John Brown
John Brown GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
3/3/09 9:16 a.m.

http://www.motorcities.com/vehicle/09C1I403330409.html

2010 Volkswagen Polo - World Premiere in Geneva

The New Polo – World Premiere at the 2009 Geneva Motor Show

The new Polo is one of the safest cars worldwide; Polo's TDI and TSI engines noticeably reduce fuel costs

Wolfsburg / Geneva, 02 March 2009 - No other car in this class has such a mature and high-end image as the new Polo. Comfort, quality and safety have all taken a considerable leap forward. One example: the Polo was specifically designed to attain the recently established, stricter and more comprehensive, 5-star EuroNCAP rating. The higher structural rigidity of the Polo's bodyshell contributes to these results. In the footwell area alone, intrusion – related to the car body's deformation strength in a frontal crash – was lowered by 50 percent! In the case of a side impact, the intrusion value was reduced by 20 percent.

Standard equipment for safety

In addition, the European version of the Polo now being presented is equipped with standard ESP electronic stabilization program with Hill Hold Control, and it has a highly effective network of airbags on board, including combined head-thorax airbags (integrated in the front seatbacks), belt tensioners and belt force limiters plus seatbelt warning indicator and head restraints that counteract the risk of whiplash injury (both front seats), three rear head restraints and Isofix child seat preparation.

Weight down, fuel consumption down

Despite significant improvements in all aspects of the car, it was possible to reduce the Polo's body weight by 7.5 percent. The introduction of new TDI and TSI engines, as well as the 7-speed dual clutch transmission (DSG), has resulted in considerably reduced fuel consumption and emissions over a wide range of engine power outputs. An excellent example here is the new 1.2 TSI. This turbo-charged four-cylinder direct injection gasoline engine produces 77 kW / 105 PS, yet it consumes just 5.5 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (129 g/km CO2); this is 19 percent less than on the equivalent model of the previous generation!

In total, seven different engines will be offered on the new Polo in its first year – four gasoline and three diesel – spanning a power range from 44 kW / 60 PS to 77 kW / 105 PS. Five of these engines are entirely new or are being used for the first time in the Polo.

The new engines include all three TDIs (turbo-diesel direct-injection); thanks to the implementation for the first time of common rail technology in the Polo, these engines are both efficient and refined. The potential in the new TDI engines is clearly evident in the example of the Polo 1.6 TDI with 66 kW / 90 PS: when combined with a "BlueMotion package", its average fuel consumption of 3.8 liters per 100 kilometers and 96 g/km CO2 makes it the most fuel efficient and lowest emitting five-seater diesel in the world. The "BlueMotion package" may be combined with any of the three equipment lines developed for the Polo. Available for selection here are the base version "Trendline", the mid-level "Comfortline" and the top of the line "Highline".

Individually combinable high-tech features

Options that Polo drivers will be able to order on their new Volkswagen include static turning lights integrated in the front fog lights, (from "Comfortline" up), side curtain airbags (head airbag system for front and rear passengers), radio and radio-navigation systems and integrated hands-free telephone systems. A panorama sunroof and bi-xenon headlights will follow at a later time.

Market launch starts the end of June

Start of production of the five-door Polo is scheduled for the end of March. This will be followed, starting in the last week in June, by the market launch of the visually and technically advanced new edition of the million unit bestseller in Germany. Just two weeks later, thanks to an ambitious logistics plan, Volkswagen will begin selling the car across mainland Europe, and soon Polo engines will be revving up across all continents.

All data and equipment contained in this press release apply to models offered in Germany. They may differ in other countries. All information is subject to change or correction. TDI, TSI, DSG and Twincharger are registered trademarks of Volkswagen AG or other companies of the Volkswagen Group in Germany and other countries.

ignorant
ignorant SuperDork
3/3/09 9:29 a.m.

I would entertain buying one.

Jensenman
Jensenman SuperDork
3/3/09 9:45 a.m.

'Quality is much improved'. VW has had nowhere to go but up.

MPG figures aren't bad, the gas motor shows about 43 MPG and the diesel 62 MPG. Under perfect conditions, of course.

ManofFewWords
ManofFewWords Reader
3/3/09 9:54 a.m.

What are the main differences between this and the Rabbit?

4cylndrfury
4cylndrfury Reader
3/3/09 9:56 a.m.
ManofFewWords wrote: What are the main differences between this and the Rabbit?

the name for starters

Stuc
Stuc HalfDork
3/3/09 10:00 a.m.

Damn even looks good for a flatback hatch..

Mmmm.... 7 speed DSG....

By the way, anyone who is still skeptical about this go to your local dealer and just test drive a GTI to see how amazing this thing is.

edit: Don't buy it though because it's ugly.

RossD
RossD New Reader
3/3/09 10:01 a.m.

Top Gear had the 3 cylinder diesel on last night. Got more than 750 miles on one tank of fuel. Thats the difference between it and the rabbit. Of course the second most fuel efficient car happens to be the Jaguar twin turbo v6 diesel ... according to Jeremy at least. The diesel subaru didnt make it.

gamby
gamby SuperDork
3/3/09 10:16 a.m.
RossD wrote: Top Gear had the 3 cylinder diesel on last night. Got more than 750 miles on one tank of fuel.

