1 2 3
roninsoldier83
roninsoldier83 GRM+ Memberand New Reader
12/27/15 1:22 p.m.

So, I've been saving up for my next sporty/weekend/occasional track/autoX car for a while now. Pretty much ever since I sold my last weekend toy- my former 2004 Mazdaspeed Miata. I've driven a very long list of sports cars (mostly roadsters), most of them I had the pleasure of experiencing on my favorite local canyon road! After quite a few test drives, I had my mind pretty much set on getting an AP2 Honda S2000.

The last AP2 I drove through the canyon was just a riot to drive! It felt more confidence inspiring than the AP1 and I preferred the seemingly heavier steering feel over the last couple of AP1's I drove (I'm sure some people won't like that comment!). The only caveat is that prices for the AP2 S2000 seem to be going up and low mileage examples are starting to go for similar amounts of money as a new 2016+ ND Miata.

After doing quite a bit of exhaustive research, I've had my eye set on the later model 2006+ S2000. Mostly because in 2006 Honda implemented quite a few changes that included a new ECU that is easily programmable via Hondata software; which is something that might be appealing down the line. I decided to just spend the extra cash and get a nice, clean, 1 or 2 owner, low mileage (sub-50k miles) car. The only problem is prices on them keep going up and the nice, non-molested 2006+ cars are really commanding a premium. Here lately I regularly see the clean, un-modified 2006+ S2000's with low miles going for $20k-$25k.

Enter the ND Miata.

The new Miata (MX-5) starts at around $25k. However, for my purposes, I wouldn't want the base/Sport model, as the next model up- the Club- comes with a LSD, Bilstein shocks, bigger & wider 17x7” wheels and a shock tower brace. The Club also has a few other extra amenities over the Sport, but honestly those aren't big selling points for me- just the handling components. Granted, the Bilstein's would likely get swapped out for a set of coilovers down the line (maybe not?), but the other suspension components (mostly the LSD) would surely be welcomed. There's also the optional Brembo & BBS wheel package, but I don't think I could justify an additional $3400 for them. The Club starts around $29.5k. For arguments sake, by the time I'm looking to buy here in a few months, lets say I can talk a dealer down into the $27.5k range (cash).

At this point, we're talking $20-$25k for a 2006-2008 Honda S2000 or likely around $27.5k for a brand new 2016 Miata.

In terms of cash, I sold my old Mazdaspeed Miata a while back. I threw the money I made selling my MSM into my “next playtoy car fund” and I've been saving pretty aggressively for quite a while now and plan on purchasing the car cash, without touching my emergency funds, ect. To make sure I have plenty of liquid overhead, I'm also planning on selling my house in just a few months. If the market stays as is, I have about ~$300k in equity in my house, so worst case scenario, if I'm a grand or two short (on what I've saved towards the car), its not a big deal as I should be able to easily cover the difference.

As far as my plans for the next car, it will primarily be a weekend playtoy that I occasionally drive to work when the weather is nice. I plan on using it as a mountain/canyon road carver and occasional HPDE track day and autoX car. It will likely be modified to some extent, but will never be a full blown track machine; as I want to have it remain a street car that the little lady will still enjoy riding it!

Numbers don't describe emotions and no spec sheet can tell me how a car makes me feel. With that said, we are talking about performance cars and its probably valid to actually include performance metrics into the conversation. As such, here's the most relevant specs between the two of them (as per Car and Driver):

AP2 S2000 (2004 tested)-

-0-60mph= 5.5

-0-100mph= 14.0

-0-120mph= 22.3

-1/4 mile= 14.0@100mph

-Top speed= 150mph

-Rolling 5-60mph= 6.9

-Top gear 30-50mph= 9.7

-Top gear 50-70mph= 8.5

-Horsepower= 240hp @ 7800rpm (later rated at 237hp)

-Torque= 162 ft-lbs @ 6500rpm

-Curb weight= 2866 lbs

-Weight distribution= 49/51% F/R (slightly rearward weight bias)

