No, no–I'm not talking about new car models. I'm talking about people, as we spent all morning shooting new pictures for our online store. Here's a teaser for now:
But keep an eye on our web store for new pictures of almost every item.
Curious what our current models look like? Need a new GRM shirt or a bucket hat? Head on over to our web store now.
Whatever happened to that racy GRM lingerie idea? 
Remember the cute girls at the pick-and-pull article where they wore GRM clothing? You could do that again for action shots.
JoeyM wrote: Remember the cute girls at the pick-and-pull article where they wore GRM clothing? You could do that again for action shots.
+1!
Jerry wrote:JoeyM wrote: Remember the cute girls at the pick-and-pull article where they wore GRM clothing? You could do that again for action shots.+1!
That would be great if we hadn't gotten a TON of complaints about us running those pictures in GRM. Even though they weren't really racy at all, we had some very vocal objections to having pretty ladies not wearing all that much in GRM. Seriously, you would've thought we had shown full frontal nudity----- it was crazy!
Joe Gearin wrote: That would be great if we hadn't gotten a TON of complaints about us running those pictures in GRM. Even though they weren't really racy at all, we had some very vocal objections to having pretty ladies not wearing all that much in GRM. Seriously, you would've thought we had shown full frontal nudity----- it was crazy!
Do you subscribe to the theory that there is no such thing as bad publicity?
Tom Suddard wrote: No, no–I'm not talking about new car models. I'm talking about people, as we spent all morning shooting new pictures for our online store. Here's a teaser for now:
Sorry, that looks kinda creepy to me, needs a pedo bear in the corner.
Joe Gearin wrote: Seriously, you would've thought we had shown full frontal nudity----- it was crazy!
You can't make that statement without doing an actual study. If you were to run some full-frontal next month, for instance, you would have a comparison to draw from
Joe Gearin wrote:Jerry wrote:That would be great if we hadn't gotten a TON of complaints about us running those pictures in GRM. Even though they weren't really racy at all, we had some very vocal objections to having pretty ladies not wearing all that much in GRM. Seriously, you would've thought we had shown full frontal nudity----- it was crazy!JoeyM wrote: Remember the cute girls at the pick-and-pull article where they wore GRM clothing? You could do that again for action shots.+1!
Then they must not look at the GGA thread.......
DrBoost wrote:Joe Gearin wrote: Seriously, you would've thought we had shown full frontal nudity----- it was crazy!You can't make that statement without doing an actual study. If you were to run some full-frontal next month, for instance, you would have a comparison to draw from
All they would have to do is attend a HIN event while taking pictures......plenty of that floating around.
On that note, is that your sister Tom? 
Joe Gearin wrote: That would be great if we hadn't gotten a TON of complaints about us running those pictures in GRM. Even though they weren't really racy at all, we had some very vocal objections to having pretty ladies not wearing all that much in GRM. Seriously, you would've thought we had shown full frontal nudity----- it was crazy!
They were wearing SHORTS!?!!! ZOMG!!11!!!!
Tom Suddard wrote: No, no–I'm not talking about new car models. I'm talking about people, as we spent all morning shooting new pictures for our online store. Here's a teaser for now:
"Hey there little girl, you like my Miata?"
j/k.....though comeon....at least iron all the wrinkles out of the jackets or toss them in the dryer and make it look like they didn't come right out of the packing bag!
Also +1 on the second pic. If people complained about that, perhaps they should be reading Classic Motorsports instead 
Jerry wrote:Joe Gearin wrote: That would be great if we hadn't gotten a TON of complaints about us running those pictures in GRM. Even though they weren't really racy at all, we had some very vocal objections to having pretty ladies not wearing all that much in GRM. Seriously, you would've thought we had shown full frontal nudity----- it was crazy!They were wearing SHORTS!?!!! ZOMG!!11!!!!
I see far racier than that (please note: I said RACier, not RICier... though that also sadly applies) on any given day at the mall, I can't see how people complained that much. Compared to what many car magazines will put on the FRONT COVER, she may as well be wearing a burka...
Now, if we're talking complaints that wearing an outfit like that was inappropriate for parts yard diving? OK, that I can understand.
Curious what our current models look like?
Well since you asked....
He is a fantastic bartender...and probably represents the typical GRM demographic.
She is berkeleying h4wt, and if the typical GRM demographic disagrees, you're all gay, and I don't want to know what other magazines you subscribe to.
Well done.
EDIT: Assuming she's not 14. If so EWWWWW GROOOOOSSSS.
DrBoost wrote:Joe Gearin wrote: Seriously, you would've thought we had shown full frontal nudity----- it was crazy!You can't make that statement without doing an actual study. If you were to run some full-frontal next month, for instance, you would have a comparison to draw from
Careful what you wish for. I like JG and all, but I'm not sure I want to see him naked. Ok, maybe just a little.
FALSE ADVERTISING! I clicked the link and all I got was pics of George Carlin!
JohnRW1621 wrote: Cleveland kidnapper arrested driving blue Miata
J-nik really will do anything for a few clicks, won't they?
So, full frontal nudity is when you can see all the way to the timing chain?
How about some tailpipe articles?
poopshovel wrote:Curious what our current models look like?Well since you asked.... He is a fantastic bartender...and probably represents the typical GRM demographic. She is berkeleying h4wt, and if the typical GRM demographic disagrees, you're all gay, and I don't want to know what other magazines you subscribe to. Well done. EDIT: Assuming she's not 14. If so EWWWWW GROOOOOSSSS.
Hence why I didn't say anything, lol. Teens these days seem to look a lot older than they did when I was that age (and that was in the 90s!). So I'm never really sure when I look at a girl if I look like some kind of perv or not, lol.
irish44j wrote:poopshovel wrote:Hence why I didn't say anything, lol. Teens these days seem to look a lot older than they did when I was that age (and that was in the 90s!). So I'm never really sure when I look at a girl if I look like some kind of perv or not, lol.Curious what our current models look like?Well since you asked.... He is a fantastic bartender...and probably represents the typical GRM demographic. She is berkeleying h4wt, and if the typical GRM demographic disagrees, you're all gay, and I don't want to know what other magazines you subscribe to. Well done. EDIT: Assuming she's not 14. If so EWWWWW GROOOOOSSSS.
Maybe she's born with it, but maybe it's Maybelline!
These are the typical GRM models.
"Got a beer little boy"
Holy crap, bacon on donuts...........were those supposed to have been delivered to a police station?
yamaha wrote: Holy crap, bacon on donuts...........were those supposed to have been delivered to a police station?
At the Mitty, while drunk at 10am while hanging around Mongo.
Life is full of wonderment
You'll need to log in to post.
