Woody
Woody GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
5/15/14 9:31 p.m.

Whoops...

http://www.courant.com/news/education/hc-ccsu-ravi-shankar-0516-20140515,0,5621067.story

Regents To Reconsider Promotion Of Jailed Professor

By KATHLEEN MEGAN, kmegan@courant.com The Hartford Courant

7:24 p.m. EDT, May 15, 2014

HARTFORD — The state Board of Regents for Higher Education plans to reconsider the decision it made Tuesday to promote a Central Connecticut State University professor after learning later this week that he is in jail.

Ravi Shankar, 39, a poet who was promoted from tenured associate professor to full professor on Tuesday, currently is serving a two-week segment of a 90-day "pre-trial confinement," period at the Hartford Correctional Center, his lawyer Jake Donovan said Thursday.

The regents have asked CCSU officials for "an immediate and full investigation" of the process that resulted in CCSU officials recommending Shankar for promotion, board spokesman Michael Kozlowski said Thursday.

The board is "deeply dismayed at the recent turn of events. … We believe that faculty and staff must be held to the highest standards inside as well as outside the classroom," Kozlowski said.

The regents plan to meet next week to decide whether to take any initial action, such as putting Shankar's promotion on hold, and will make a final decision once CCSU completes its investigation, Kozlowski said. The board has the authority to accept or reject a recommended promotion at the state's four regional universities.

Shankar's salary is $75,480; Kozlowski said it's uncertain how much his salary would increase with the promotion.

Jack Miller, president of Central Connecticut State University, said in a statement, "This is a very complex situation, but the simple answer is, it was my responsibility to inform the Board of Regents and I did not."

Miller said that at the time of the board vote, he wasn't aware that Shankar had been incarcerated. "I have asked my staff to conduct a full investigation of all the legal actions, when we knew of them, and the various processes involved."

Sen. Toni Boucher, R-Wilton, said in a statement that "the Board of Regents should be embarrassed. They should be doing background checks when considering a major promotion."

Sen. Kevin Witkos, R-Canton, said he was "shocked and appalled" to learn of Shankar's promotion while in prison and called on Regents President Gregory Gray to "immediately reverse" that decision. Gray wasn't available for comment Thursday, and several board members did not return phone calls.

Donovan said Shankar is in prison because he plea-bargained an agreement that will enable him to get a suspended sentence for violating probation related to two previous cases.

In the first case, Shankar was convicted for giving police a false statement in a credit card fraud scheme in 2011, involving the purchase of $22,000 worth of tickets to an international soccer game in New Jersey, and was sentenced to two years' probation. In the second case, Shankar pleaded no contest to charges of drunk-driving later that year. He was sentenced to six months in jail, which was suspended, and 18 months of probation.

Shankar was charged with violating probation in those cases in 2012, after his arrest for driving with a suspended license, failure to drive in the proper lane and criminal impersonation.

Donovan said Shankar has been serving the 90-day term in increments when he is able to do so during the past year. He's scheduled to be released from jail on Thursday, May 22, and then will have only six days left to serve.

Donovan, who is a former prosecutor, said this kind of a "pre-trial confinement" served in segments is not that unusual.

"It did allow him to structure the disposition" so that he could keep teaching, Donovan said. "It's a very fair disposition. He was not accorded any special treatment."

Had Shankar pleaded guilty and admitted to probation violations, Donovan said, he probably would have been sentenced to 90 days and served half of that.

"I need to stress that his legal situation is separate and distinct from his performance as a teacher," Donovan said. "By all accounts — and I've had quite a bit of contact with his colleagues, who hold him in great esteem — he's apparently very popular with students. He discharges his academic responsibilities quite admirably."

Donovan added: "This guy is no danger to anyone. These aren't crimes of violence. These aren't crimes of a sexual nature. There's nothing going on here. ..Some of our greatest poets, our greatest artists have had problems in life and they've overcome them. Hopefully, they'll see it that way."

Donovan said he doesn't know what university officials knew about Shankar's situation, "but there was no attempt to hide this at all."

Kozlowski said he has heard that Shankar "has tremendous student ratings, they like him very much, and that his academic record, at least as far as I know, is quite good."

Shankar, who has been at CCSU since 2003, is a professor and poet-in-residence at Central and co-directs the school's minor in creative writing.