-Skidpad= 0.88g

-Braking 70-0mph= 163 ft

ND 2016+ Miata-

-0-60mph= 5.9

-0-100mph= 16.2

-0-120mph= 28.9

-1/4 mile= 14.6@95mph

-Top speed= 129mph

-Rolling 5-60mph= 6.6

-Top gear 30-50mph= 8.4

-Top gear 50-70mph= 8.5

-Horsepower= 155hp @ 6000rpm

-Torque= 148 ft-lbs @ 4800rpm

-Curb weight= 2309 lbs

-Weight distribution= 52.4/47.6% F/R (slightly front weight bias)

-Skidpad= 0.90g

-Braking 70-0mph= 158 ft

Key points:

-The S2000 has considerably more top-end power.

-The S2000 has considerably more overall power (237hp vs 155hp)

-The S2000 has a better power to weight ratio that makes it the faster car overall.

-The Miata has a slightly quicker real world 5-60mph time, likely due to gearing and a more mid-range friendly motor.

-S2000 has slightly rear weight bias vs Miata's slight front weight bias.

-The Miata is a whopping 500+ lbs lighter.

-While the Miata has an advantage on the skidpad, I would laregly ignore skidpad & braking numbers based on how far tire technology has improved in the past 10+ years. They should be relatively equal in the handling department, with the edge likely going to the Miata just due to the huge weight advantage.

-Braking numbers are comparable with the edge to the ND, but again, tire technology has improved over the last 10+ years. I would expect the ND (especially with Brembos) to resist fade to a higher degree by virtue of lightness.

For the record, I'm not exactly a small guy. I'm around 6'2”, 210 lbs or so. As such, interior space is something to consider. I've owned a 1990 NA & 2004 MSM in the past and I fit in both of them, but it was tight. I was more comfortable in the last S2000 I drove (vs the NA/NB), but I haven't driven the new ND Miata yet. Due to my size, looking at interior specs is probably a good idea. Here's the interior specs:

S2000-

Front leg-room- 44.3”

Front head-room- 34.6”

Front hip-room- 49.8”

Front shoulder room- 50.7”

ND Miata-

Front leg-room- 43.1”

Front head-room- 37.4”

Front hip-room- 52.0”

Front shoulder room- 52.2”

I take those measurements with a grain of salt as they're not necessarily indicative of how a particular body type will fit in a car. For instance, most of my height is in my legs and I don't know how Honda measured the S2000's head-room, but it always seemed underrated to me. The S2000 supposedly has less headroom than my old 2004 Mazdaspeed Miata (34.6” vs 37.1”), but I didn't find that to be accurate at all. I drove both (MSM & S2000) back to back and with the top up I had more head-room in the S2000. With that said, it looks like the smaller Miata has a slightly larger interior in almost every way except for leg-room. I'll have to take one on an extended test drive to see how I really fit into it.

With all of that info in mind, here's the breakdown on how I'm seeing these cars right now:

S2000 Pros:

-More powerful engine.

-Tried and true platform. People know what works & what doesn't.

-They are appreciating in price, which is nice long term (also a con if you're planning on buying one!).

-More leg-room, which might come into play with my frame.

-High fun factor.

-Best shifting transmission I've ever shifted.

-Reliable.

-Good looking car in my opinion.

-Rear weight bias= car likes to rotate.

-I've always liked the driver-centric cockpit.

-Might be a collector's car one of these decades down the road; just speculating.

-Purchase price will likely be cheaper.

-VTAAACKK!! Pro and a con. But these engines are fun to wrap out to redline!

S2000 Cons:

-Its a used car, so previous care and maintenance can be hard to predict.

-Engine is pretty much tapped out in NA form without spending serious cash. With intake, header, exhaust & tune you might eek out an extra ~15hp or so, but that's just about it.

-Parts can be a bit pricey.

-500 lbs heavier than ND Miata.

-Requires valve adjustment every few years.

