gamby
SuperDork
3/12/09 12:09 p.m.
ManofFewWords wrote:
neon4891 wrote:
Reminds me of Clarkson saying something about "going thrue the pearly gates backwards, on fire, at 200mph"
Ultimatly Darwinisim wins again
I'm not convinced this is Darwinism at work. I think many of us here have "gotten away" with some pretty reckless driving in our past, he didn't.
Sorry--I've never been that reckless. Certainly never w/ a passenger int he car. shrug
gamby wrote:
ManofFewWords wrote:
neon4891 wrote:
Reminds me of Clarkson saying something about "going thrue the pearly gates backwards, on fire, at 200mph"
Ultimatly Darwinisim wins again
I'm not convinced this is Darwinism at work. I think many of us here have "gotten away" with some pretty reckless driving in our past, he didn't.
Sorry--I've never been *that* reckless. Certainly never w/ a passenger int he car. **shrug**
... in the middle of the night, drunk? Never.
Has it been confirmed that the driver was drunk? If it has I'll retract that statement.
ManofFewWords wrote:
Has it been confirmed that the driver was drunk? If it has I'll retract that statement.
I wasn't referring to the driver at hand... The sarcasm font is not working again.
John Brown wrote:
ManofFewWords wrote:
Has it been confirmed that the driver was drunk? If it has I'll retract that statement.
I wasn't referring to the driver at hand... The sarcasm font is not working again.
Oh..I was starting to think that all the crap I've done...oh nevermind..I guess I'm just sayin I feel sorry for the guy, as I've pulled alot of E36 M3 in my day...
AngryCorvair wrote: the guy who looks just like me never drove like that again. (exiting parking lots at 5 mph, i mean)
Thank you Pat, thank you.
ManofFewWords wrote:
I'm not convinced this is Darwinism at work. I think many of us here have "gotten away" with some pretty reckless driving in our past, he didn't.
Ya but I had a 79 zephyr with a 200 strait 6. 0-75 timed by a calender.
All this proves to me is that just because you have the $$$ to purchase one of these cars does not mean you are qualified to drive one.
thats funny there was a man who looked like me that drove from indianapolis to chicaco in 1:45 min one sun morning in a 79 malibu with m50 14 tires .
stan
yamaha
New Reader
6/14/11 1:03 a.m.
stan_d wrote:
thats funny there was a man who looked like me that drove from indianapolis to chicaco in 1:45 min one sun morning in a 79 malibu with m50 14 tires .
stan
I've done chicago to lafayette in around an hour before......with a 5 minute stop at a rest area to watch the red and blues go past our convoy of lowly taurus's.....lol found out the toll road's camera's won't snap you if you're going double the limit through them.
I disagree with the counter darwinism post from before, sure, it is true that if he didn't have kids, then its not so much darwinism, but it still removes him permanently from the gene pool......and the people who have just "gotten away with it" evidently were better than he was.....lol
What kind of light poles do they have in California? It fell and cut a car in half? Sign that pole up for the MMA!
gamby
SuperDork
6/14/11 10:25 a.m.
How in the hell did this random thread come back after 2+ years?!
Raze
Dork
6/14/11 10:28 a.m.
gamby wrote:
How in the hell did this random thread come back after 2+ years?!
The thread go dredged up by a canoe, everyone can stop posting now since it's an old thread...
And even after two years those stupid tapout shirts are still around.
dean1484 wrote:
All this proves to me is that just because you have the $$$ to purchase one of these cars does not mean you are qualified to drive one.
Quoted for truth.
I wasn't able to afford a car that could go that fast. The ones I could afford got real scary way, way before any ridiculus speed. Although now that I'm older and know better, still don't have cars that can go that fast but the one I drive now is probably the fastest car I have ever owned. RX8 by the way. And the guy that looks like a younger version of me was alway concerned with getting caught doing the liquored up driving to actually reach ridiculus speeds to actually do it.
I meant to post this before but is this kind of thing really a "car accident"? There should be another term for this kind of thing. I mean it was not an accident once you look at all the factors that lead up to the crash.
qinqin, are you berkeleyin' stupid, who taught you how to paddle
retard canoe multiposting in same thread
Canoes in tandum?! NOOOOOOOOOOO!