In 2004 and in 2006, CCSU nominated him for the institution's excellence in teaching award. Shankar is also executive director of "Drunken Boat," an online outlet for international poetry reviews, and chairman of the Connecticut Young Writers Trust, a nonprofit foundation.

Andy Thibault, chairman emeritus of the foundation, said Shankar "is paying his dues, and he's committed to long-term community service on his own by keeping the Young Writers foundation going."

A statement from the foundation said it "firmly stands" by Shankar "as he pays his debt to society for personal mistakes wholly unrelated to his educational mission."

Fueled by Caffeine
Fueled by Caffeine MegaDork
5/15/14 10:33 p.m.

I left CT for Seattle.. Whats your excuse?

ThunderCougarFalconGoat
ThunderCougarFalconGoat Reader
5/16/14 6:34 a.m.

Wait, so he can just do a couple days in jail whenever it's convinent for him? Like an all expenses paid vacation?

I am doing it wrong.

The_Jed
The_Jed UltraDork
5/16/14 6:58 a.m.

Hey, if your parents are well connected and rich enough you can kill people with your car and get sent to pampered rehab.

Silver lining: The economy must be recovering quite well for a person to have a non-essential job that he doesn't even have to show up for and they'll not only throw $75k at him they'll give his disproportionately lucky ass a berkeleying promotion!

mtn
mtn UltimaDork
5/16/14 7:24 a.m.

Sad to see the famed sitar player sink so low.

Giant Purple Snorklewacker
Giant Purple Snorklewacker MegaDork
5/16/14 8:51 a.m.

It sounds like he does a fine job for his employer and was allowed to serve his punishment in a way that does not effect his ability to do so. If I got a reckless driving conviction for going 140 in a 35 and chose to do my 80hrs of community service so it wasn't conflicting with my ability to deliver on the job - should I be denied a promotion because I was picking up beer cans along I80 when they actually gave me the promotion?

This is only a problem because the newspaper says so.

Giant Purple Snorklewacker
Giant Purple Snorklewacker MegaDork
5/16/14 8:54 a.m.
ThunderCougarFalconGoat wrote: Wait, so he can just do a couple days in jail whenever it's convinent for him? Like an all expenses paid vacation? I am doing it wrong.

It is pre-sentence. Like people who get DUIs go to 30 day rehab and it counts as time served. So... if before you HAVE to go, you choose to - you can do it on your own terms as credit at sentencing. The judge can ignore it but for anything that is a "lifestyle" crime with no victim they never do. At least not in PA.

T.J.
T.J. PowerDork
5/16/14 9:05 a.m.

I don't think this Ravi Shankar is related to THE Ravi Shankar, but I just learned that Norah Jones is the daughter of THE Rave Shankar.

Giant Purple Snorklewacker
Giant Purple Snorklewacker MegaDork
5/16/14 9:07 a.m.
T.J. wrote: I don't think this Ravi Shankar is related to THE Ravi Shankar, but I just learned that Norah Jones is the daughter of THE Rave Shankar.

THE Ravi Shenkar is dead, the sentence began in 2012 and runs through pretty much forever.

Woody
Woody GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
5/16/14 9:13 a.m.
Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote:
T.J. wrote: I don't think this Ravi Shankar is related to THE Ravi Shankar, but I just learned that Norah Jones is the daughter of THE Rave Shankar.
THE Ravi Shenkar is dead, the sentence began in 2012 and runs through pretty much forever.

Actually, I'm pretty sure that he came back as nails on a chalkboard.

T.J.
T.J. PowerDork
5/16/14 9:53 a.m.

Yeah, I knew he was dead, but thought perhaps this guy was his son, but it doesn't appear so.

spitfirebill
spitfirebill PowerDork
5/16/14 10:30 a.m.

The guy is a poet. What poet wasn't berkeleyed up?

I noticed they did not refer to him as Dr. Shankar, so I guess he doesn't have a PhD. Yet he is making full perfesser

Maroon92
Maroon92 MegaDork
5/16/14 11:34 a.m.
The_Jed wrote: The economy must be recovering quite well for a person to have a non-essential job that he doesn't even have to show up for and they'll not only throw $75k at him they'll give his disproportionately lucky ass a berkeleying promotion!

Where did it say that he didn't show up for his job? He was serving his sentence in increments that allowed him to continue educating.