-Aero on them is minimal at best and they have no real underbody aero. I only mention this because I've heard people complain about lift at high speeds on track. I have no first hand experience with this, but its worth mentioning.

-They have a tendency to over-steer on track, although not as bad as the earlier AP1 (2000-2003) models. People frequently put large front and rear spoilers on them in order to improve track stability, which I would like to stay away from- Because Streetcar.

-Side-ways flat-bill hat crowd worships them, which can lead to a lot of unwanted attention.

-They're frequently stolen, or at least the seats are stolen out of them a lot. Granted, I garage my cars, but its something worth mentioning.

-May have to travel out of state in order to find a “unicorn” level car I'm looking for.

ND Miata Pros:

-Brand new car= no need to worry about abuse from former owner(s)!

-500 lbs lighter. This means that not only will the car have a slight handling advantage, it means that it will be easier on tires, easier on brakes and if you add power, every pony will go a bit further in increasing power/weight ratio.

-The more mid-range friendly motor will likely make the car more around-town friendly as well, which is evidenced by the car's slightly quicker 5-60mph time.

-The motor seems to leave quite a bit left on the table. With a header & tune it looks like people are seeing ~25-30hp gains out of them. As such, its straight line speed disadvantage might be mitigated pretty drastically with just a few bolt-ons.

-Better fuel economy- 27/34mpg vs 20/25mpg.

-The new ND is probably the better looking car in my eyes; although I like both of them.

-More modern car with more modern features.

-Smaller tires & brakes will mean its cheaper to feed long term.

-While unproven due to being new, it will likely be reliable in stock form.

-Slight front weight bias will likely make the car a bit easier to handle at the limit.

-The community! Seriously, after owning 2 Miata's (1990 NA & 2004 MSM) and being a part of more car communities than I care to admit over the years, the Miata community is pretty tough to beat!

ND Miata Cons:

-It will likely cost more money overall/higher initial purchase price.

-It will depreciate over time, unlike the S2000 which is now appreciating.

-Slower in stock form both in a straight line and around race tracks as per online publications I've read. I'm not sure about autoX.

-Lots of body roll in stock form, based on all reviews.

-4-lug wheels might limit wheel selection somewhat.

-There isn't much of an aftermarket yet.... but within 1-2 years I'm sure it will be huge.

-Direct injection is already starting to show signs of long term carbon build-up in the new ND. As such, removing the intake manifold and cleaning the valves will likely be a good idea every few years.

-I highly doubt the engine in the Miata will be anywhere near as rev-happy and fun as the S2000's engine. I'm sure the chassis, shifter and tranny will be great, but not the 2.0L NA motor that is found in the base Mazda 3 as well.

-While specs disagree, I have a feeling that the S2000 will likely have more interior space. I might be wrong though.

-New/unproven platform. Will likely take some time to see what does and doesn't work on them.

I still haven't driven the new ND yet, although I have sat in one.... I tried to drive one a couple times this past summer but they were sold out of all my local dealerships, so I figured I would wait for a few months for the hype to go down and dealers to stock the cars I'm looking for (Club with a manual transmission)... Here lately it seems like every time my schedule is open and I would have time for a thorough test drive we've had a snow storm! I will definitely be driving an ND once the weather here gets nicer, but as of now all I have to go on is the long list of reviews on the Internet.

I'm wondering if anyone on here has owned both, or at least has driven both thoroughly? If so, I would really enjoy hearing thoughts, opinions and recommendations on both cars! I'll eventually drive the ND and attempt to do so back to back with an AP2 S2000 (if possible), but I figured I would ask questions and do some research on both in the meantime. Any shared experiences with both cars would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance!

-Brandon

Harvey
Harvey GRM+ Memberand Dork
12/27/15 1:50 p.m.

Drive the ND Miata, see if you like it better. That's the only way to decide.

BoxheadTim
BoxheadTim GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
12/27/15 1:51 p.m.

I've driven both, and I currently own an ND (although mine's the launch edition, so it's GT spec, not Sport).

