenut Reader
2/24/19 10:52 a.m.

Lots of good info here.  7 grand for an RV is an excuse to spend way more the first year, fixing breakdowns on the road is expensive and you don't know if the family is even going to enjoy the experience.  Go to RV shows, cruise forums and rent this summer.  Figure out how often your calendar allows trips and what it ends up costing per weekend.  

The trailer vs driver discussion is major.  We have had 3 drivers but now have a trailer.  A nice aluminum frame fiberglass sided one that can be towed by a half ton pickup that can be serviced by any garage if it breaks.  And on the wandering kids while driving thing, not a good idea.  If they do something stupid it is a major distraction and the interior of an RV has too many things that could hurt them in a panic stop.  

But be optimistic and keep looking and learning.  My kids hated it the first few nights but after a two week trip they never wanted to go back home.  Great experience for a family.

eastsideTim
eastsideTim UltraDork
2/24/19 11:59 a.m.

In reply to KyAllroad (Jeremy) :

When looking at Class B motor homes a ways back, I read in multiple places that Pleasureway has had issues in the past with their floorplan and holding tank locations creating bad center of gravity issues that led to bad handling.  Don’t know when (or if) they’ve sorted it.

For 7000, I think I’d be more inclined to look for a conversion van on a 3/4 or 1 ton chassis, although that makes camping for more than 2 rather difficult.  It’s unfortunate that Westfalia VW Campers are so pricey nowadays.  Our family of 4 + a dog camped in those a lot when I was a kid.  

pirate
pirate Reader
2/24/19 12:48 p.m.

We have owned pop up campers, pickup campers and several motorhomes. We have traveled across the country when our kids were young and now take our grand kids regularly sometimes with their parents. We use the motorhome for travel, going to the beach, college football games, pulling a car trailer to car shows, local and national race car events, visiting friends and relatives, etc. etc. We have stayed in state parks, national parks, private campgrounds, RV resorts, the infields and trackside of race tracks plus the occasional boondocks away from everyone.

With that said owning an RV is not for everyone. With proper/required maintenance, insurance, license fees, fuel, storage fees, camping site fees, etc. it is not cheap. As someone else has said you could take some very nice vacations for the same amount or less money.  It’s a life style thing similar to owning a large boat. You either like it or you don’t.  For us it puts us in the center of activities we enjoy. It is often a bit more spontaneous rather then a lot of planning, reservations, etc. 

The size of the RV has little to do with quality. There are very high quality manufacturers who produce small and efficient models as well as manufacturers who produce the largest Class A motorhomes that are junk. My advice is pick a manufacturer known for quality like Newmar, Tiffin, Winnebago and several others. Even if you need to buy an older model stick with the quality. Avoid entry level models which have a lot of flash but are not made to last with even light use. Inspect very carefully before buying and walk away from those that show leaks or lack of maintenance.

Inspect tires carefully. Thread wear is rarely a problem however look carefully at center and edges for damage from over or under inflation or alignment issues. It is usually UV damage or weather checking after 5 years that kills tires which can be very expensive. Six tire, mounting, balancing and alignment check can easily consume $2000 to $2500.

As someone once said on this forum somewhere “There is nothing more expensive as a free or cheap BMW” the same thing applies to a cheap or free RV.

frenchyd
frenchyd UltraDork
2/24/19 2:08 p.m.
Streetwiseguy said:
frenchyd said:
SVreX said:

In reply to frenchyd :

There are LOTS of different construction techniques- plywood, fiberglass, laminated panels, aluminum, stainless steel...

NONE of them would ever pass a crash test. The commercial bus chassis units would do the best, but they’d still fail miserably. 

You cant make a big open box strong without making  it unbelievably heavy. 

 

That may be true but not all crashes are extremes.  In fact I wonder how valid crash testing an RV would be?  I see seat belts in a massive variety of positions on a big variety of seats.  Would every occupant of every seat be safe in every accident?  

 

Unlike cars, RV’s aren’t in daily use, usually. In fact a large number are used less than once a year.  

 

So, they are driven by people who are unfamiliar with how the units handle.  I suppose if you were asleep on a bed in the back of the unit when the driver hit the bridge abutment, you might survive flying up to the front of the vehicle before you stopped suddenly.

Being an accident, you can't really choose whether you will have a major or minor collision.  That's why seat belts while moving at least give you a shot at surviving.  Unless the propane tanks rupture...

 

SVreX said  something about seeing shattered bits and pieces left after an accident. Doesn’t sound like having the seatbelts fastened would have mattered in that case. On the other hand when I sold GMC motorhomes  new owners would bring them back occasionally after accidents and they’d replace a few panels and parts and send them back out.  

Some accidents are minor and some are serious.  I know GMC used high quality seats but I’m not sure even in that well engineered motorhome every accident would have been survivable even being completely compulsive about seatbelts fastened.  

Granted I only sold them for a little over 2 years but of all the motorhomes we sold in that period none were ever involved in fatal accidents.  Can’t say that about cars and trucks sold during that same period.  

Demonstrating a brand new $33,000 GMC Eleganza 26 ft motorhome I would take them out, get them on the highway and at the first roadside rest stop put one of them in the drivers seat. Those were my instructions.  If they refused I went straight back to the dealership because I knew there was no chance of selling it.  

Besides in those days my commission on a typical motor home deal was tiny compared to the commission I earned selling new Honda Civic’s.  Actually I never really sold a Honda, I just took orders. ( and told them what color they would get and when they would get it).

Jay_W
Jay_W Dork
2/24/19 2:18 p.m.

