No surprise, really.
No surprise, really.
I find the Whitehouse response to the article even worse.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/06/07/fact-checking-fact-checker
Assuming i have a keen grasp of the English language (and i do), it would seem that in the White House's attempt to rebut the WP article, they ended up agreeing on at least half of the key points.
Great job proving the WP wrong, White House.
I am disappoint.
what a vacuous response from the whitehouse.
"here's how you SHOULD look at these fact; more favorably to us."
madmallard wrote: what a vacuous response from the whitehouse. "here's how you SHOULD look at these fact; more favorably to us."
Yep. They didn't even really challenge anything WP said, just tried to say it another way to make it LOOK like they were challenging... but ended up saying the same thing.
Way to go. What kind of idiots work there, again? Oh that's right, the kind that pretty much plagiarizes.
Frankly, I'm amazed we got even that much back from Chrysler.
You'll need to log in to post.