If you give any thought to being competitive in Auto-X, check if the classing has been released for the ND yet with the club you're running with. I personally wouldn't want any unwelcome surprises that way.

Also, there is no comparison engine-wise. The S2000 engine is a gem in both AP1 and AP2 forms, whereas, well, let's just say the engine in the ND isn't necessarily the car's best feature. Coming from an N/A NA, it's actually nice and much torquier, but there is no comparison. That said, apparently BBR in the UK has been able to really wake up the engine with a remap/header/exhaust so I would expect there is more to come. But even then, IIRC they're getting about 190 out of the 2L, Honda gets 240 stock.

Headroom in both is fairly marginal if you like sitting upright, and in both cases if you're anything like my size (5'11"), your noggin will stick out above the factory roll protection. Depending on who puts up the HPDE, the S2000 might have a big advantage over the ND because you can get hardtops for it. You can't for the ND, at least not at the moment. There's also more choice when it comes to rollbars for the S2000, but the usual suspects are beginning to build rollbars for the ND, too. I know Blackbird Fabworx has one, and after owning one of his rollbars for the NA I'd happily buy another one.

Fuel economy on the ND is spectacular - mine is more a weekend toy and I've used it mostly for longer trips. Lifetime average mpg over 3000 miles so far is a bit over 40mpg.

I don't think you would chose wrong with either car. A nice S2000 has the bonus of appreciationg to go for it, but then again if you have a really nice one, you probably don't want to take it to the track.

LuxInterior
LuxInterior Reader
12/27/15 2:02 p.m.

To me, they are very different beasties. The S2k is heavier and feels it. The 8k+ engine note is fun though. The MX5 feels more nimble and light on it's feet. The MX-5's engine feels much less special than the S2k's, but the torque of the MX5 makes it feel more usable in traffic.

Short answer: Drive both back-to-back and see which produces the biggest smile.

Slippery
Slippery GRM+ Memberand Dork
12/27/15 2:15 p.m.

If you want an S2000, get it now. They are not being made anymore and it will be harder and harder to find a good one as time passes.

You can probably buy it, get it out of your system and sell it in a year for the same amount you bought it for.

Then buy the ND.

roninsoldier83
roninsoldier83 GRM+ Memberand New Reader
12/27/15 3:11 p.m.

Valid points! Local dealers seem to actually have a few ND's in stock; now all I need to do is wait for the snow to melt off of the roads and for temps to go a bit! It might be a while...

Slippery- good point! From a logical perspective the S2000 makes more sense due to a lack of depreciation, if nothing else. My biggest reservation is the "smiles per hour" factor of each car, as ultimately buying a weekend/toy car is really more of an emotional decision in the end.

Have any of you guys driven both? Preferably back to back or at least under similar conditions?

Thanks again guys!

Slippery
Slippery GRM+ Memberand Dork
12/27/15 3:24 p.m.

Never driven the ND, but own a 2006 S2000 since new. With three kids I rarely have time to drive it, but given how much fun it is and how little it is depreciating (it actually might be appreciating) I just hold on to it.

BoxheadTim
BoxheadTim GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
12/27/15 5:04 p.m.
roninsoldier83 wrote: Have any of you guys driven both? Preferably back to back or at least under similar conditions?

cough

Third post in this thread. Just sayin'.

roninsoldier83
roninsoldier83 GRM+ Memberand New Reader
12/27/15 5:21 p.m.
BoxheadTim wrote:
roninsoldier83 wrote: Have any of you guys driven both? Preferably back to back or at least under similar conditions?
*cough* Third post in this thread. Just sayin'.

Haha, sorry buddy, I wasn't very articulate! What I meant to ask was if anyone had driven both in a spirited manner or competition setting? What are your impressions from behind the wheel of both?

It looks like you already voted with your wallet, which is a pretty big statement! Did you consider buying an S2000 prior to the ND? If so, what, if anything swayed you one way or another?

Thank you!

BoxheadTim
BoxheadTim GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
12/27/15 6:00 p.m.

