Just throwing this out there. CVT Legacy Vs. an AWD Kizashi, to replace my mom' '07 Taurus.
And GO!
I bought the Legacy simply because my mother in law wouldn't drive across town to see the Suzuki. Also she'd heard of Subaru but not about Suzuki. That's probably the big issue.
I drove the Kizashi and set it side by side with my is250 and feature by feature the Suzuki pretty well compared. It surprised the heck out of me.
Javelin wrote: Kizashi hands down. Best new car for the money, bar none.
We just had one in the press car rotation, so look for a review soon. (Next Monday, I think?)
Short version? It was nice, but not ^^that^^ nice.
I would recommend the 2011 Mediocrity.
It's Extra-Ordinary!
http://www.subaru.com/content/static/fightmediocrity/vid2.html
I like how you brought up the original 2 cars and your mom ended up with something WAY FASTER that what us car forum peeps were discussing.. We shoulda been aiming higher
Vigo wrote: I like how you brought up the original 2 cars and your mom ended up with something WAY FASTER that what us car forum peeps were discussing.. We shoulda been aiming higher![]()
We kinda "fell into" the accord. Right mix of price, color, condition, ect. And talk about Lightyears ahead of Taurus it replaced
Has me looking for a manual 7th gen again.
jrw1621 wrote: I would recommend the 2011 Mediocrity. It's Extra-Ordinary! http://www.subaru.com/content/static/fightmediocrity/vid2.html
I laughed at a recent commercial where the company was touting how their car had a "Fuel Injected, over-head cam, inline engine." I really want to do a parody where we tout how a vehicle has an "internal combustion, 4-cycle, reciprocating motor."
You'll need to log in to post.