At 25 years of owning RV's I could be really windbaggy on this but what it boils down to is that if your budget is 7k, buy the best van conversion class B you can get your mitts on. Anything else, anything at all, will double your budget almost instantly. Any possible roof leaks in a 7k B will be easy to track down and fix. There is your primary motivation right there.

bearmtnmartin
bearmtnmartin GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
2/24/19 2:22 p.m.

An RV is an adventure. Driving them in a crosswind is an adventure, backing them up with a trailer you cannot see iin your mirrors is an adventure, blowing an overloaded tire or overheating on a steep hill is an adventure, and setting up camp to discover your house batteries are dead and you have a propane leak is another adventure.  If you are not comfortable with adventures then perhaps a hotel and a plane ticket is a better idea. I think it is interesting that in a forum devoted to spending silly amounts of time building and racing cars, there is so much discussion here about the safety and reliability aspects of old RV's. 

frenchyd
frenchyd UltraDork
2/24/19 2:24 p.m.

In reply to pirate :

Good points but I don’t buy an age limit to tires.  I do absolutely accept that some tires  can be ruined even with plenty of tread in 5-7 years.  But not all!  

Stored inside out of the sun, maybe up on blocks so they have no load?  I’ll look at the tire itself before I judge it’s time for replacement. A well respected brand  of good  load capacity with low miles stored properly and no sign of damage?  A careful inspection will tell me better than some arbitrary rule will if those tires are road worthy. 

SVreX
SVreX MegaDork
2/24/19 2:32 p.m.

In reply to frenchyd :

Hang on, Frenchy. Don’t twist my words. 

Seatbelts are one issue. Crashworthiness is another. 

- Streetwiseguy made a comment that plywood construction wouldn’t survive a crash test. 

- YOU said there were other types of construction (which sounded like you were suggesting some would be acceptable in a crash)

- THEN I said there were multiple kinds of construction, and none would fare well in a crash. 

No, I don’t think there are very many safe ways to be in a motorhome wreck at all- seatbelts or not. My seatbelt suggestion is a boost for travel trailers (because the tow vehicle is much more crash worthy), not motorhomes. 

SVreX
SVreX MegaDork
2/24/19 2:38 p.m.

In reply to frenchyd :

I have specifically been using the word “wreck”. 

If you would like to discuss an incident that a few panels were replaced, I’m gonna say that was not a wreck. It was a minor incident- perhaps a scrape. Those are routine in motorhomes (because the darned things are so big, and the drivers can’t handle them)

Highway speed wrecks in motorhomes are bad. 

I witnessed an incident last week. A pickup truck and a Kia Soul made contact heading the same direction on the interstate. Both vehicles ended up spinning more than 360* at 70+ mph. Both came to a rest with no injuries. 

There is no chance an RV would not have rolled over in the identical incident. 

frenchyd
frenchyd UltraDork
2/24/19 2:39 p.m.
bearmtnmartin said:

An RV is an adventure. Driving them in a crosswind is an adventure, backing them up with a trailer you cannot see iin your mirrors is an adventure, blowing an overloaded tire or overheating on a steep hill is an adventure, and setting up camp to discover your house batteries are dead and you have a propane leak is another adventure.  If you are not comfortable with adventures then perhaps a hotel and a plane ticket is a better idea. I think it is interesting that in a forum devoted to spending silly amounts of time building and racing cars, there is so much discussion here about the safety and reliability aspects of old RV's. 

Well said, a lot of the myths taken as gospel are started by old retired people terrified of something so big when nothing in their previous life have prepared them for the adventure of RV life.  

Yes I’ve had some such adventures. Adventure is part of a life well lived. It may not be for everyone, but some enjoy that part of life.  Not everyone wants to spend their life sitting in front of a TV waiting to die in their sleep.  

Gotta be careful. Someone will take that statement and claim that I’m  heck bent on dying. Nothing could be further from the truth.  I’m informed, experienced, and want to have as long a life as I’m allowed.  I just won’t be afraid of my shadow.  Less experienced people cannot scare me into being timid or  afraid.  

SVreX
SVreX MegaDork
2/24/19 2:42 p.m.

Seatbelts in motorhomes...

When people ARE traveling in a motorhome, I think everyone should wear belts and not move around the cabin. 

A pothole or small gust could easily knock anyone off their feet and end with someone whacking their head on the cabinetry. 

The OP was comparing travel trailers to motorhomes, and specifically mentioned his kids moving around the cabin while in motion. 

Its dangerous. 

frenchyd
frenchyd UltraDork
2/24/19 2:49 p.m.

In reply to SVreX :

That may be, and while I know fatal accidents have occurred in RV’s I’ve seen a plenty of fatal car, truck, Semi truck/ trailer, Bus accidents over my life. Not yet seen a fatal RV. 

Like I said I know they must have occurred I just haven’t seen one yet.  Thus I’m going to go out on a limb and say they aren’t as common. 

Having said that airline travel is reportedly the safest way to travel. Still airplanes do on occasion crash and when they do it’s not usually good for the people in the airplane.  

yupididit
yupididit UltraDork
2/24/19 4:16 p.m.

In reply to SVreX and Frenchyd :

 

 

I always get a chuckle when y'all share a thread. 

SVreX
SVreX MegaDork
2/24/19 4:18 p.m.

In reply to P3PPY :

We’ve debated a lot, and chased several rabbits, but here is the bottom line on seatbelts:

Michigan (where you live) requires children in the coach to be seatbelted.  

So, if you decide to buy a motorhome, you will need to put your kids in seatbelts. 

1 2 3 4

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
ZdNOPcWNIxy0y1PW6ux658WBn9Ws2ccKaGBKuK4SzC0tRTAuHZAHAJiylygKTERT