Good afternoon Gents. I recently sold my sister-in-law's car for her, and have run into some wierdness and wanted to hear what the collective had to say.
The car in question is a '98 328i, with 240k kms, the sport package (such as it is), fresh shocks and brakes, and some visible rust. It was listed for $2800 with emissions test complete, and safety inspection to be negotiated with price.
A viewer came on Saturday, and very quickly came to the conclusion that she would buy it. We discussed price, and she agreed to purchase it for $2300 as-is with emissions test. She was going to the bank to get the money, and asked for the title to put it in her name and save one trip. I foolishly said ok to this, she left and came back with the car now in her name, $500 cash and a cheque for $1700. "The bank was closed, and $500 is my daily limit", she said. Then she said "I'm having second thoughts about buying it as-is, and would like to get the car inspected locally before I decide to buy it". (@#$@#$#) I asked what she planned to do if the results came back negative, and she declared that she'd get the car put back in my name. Strange. I asked about the cheque, and she assured me that there was no issue with a bouncing cheque. At this point, my spidey-sense is going nutty, but I told her she should bring it to the local Canadian Tire (the only local shop that was open on a Saturday afternoon). As she headed out, I called her bank and found that it was open and that her account had insufficient funds to clear the cheque. I tried calling - no answer. I drove to Canadian Tire, she wasn't there. I headed home and waited in the driveway, pondering my own stupidity.
1/2 hr later, she came by and declared that there was a problem - Canadian Tire had declared that the car needed $800 worth of work to pass the safety. The paper was hand written, which is unusual for this shop. I told her I had a problem with the cheque and her story about the bank - and mentioned that the cheque was $100 short. We agreed to adjust the price down to $2200, and that we'd drive to the bank to get the appropriate amount of cash. Done, finally, and it was a crappy Saturday as a result.
Or so I thought. She called on Monday and had the car inspected again, but this mechanic had declared that she over paid for the car, and that it needed way more work than mechanic one (third party) had declared. She insists that she's taking me to small claims court and that she should have only paid $1500 for the car. I said that I had already gone way beyond the norm in accomodating her after buying the car as-is, putting it in her name, and trying to change the terms. I also reminded her that she agreed to buy it as-is. I, frankly, was unaware of any issues with the car - as noted there is visible rust, but the car has been the epitome of reliablity for my sister-in-law, brakes shifts and drives great.
What say you? If she hadn't put the car in her name, I wouldn't have hesitated to give a full refund on the car - it's not hard to get $2200 for it in these parts, and the car had received a ton of attention in the one week it was on the market. Sorry for the tome, but this has been weighing on me....