Matt B (Forum Supporter) said:
This is a classic debate, but I'm interested to hear why you think the Bilstein's are better.
Ha! You might be right. I was active on MR2OC years ago for a good bit. I just go back there to search for existing threads now and then. Sometimes part-outs, etc. Good times though.
I live on the street, all magazines bring their cars and motorcyles to test. 2900 feet above sea level, lots of turns and lots of uphill and downhill. Matt Farah is here few times a week. Currently, 9 cars here in the stable. 8 run bilsteins, 1 run koni. Last 10 years, I haven't owned any car that didn't have bilstein. Prior to that lots of Teins, KYB, and Konis, and few Tokicos. So you may say I am "used to " Bilsteins last 10 years.
Comparing my own vehicles on the roads and speeds I travel, I find my Bilsteins much better dampened, and I prefer the shock rebound to the one in the koni. Bilstein turn in feels much crisper. I have played with the koni adjustments a lot, but I can't get the car anywhere close to how smooth the Bilsteins are. All of my vehicles run 100-200 tread rating.
We do HPDE, and run the Lotus challenge series with Bilsteins. I have take the GSR to one event, and it just wasn't as composed as the Bilstein cars (for lack of better word). I am going by my own feel, on my cars. I am not an engineer.
I rode in a Bilstein equipped ITR last week. My GSR has full OEM ITR suspension (except the shocks), and his car rode significatly better, on the same roads. If I keep the GSR few more months, I am going to dump the Koni and go back to the Bilsteins (which is what I should have done in the first place).
Yup been on MR2oc for many years with Bill Strong and the gang. I think 20+ years (have to check the join date). I also go there and Mr2.com if I have to search something. Though with MR2 ownership for almost 2 decades, I am pretty familiar with the cars :)
Definitely good times!