A coworker just told me that he was working in GM's specialty vehicles department in the early 2000's when he saw a concept car similar to this one. "What is it?" he asked. "This is what the Aztek was supposed to be," he was told. After the bean counters and managers (same thing really) got done with it, we ended up with this:
Can you believe it?
yep... every concept vehicle is usually 100x cooler than what actually gets produced
On the downside it would have kickstarted the hellaflush gangstamobile on dubz style a few years early.
There's a thread here, trying to get out. What cars had loads of promise at the prototype stage, and then.....?
A friend's dad worked on the Pacer project. It was originally slated to be a technologically advanced, rotary powered sporty coupe. And then......
I havea hard time believing that a vehicle that was supposed to be capable of anything from being a dd to a mini camper for a camping trip was based off THAT. I would believe thats what the street sport edition would have looked like.
GameboyRMH wrote: On the downside it would have kickstarted the hellaflush gangstamobile on dubz style a few years early.
And it would have died sooner as well. Take the pain, get it over with?
At least the Nissan Juke took over ugliest car honors from the Aztek. If Pablo Picasso designed a car it would look like the Juke.
Co-worker has an Aztek. He likes it a lot. I don't really think its nearly as bad as everyone likes to joke about on the internet. I kind of like it for what it is.
Pretty much every car can look better lowered, with flares and really nice wheels. But even the car in the original post is a styling mess.
I think the early Aztek's deserve all the crap people give them. But the later cars with body colored panels and bumpers look a lot less homely.
Otto Maddox wrote: But even the car in the original post is a styling mess.
Exactly. Carrot Top looked better before the plastic surgery, but he was still ugly.
Here's the original article from 2003:
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20030929/FREE/309290708
By: John D. Stoll on 9/29/2003 BY THE TIME MARK REUSS reached the age of 36, people were criticizing his work with gusto. Why not? He, a GM vehicle line executive, was given the task of shepherding into production one of the ugliest, most misconceived vehicles to ever see an assembly line: the Pontiac Aztek.
The rest is history. Literally. Expect to see Aztek buried next fall or soon after.
First, though, Reuss—now holding the enviable reigns of GM’s Performance Division—gets a Bob Lutz-mandated shot at redemption using the ill-fated SUV as inspiration. We can think of plenty of better ways for the General to spend dollars, but none more ironic.
A spec sheet sent to us lists Reuss and Co.’s project as the "Ultimate Aztek," so that’s what we’ll call it. Essentially, it’s a race car-cum-Pontiac-Vibe on steroids.
Above the beltline, the truck is true to Aztek heritage, although the origami rear end has been angled downward, rounded out a bit and fitted with a new spoiler. Door handles, mirrors and front fascia also get fittingly refashioned.
Flared fenders swoop over the wheel wells —complete with gill-slit vents—and positively dominate the design. Twenty-two-inch rims and 295/25 Z-rated treads fill the wells and two pairs of four-inch exhaust tips emerge ahead of the rear wells. Below the grille, a pair of fog lights bookend a lemon-wedge screen behind which sits a C5 racing radiator and other modifications.
All this bodywork does a lot to address the tippy-tall disproportion of the original design, but it is those other modifications that are really what’s worth getting giddy over.
The Ultimate’s firewall has been moved and Reuss ripped out all underhood nonessentials in order to fit the same 7.0-liter aluminum pushrod V8 that powers the C5-R in the cradle. In this case, output was wrenched up to 665 hp with torque at 625 lb-ft. Torque pushes at or near its peak through an intoxicating if straight curve starting at about 4000 rpm through 6800. Air is funneled to the engine through dual tapered conical filters lending the engine bay the same comic, come-get-me invitation as those Dolce & Gabbana bras gave Madonna during her infamous Girlie Show Tour.
Acceleration inspires an eruption of sound and plenty of cabin vibration, as well it should. A modified instrument cluster includes "pro series" gauges for oil pressure, water temperature, volts, speed and engine rpm. Virtually everything else inside you would operate or touch is custom, including front racing seats, abbreviated rear bench, carpet, racing-grade shifter and wheel, and the necessary plethora of "don’t touch without asking" switches. Sorry, no radio, a/c or cupholders. If a six-point roll cage and racing belts don’t convince occupants that this Aztek is for real, nothing will.
A modified six-speed manual with a heavy-duty clutch is mated to the engine, sending power solely to the rear wheels. You really have to thread your way through clutch engagement and be attentive or stalling is inevitable. A bit of jerking is to be expected; we didn’t stall, but we stunk up the cabin once with burning clutch odors. Once was enough. Another smell you’ll encounter is that of 100 octane fuel, required and distributed via a high-pressure fuel pump and racing-type fuel cell.
To further the Le Mans-wolf-in-Aztek-clothing argument, consider the remaining spec sheet. The 36-inch power rack-and-pinion, again heavy-duty, is fitted with steering arm adapters to allow the use of spherical rod ends in place of standard tie rods. Front suspension is a C5 double-wishbone setup with polyurethane bushings, while rear is five-link with adjustable coil-over triple adjustable shocks. Modular antiroll bar assemblies dress the front and rear, as do a pair of 2.5-inch diameter coil springs. There is no official word on how much this thing is lowered, but even the gravel road to your summer cabin is out of the question.
Of course we asked about the potential of ever seeing anything remotely close to this put in production, and Reuss calmed our fears by saying, "None." Still, we wouldn’t mind seeing this little model pace a lap or two, just for the giggle factor. After that, we’d be content to see the word "ultimate" applied in its other sense: last of a series.
Argo1 wrote: At least the Nissan Juke took over ugliest car honors from the Aztek. If Pablo Picasso designed a car it would look like the Juke.
Literally LOL at work. I would suggest that if Pablo Picasso had gouged out his eye instead of cutting off his ear, that would be even more true. And perhaps if he saw the Juke that would have happened.
In reply to Tyler H:
I think Picasso had both ears. Vincent Van Gogh lost one.
Tyler H wrote:Argo1 wrote: At least the Nissan Juke took over ugliest car honors from the Aztek. If Pablo Picasso designed a car it would look like the Juke.Literally LOL at work. I would suggest that if Pablo Picasso had gouged out his eye instead of cutting off his ear, that would be even more true. And perhaps if he saw the Juke that would have happened.
Picasso didn't cut off his ear. Van Gogh did.
edit beat me to it!
No, not Picasso, Dali.
boo....I knew that didn't sound right. I even checked Google quickly. Damn the internet hive mind. I've got to quit huffing lead based paint. The should have called the Aztek the VanGo'h.
cwh wrote: No, not Picasso, Dali.
This. If it was by Picasso it would have had a drive wheel on the roof, the tailpipe coming on the window, and a headlight under the car.
93EXCivic wrote:cwh wrote: No, not Picasso, Dali.This. If it was by Picasso it would have had a drive wheel on the roof, the tailpipe coming on the window, and a headlight under the car.
That's the Juke, isn't it?
The Aztek always looked like something from the PlaySkool line of toys. The cool pic at the top looks like something from the latest Hot Wheels collection. Meh. I guess I'd rather drive a Hot Wheels cartoon than a PlaySkool cartoon. But, really, I'd rather not drive a cartoon.
That was the Aztek concept car.
Agree with Adrian_Thompson, the later ones looked better. The thing is, people who bought one tended to really like them. Wheezy GM V6 aside, they drove pretty well and were useful. IMHO the Juke and Murano are far uglier, but you know the joke: "Your opinion is wrong." 
You'll need to log in to post.