Also, I'd hardly call anyone in education a "non-essential". Have you seen the state of our education system lately?

I have literally no problem with the raise. I completely disagree with his decision to drive under the influence, but he's doing his time for that.

Giant Purple Snorklewacker
Giant Purple Snorklewacker MegaDork
5/16/14 11:56 a.m.

Pic unrelated:

HiTempguy
HiTempguy UltraDork
5/16/14 1:54 p.m.
Maroon92 wrote: I have literally no problem with the raise.

Drunk driving isn't a mistake, it is a choice. Do you think the guy really has the best attitude towards people when he was involved in a CREDIT CARD SCAMMING SCHEME?

So, I do have a problem with it, as do the people whose taxes probably pay part of his wages. An employee is a representative of the company, on the clock or off the clock. I wouldn't want that person working for me, no different than I wouldn't want a "insert addiction of choice" working for me.

xflowgolf
xflowgolf Dork
5/16/14 2:13 p.m.
Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote: It sounds like he does a fine job for his employer and was allowed to serve his punishment in a way that does not effect his ability to do so. If I got a reckless driving conviction for going 140 in a 35 and chose to do my 80hrs of community service so it wasn't conflicting with my ability to deliver on the job - should I be denied a promotion because I was picking up beer cans along I80 when they actually gave me the promotion? This is only a problem because the newspaper says so.

Yup

Matt B
Matt B SuperDork
5/16/14 3:07 p.m.
HiTempguy wrote:
Maroon92 wrote: I have literally no problem with the raise.
Drunk driving isn't a mistake, it is a choice. Do you think the guy really has the best attitude towards people when he was involved in a CREDIT CARD SCAMMING SCHEME? So, I do have a problem with it, as do the people whose taxes probably pay part of his wages. An employee is a representative of the company, on the clock or off the clock. I wouldn't want that person working for me, no different than I wouldn't want a "insert addiction of choice" working for me.

Getting a DUI doesn't make you an addict/alcoholic. Just stupid and arrogant.

About the CC fraud, I got nothin. I'm not sure if it was the identity-theft kind, but either way any kind of fraud makes my skin crawl.

That said, it's kinda hard to know the whole story from that article. He could be a master con-man or possibly just associated with the wrong people and didn't report them when shiz went down. A friend of mine got busted for that very crime many moons ago simply because he rang up a friend at his register that was using a stolen card. He didn't know it was stolen, but still made the mistake of letting his friend use a card that didn't have their name on it. Stupid? YES. Nefarious? Not really.

HiTempguy
HiTempguy UltraDork
5/16/14 4:06 p.m.
Matt B wrote: Getting a DUI doesn't make you an addict/alcoholic. Just stupid and arrogant.

And? You'd still hire someone who had a DUI? Good for you. Most people wouldn't, up here, it is a huge red flag when doing background checks for hiring.

codrus
codrus GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
5/16/14 6:39 p.m.
HiTempguy wrote:
Matt B wrote: Getting a DUI doesn't make you an addict/alcoholic. Just stupid and arrogant.
And? You'd still hire someone who had a DUI? Good for you. Most people wouldn't, up here, it is a huge red flag when doing background checks for hiring.

I think it depends a lot on the circumstances, there are a few people who get caught up in the zero-tolerance DUI world when it shouldn't have been a big deal. It indicates a lack of judgement, but it's possible to be basically a good and honest person, make a mistake like that and move on.

Credit card fraud, OTOH, is an entirely different story.

aircooled
aircooled UltimaDork
5/16/14 6:40 p.m.

Well, he's not a delivery driver. A DUI does not seem to have any relevance to his job (e.g. if he was an drug/alcohol counselor).

For the CC fraud, I think you would really need to now more about that before you make any assumptions (e.g. sex offender charges for peeing in public).

...seems a wee bit "get the noose" judgmental to me.

It's always best to try not to:

HiTempguy
HiTempguy UltraDork
5/17/14 5:43 p.m.
aircooled wrote: ...seems a wee bit "get the noose" judgmental to me.

You can run your business however you want. I wouldn't run one that way, and apparently the university board agrees with me.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
68Yrh4VpWd0sZMvS79HH2lpkp8e6Lhe2EKugG1mFR74fjTG3qD1qcwDpB8aHGHDJ