Competition setting, not yet, spirited driving oh yes .

I've nearly bought three S2000s so far and I know I'll buy one someday, but at this point in time I need another convertible like the proverbial hole in the head. Got too many already and not enough semi-practical cars.

They're very different but similar cars. The S2000 feels like Honda took a good look at the NA/NB Miata and decided to build one with all knobs turned to 11. It's much more manic, but driving it like you stole it is very rewarding. Downside is that you lose a lot of that fun factor when you're driving in a manner that local law enforcement seems to prefer.

The ND is a little more tame, but IMHO that makes it more fun to drive when you're not out to set a new unofficial lap time when canyon carving. It's not as rev happy as the S2k and at least until the engine is broken in completely and has loosened up a tad, mine doesn't really like to rev. With mine I doubt I've ever redlined it, I usually get the "this is pointless" feel somewhere between 5000 and 5500 and change up. That might be different on an Auto-X course, though.

The only thing more manic in the two-seat convertible formula I've driven so far is a Caterham 7, which was actually the car I was cross-shopping with the ND this year, not the S2000. It's in a different league compared to both though and even less practical.

The reasons we ended up with the ND were a) my wife really liked the ND and wasn't so hot on the Caterham and b) we like to have one vehicle that has a warranty as I'm notorious for taking a car to my mechanic and get the reaction "funny, I've never seen one of those go wrong".

sesto elemento
sesto elemento Dork
12/27/15 7:00 p.m.

Neither, my $25k buys a slightly beat supra, then I de-molest it, rock it for as long as I want to, make money when I'm done.

Feedyurhed
Feedyurhed SuperDork
12/27/15 7:04 p.m.

Like them both. A lot. My answer. ND. As soon as the PRHT (power retractable hard top) comes out. I am in one.

Feedyurhed
Feedyurhed SuperDork
12/27/15 7:06 p.m.
sesto elemento wrote: Neither, my $25k buys a slightly beat supra, then I de-molest it, rock it for as long as I want to, make money when I'm done.

Great solution but different animal. Topless is a whole different experience.

sesto elemento
sesto elemento Dork
12/27/15 7:36 p.m.

targa= solved

sesto elemento
sesto elemento Dork
12/27/15 7:42 p.m.

or....

Build a WICKED mr2spyder. $25k builds a sorted, 2zzge/c60 turbo car, with lsd, nice coilovers (like ohlins), the right wheels, seats, steering wheel, chassis bracing, all of it. Deep in the 11s, ftd most places you'll run, and an involving, challenging streetcar.

Keith Tanner
Keith Tanner GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
12/27/15 8:12 p.m.

FYI, the Bilstein suspension on the ND Club is more of a liability than a benefit. Best performance/fun bang for the buck in the ND is probably a Sport with an LSD swap and Fox suspension.

DaveEstey
DaveEstey PowerDork
12/27/15 8:52 p.m.

I don't fit in the s2000, the transmission tunnel is too damn wide. I fit fine in all Miatae. Only reason I don't own an ND is because I really like my low mileage NC.

dj
dj Reader
12/27/15 10:50 p.m.

Ap1

Test drive both and let us know what you think.

WildScotsRacing
WildScotsRacing Reader
12/27/15 11:17 p.m.
Keith Tanner wrote: FYI, the Bilstein suspension on the ND Club is more of a liability than a benefit. Best performance/fun bang for the buck in the ND is probably a Sport with an LSD swap and Fox suspension.

