SVreX said:One more thing...
Sadly in my field, I am seeing a huge deterioration in the quality and security of the related desk jobs. Engineering and architecture jobs are dwindling fast, and the quality of the work we now get in the field is pathetic. We got far better drawings 20 years ago. There are a lot of reasons for that.
I am NOT seeing an deterioration in the need for quality tradesmen. In fact, I see a relation between the 2. As the professional roles deteriorate, the trades are expected to come up with field solutions that never used to be part of their job. The future for skilled tradesmen is gigantic.
I wish that wasn’t true, but it is.
The need for those professional design skills is different in other industries.
As someone who produces those drawings, I can understand where you're coming from. From my perspective in the pharma industry, the speed we are asked to design projects is outpacing the information we have to do the design. Mainly with regards to the specific process equipment involved, which is a bit of a chicken-egg situation:
A/E: we need equipment information
Vendor: we need a signed PO before we can design said equipment to give you anything.
A/E: can you maybe guess?
Vendor: Ok.
A/E: Thanks (then issues drawings)
Owner: Umm... we're going with a different vendor now than came in 12 cents cheaper.
New vendor: here's some preliminary design info.
A/E: this is totally different than the previous vendor and we have to completely re-engineer everything.
Owner: Why are we getting extras?
A/E: Why is my design staff quitting?