Ferrari took a 348, streched it, threw the Enzo motor in it, flappy paddles and the rest is history!
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2000-ferrari-enzo-prototype/#3733492
Ferrari took a 348, streched it, threw the Enzo motor in it, flappy paddles and the rest is history!
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2000-ferrari-enzo-prototype/#3733492
Not attractive. Looking better than an Enzo is not a difficult trick.
The 288 GTO is the real winner in just about every way, but for those who like development hacks - that's basically what the 288 GTO Evolutione is. The development car for the F40, built out of a 288 GTO.
m4ff3w wrote:JFX001 wrote: >Enzo But, I'd rather have an F40.I'd rather have a 288 GTO.
and I'd rather have a 308gts
Leave the gated 6 speed (or was it a 5 speed) from the 348 and I'll take it. Tons better than an Enzo...
While it may appear interesting, that's a powertrain development prototype, and I bet it's not that much fun to drive. Mainly- that hybrid chassis isn't a 348 OR an Enzo.
Probably quite the handful. In a no fun way.
92CelicaHalfTrac wrote: Is it wrong to like this eleventy billion times better than the Enzo?
It looks eleventy billion times better than the Enzo, not that that's very hard to do.
corytate wrote:m4ff3w wrote:and I'd rather have a 308gt/4JFX001 wrote: >Enzo But, I'd rather have an F40.I'd rather have a 288 GTO.
FTFY
Keith wrote: Not attractive. Looking better than an Enzo is not a difficult trick. The 288 GTO is the real winner in just about every way, but for those who like development hacks - that's basically what the 288 GTO Evolutione is. The development car for the F40, built out of a 288 GTO.
Needs more vents.
You'll need to log in to post.