Please clarify and quantify the issues with the facory Bilstein setup, if you don't mind. I'm looking into getting an ND sometime in the next year and it WOULD see some track days. Also, is Mazda flat out refusing to build a Sport with the LSD factory installed, not even special ordered?

roninsoldier83
roninsoldier83 GRM+ Memberand New Reader
12/27/15 11:28 p.m.
BoxheadTim wrote: Competition setting, not yet, spirited driving oh yes . I've nearly bought three S2000s so far and I know I'll buy one someday, but at this point in time I need another convertible like the proverbial hole in the head. Got too many already and not enough semi-practical cars. They're very different but similar cars. The S2000 feels like Honda took a good look at the NA/NB Miata and decided to build one with all knobs turned to 11. It's much more manic, but driving it like you stole it is very rewarding. Downside is that you lose a lot of that fun factor when you're driving in a manner that local law enforcement seems to prefer. The ND is a little more tame, but IMHO that makes it more fun to drive when you're not out to set a new unofficial lap time when canyon carving. It's not as rev happy as the S2k and at least until the engine is broken in completely and has loosened up a tad, mine doesn't really like to rev. With mine I doubt I've ever redlined it, I usually get the "this is pointless" feel somewhere between 5000 and 5500 and change up. That might be different on an Auto-X course, though. The only thing more manic in the two-seat convertible formula I've driven so far is a Caterham 7, which was actually the car I was cross-shopping with the ND this year, not the S2000. It's in a different league compared to both though and even less practical. The reasons we ended up with the ND were a) my wife really liked the ND and wasn't so hot on the Caterham and b) we like to have one vehicle that has a warranty as I'm notorious for taking a car to my mechanic and get the reaction "funny, I've never seen one of those go wrong".

Thanks for the feedback! That's exactly the kind of feedback I'm looking for!

The S2000's you drove, were they AP1's, AP2's or both? I've driven both and the AP2 certainly seemed a less manic/more streetable car.

I hear you on the having 1 vehicle under warranty! My daily is a 2015 WRX that I picked up about a year ago; its bone stock and staying that way for several years to come. I learned my lesson several years back- I no longer modify my car that I need to depend on for daily transportation! I leave my wrenching and hooning to weekend play-toy cars!

roninsoldier83
roninsoldier83 GRM+ Memberand New Reader
12/27/15 11:36 p.m.
sesto elemento wrote: Neither, my $25k buys a slightly beat supra, then I de-molest it, rock it for as long as I want to, make money when I'm done.

Most of the turbo MK4 Supra's around here go for ~$40k unless they have a blown motor or some other major ailment. That and its not the cup of tea I'm looking for. The Supra is a 3400+ lbs turbo coupe.... I'm looking at <2800 lbs NA roadsters! I've owned and driven several powerful sports coupes; they certainly have their place and plenty of appeal, but an agile, lightweight drop-top they are not! Different animals in my book. If I was looking to spend MK4 turbo Supra money on a car (~$40K), I would likely be looking at something with a Lotus badge on the front of it!

roninsoldier83
roninsoldier83 GRM+ Memberand New Reader
12/27/15 11:48 p.m.
sesto elemento wrote: or.... Build a WICKED mr2spyder. $25k builds a sorted, 2zzge/c60 turbo car, with lsd, nice coilovers (like ohlins), the right wheels, seats, steering wheel, chassis bracing, all of it. Deep in the 11s, ftd most places you'll run, and an involving, challenging streetcar.

When I was initially on the hunt, I considered the MR2 Spyder and actually drove 2 of them. The first one shredded a drive-belt during a fairly mild test drive, but didn't impress me much prior to that incident.... I figured I shouldn't let an old belt and a bad experience sour me on a platform, so I gave the car a second chance. The 2nd car I drove rotated very well, but other than that, I wasn't very impressed. The word "floppy" came to mind a lot during that drive, as there was quite a bit of chassis flex. Both of my old Miata's felt more solid.... I know the NB Miata crushed the MR2 Spyder in the sales department and after those test drives, I understood why, as I walked away thinking "I would rather have another Miata".

Don't get me wrong, I can see the appeal of the MK2 Spyder- very lightweight, lots of interior space for its size, rear-engine placement, ect. On paper, it looks like a purist's dream! In real life I felt like the car lacked character and solidity. I'm sure that with enough modification those issues could be addressed, but that's true of a lot of cars out there.

