Is it a sports coupe? A convertible? A utility vehicle? It’s all three.
This 1996 Suzuki X-90 offers its owners a unique and distinctive style with endless possibilities. For maschinenbau, one of our regular forum users, this compact bundle of choices gave him the perfect opportunity to take a break from track activities and open the …
Try to find one!
Markhogue said:Try to find one!
I thought they all had big Red Bull cans on the back.
That is a vehicle that I never ever understood. Ever.
In reply to Duke :
I still don't understand it either, but I'm having fun.
In reply to maschinenbau :
Fair enough. That's the point, after all.
maschinenbau said:In reply to Duke :
I still don't understand it either, but I'm having fun.
Me when I'm trying to describe why I like cars so much.
I know where there’s one locally–and, no, not parked for good, either.
I've actually been thinking about them recently, and how one would be a near ideal car for me - I rarely have passengers or cargo, it has four wheel drive so it would be good in the winter, and I live in the city where traffic is tight and parking is at a premium so its small size would be an advantage.
In reply to stuart in mn :
I think a Tracker or Sidekick would be more reasonable; same thing with a back seat and cargo area, without being any bigger. But we are not reasonable people, we are GRM people.
maschinenbau said:In reply to stuart in mn :
I think a Tracker or Sidekick would be more reasonable; same thing with a back seat and cargo area, without being any bigger. But we are not reasonable people, we are GRM people.
They're OK too but I never have passengers so a back seat isn't necessary, and the most cargo I've carried in years has been nothing more than a couple bags of groceries. Also, they look more or less like conventional SUVs, just at 3/4 scale. The goofy shape of the X-90 kind of appeals to me.
You'll need to log in to post.