Yeah, that was a neat little car. I can't imagine there's much of a difference in useability between my old 70hp Civic CX and that VW. There's no reason it couldn't work here.

dyintorace
dyintorace GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
3/3/09 10:22 a.m.
RossD wrote: Top Gear had the 3 cylinder diesel on last night. Got more than 750 miles on one tank of fuel. Thats the difference between it and the rabbit. Of course the second most fuel efficient car happens to be the Jaguar twin turbo v6 diesel ... according to Jeremy at least. The diesel subaru didnt make it.

How on earth did Jeremy make it that far given the all out assault on fuel economy through France?!? He had the hammer down and still made it? The expected range was should have only been in the low 600's. I was amazed.

Volksroddin
Volksroddin HalfDork
3/3/09 10:23 a.m.
ManofFewWords wrote: What are the main differences between this and the Rabbit?

I am sure the Polo is smaller.

amg_rx7
amg_rx7 Reader
3/3/09 10:33 a.m.
dyintorace wrote:
RossD wrote: Top Gear had the 3 cylinder diesel on last night. Got more than 750 miles on one tank of fuel. Thats the difference between it and the rabbit. Of course the second most fuel efficient car happens to be the Jaguar twin turbo v6 diesel ... according to Jeremy at least. The diesel subaru didnt make it.
How on earth did Jeremy make it that far given the all out assault on fuel economy through France?!? He had the hammer down and still made it? The expected range was should have only been in the low 600's. I was amazed.

Me too! I was actually planning on Googling a bit to see if I can find out more about that.

skruffy
skruffy Dork
3/3/09 10:42 a.m.

Is this another cool fuel efficient car that we aren't allowed to buy here in the US?

ignorant
ignorant SuperDork
3/3/09 10:46 a.m.
amg_rx7 wrote:
dyintorace wrote:
RossD wrote: Top Gear had the 3 cylinder diesel on last night. Got more than 750 miles on one tank of fuel. Thats the difference between it and the rabbit. Of course the second most fuel efficient car happens to be the Jaguar twin turbo v6 diesel ... according to Jeremy at least. The diesel subaru didnt make it.
How on earth did Jeremy make it that far given the all out assault on fuel economy through France?!? He had the hammer down and still made it? The expected range was should have only been in the low 600's. I was amazed.
Me too! I was actually planning on Googling a bit to see if I can find out more about that.

I sense good television production made that range be longer.....

friedgreencorrado
friedgreencorrado Reader
3/3/09 11:04 a.m.
ManofFewWords wrote: What are the main differences between this and the Rabbit?

It's smaller. IIRC, it's about the size of my 2nd gen Golf.

Almost half of some of the boards over at vwvortex are guys like me whining that VW won't send its smaller cars to the US. Not being able to buy the Lupo/Polo over the years is why a lot of us Dub guys are still driving 15-20yr old cars.

ManofFewWords
ManofFewWords Reader
3/3/09 11:41 a.m.

What are the curb weights of the Polo and Rabbit?

RossD
RossD New Reader
3/3/09 12:59 p.m.
friedgreencorrado wrote:
ManofFewWords wrote: What are the main differences between this and the Rabbit?
It's smaller. IIRC, it's about the size of my 2nd gen Golf. Almost half of some of the boards over at vwvortex are guys like me whining that VW won't send its smaller cars to the US. Not being able to buy the Lupo/Polo over the years is why a lot of us Dub guys are still driving 15-20yr old cars.

I thought it was because you Dub guys were just cheap? j/k On a different note: What is the elevation at their starting point? I bet you'll see that they were going down hill, over all, untill the train atleast.

Opus
Opus HalfDork
3/3/09 6:47 p.m.
RossD wrote: Top Gear had the 3 cylinder diesel on last night. Got more than 750 miles on one tank of fuel. Thats the difference between it and the rabbit. Of course the second most fuel efficient car happens to be the Jaguar twin turbo v6 diesel ... according to Jeremy at least. The diesel subaru didnt make it.

That is because Capt Slow got lost as usual, but all they said is that he did not make it in time. No mention if he ran out of fuel though

friedgreencorrado
friedgreencorrado Reader
3/3/09 8:30 p.m.
RossD wrote:
friedgreencorrado wrote:
ManofFewWords wrote: What are the main differences between this and the Rabbit?
It's smaller. IIRC, it's about the size of my 2nd gen Golf. Almost half of some of the boards over at vwvortex are guys like me whining that VW won't send its smaller cars to the US. Not being able to buy the Lupo/Polo over the years is why a lot of us Dub guys are still driving 15-20yr old cars.
I thought it was because you Dub guys were just cheap? j/k

Not cheap, "frugal". We got a reputation to uphold..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHsYFCQizfk

OTOH, I see a lot of my Honda buddies stiking with their EG6 Civics, even though they could pick up a Fit for $15K.

On a different note: What is the elevation at their starting point? I bet you'll see that they were going down hill, over all, untill the train atleast.

I'm sorry. I'm a middle-aged guy, and don't understnd the question. Are you talking about the sales numbers?

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
42hvI5itjEISTeK7lUOte2xQOZ1RgwuKi8f36JVemu8vKyC6pKSUucNcCi9MwOFu