I say this as a former SW20 1991 MR2 Turbo owner: I like MR2's, but I just didn't think the Spyder had much character.

roninsoldier83
roninsoldier83 GRM+ Memberand New Reader
12/27/15 11:54 p.m.
Keith Tanner wrote: FYI, the Bilstein suspension on the ND Club is more of a liability than a benefit. Best performance/fun bang for the buck in the ND is probably a Sport with an LSD swap and Fox suspension.

Thanks for chiming in Keith! Advice duly noted! If I end up with an ND I'm sure you and I will be in contact once you guys start pumping out parts for them!

DaveEstey wrote: I don't fit in the s2000, the transmission tunnel is too damn wide. I fit fine in all Miatae. Only reason I don't own an ND is because I really like my low mileage NC.

I actually thought the S2000 had more interior space than both of my old Miata's.... or maybe I was just more comfortable in it?!? I guess that's a drawback of the S2000's engine placement- putting it that far back in the engine bay forces them to place the transmission well into the passenger compartment.

dj wrote: Ap1 Test drive both and let us know what you think.

Will do! Just as soon as all of the snow is off the roads and temps get a bit higher outside!

Keith Tanner
Keith Tanner GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
12/28/15 12:44 a.m.
WildScotsRacing wrote:
Keith Tanner wrote: FYI, the Bilstein suspension on the ND Club is more of a liability than a benefit. Best performance/fun bang for the buck in the ND is probably a Sport with an LSD swap and Fox suspension.
Please clarify and quantify the issues with the facory Bilstein setup, if you don't mind. I'm looking into getting an ND sometime in the next year and it WOULD see some track days. Also, is Mazda flat out refusing to build a Sport with the LSD factory installed, not even special ordered?

Quantify? No, sorry. I can't provide A/B comparisons of lap times or other quantifiable results of the Club vs the Sport/GT suspension at this time - we got our Club after our GT, and it had a date with SEMA so it didn't get a chance to go to the track before it was torn down. That Club suspension is currently installed in our GT, and it's annoying.

Anyhow, it's...unsettled. It's got the typical "Bilstein jiggle", with the car fidgeting all the time. All the fluidity that makes the GT really work is gone. The car is always moving around. I think it's a lot of high speed compression damping. The car does roll less, but I'd hate to run it hard down one of our rocking and rolling mountain roads that show what a suspension really does. It's the sort of suspension that feels "sporty" on a test drive but disappoints with extended exposure.

I can make the car ride better with improved body control with 4x times the spring rate. I personally would not have signed off on the ND Club suspension.

Mazda gets Bilstein suspensions wrong more often than not. The only one that I'd consider leaving on a car would be the 2013-15 version. The 1993-97 was awful, the 1999-05 was okay but not great, the 2006-08 was atrocious with the 2009-12 a bit better.

One-off Miatas are pretty hard to come by. It's not that hard to swap an LSD into a Sport, the parts are available. Personally, I'd order a non-Brembo Club for my own use because I like the accompanying options. Then I'd tear out the suspension and replace it along with a set of our Wilwood brakes. Coincidentally, you'd never guess what's in my driveway right now...

I have driven an S2000 on the street but not the track. It was an AP1, and it struck me as a car that couldn't be exploited on the street - and I'm someone who thinks a V8 Miata can. It's the nature of the engine. I feel the same way about the FD RX-7.

Don49
Don49 HalfDork
12/28/15 6:19 a.m.

Re: warranty, I bought my S2000 from a Honda dealer and got a Honda used car warranty that was good for 5 years and 100k. I used the warranty 1 time for a sticky rear caliper, other than that the car has been flawless and a blast to drive. In 40k miles I have replaced the rear tires 2 times and still have the same fronts although I don't spin the tires. I think the comments on the lack of torque mid range are as much a factor of how smooth and linear the power is as much as anything. I find the car easy and comfortable to drive around town, low speed etc. I am 6' 210# and fit very comfortably.

1 2 3

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
5z0bE1hDkQD779LnRSVQd1xr4DTaP2eVwNxtYKwYDP7rJXYXlWxNYaEO1MdNs29A