SVreX said:
You have said you can’t stay on task, and jump around in other people’s work, and that you like to “improve the processes”.
You have not said you are a manager, and you have not said improving processes is ever part of your job.
Is a job change an option? Are those skills valuable in your role? Is improving the processes actually your job?
Kind of. I was hired at a more advanced level because I came with another companies knowledge behind me. My boss liked that I wasn't afraid to reach out to other supervisors to get opinions on how processes might be improved. I think as time has gone by, he wants less of that, mostly because organizational changes have absolutely wrecked some of our ways of doing things, both old and new. He's frustrated by the backsliding, and doesn't want us pissing anyone off.
It's hard to tell what he wants now. What he sees in my professional improvement. I think it's hard for him to see past the traditional measures of professionalism when considering what to task someone with. He sees tardiness, a loose mouth, someone who loses focus. To him, that's not someone to promote or give more responsibility. As a result, he's backing down on giving me new, more interesting tasks, things that might compliment my skills.
If your job is task oriented, and there are no opportunities for changing jobs to one that better suits your personality, you’d better start sucking it up and keeping your head down.
But if a change is possible, then by all means!
The company does do training, and we have about 6 positions who do that, with fairly regular turnover in those positions. The downside is they are more operationally focused. Training on how to do fittings, weld pipe, dig trenches, deal with emergencies, etc. They prefer folks with a construction background. Unfortunately, there is far more training that needs to be done on financial and business related systems. How to use a computer, write an email, navigate a work management system. Our company is slow to adopt "office technology" and even slower to train people on it. The stuff I would be best suited to train and give instruction we don't giving training and instruction on.
My dilemma is this: if I leave my current position but move to another higher position in the company, very little of my skills would transfer. Instead, my knowledge after 7 years in the industry would transfer. My boss has no incentive to "push" for me to move up to one of those roles, because he'd lose an employee, and one he wouldn't be quick to recommend to other supervisors.
There is one lateral position for me, but it's not commonly open, and only two of those positions exist.
Everything else is down (into union positions) or up, to positions my boss may not give recommendations to those hiring me.
Another dynamic is that my boss has got a daughter who has got 7 years left of grade school, and he has no intentions of leaving this company before then. Unfortunately, he also has little ability to grow in the company, because aside from the top spot, they want either an engineer or someone with operational experience he lacks.
I think my best option is to rebuild the relationship and bail on the best terms possible.