Wally
Wally GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
9/26/12 5:15 p.m.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/subway_jerk_wants_rap_thrown_out_xi9LO7ZZXciJFQV2ZrrVnI

Subway ‘jerk’ wants rap thrown out

He admits he masturbated in a crowded 1 train in 2002 — and that “some of it got on” a 14-year-old girl.

But 250-pound accused subway “grinder” Jason Mack — whose 2009 felony indictment was reduced to a misdemeanor in a precedent-setting appeal — is hoping now to win a total dismissal because prosecutors are still not ready for trial.

“You know, the train be crowded — it was rush hour — and the lady bumped me,” the giant jerker told a reporter after a brief Manhattan Supreme Court hearing yesterday, at which prosecutors said they were not ready and the defense filed papers asking that the case therefore be dropped. “I know my DNA came on her,” Mack added. I apologize for that. That won’t happen no more. I won’t do that again.”, explaining that he’d been drinking at the time

Although the disgusting crime occurred back in 2002, the stains from the victim’s jeans were not successfully matched to Mack until 2009, when he was charged with felony sex abuse.

Mack’s lawyers successfully argued all the way to the highest court in the state that mere masturbation — even in close proximity — was not technically an act of physical force against a victim, and therefore can only be charged as a misdemeanor.

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Renee White said she will decide on the proposed dismissal on Oct. 30.

Basil Exposition
Basil Exposition Reader
9/26/12 5:29 p.m.
Wally wrote: Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Renee White said she will decide on the proposed dismissal on Oct. 30.

I wonder how that will work out for him.

Anti-stance
Anti-stance SuperDork
9/26/12 5:38 p.m.

In reply to Basil Exposition:

carguy123
carguy123 PowerDork
9/26/12 6:23 p.m.

It might not be a physical act of force in NY, but in the civilized world......................

And he did apologize and promise not to do it again.....

DrBoost
DrBoost UberDork
9/26/12 6:41 p.m.
The disgusting piece of crap said: “I know my DNA came on her,”

Notice he didn't say that he ejaculated or her, or any other terminology that sounds horrible. He said it was only his DNA.

friedgreencorrado
friedgreencorrado PowerDork
9/26/12 9:16 p.m.
DrBoost wrote:
The disgusting piece of crap said: “I know my DNA came on her,”
Notice he didn't say that he ejaculated or her, or any other terminology that sounds horrible. He said it was only his DNA.

I'll bet two Euros that the guy had never heard about DNA before a conversation with his lawyer.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
krJCivpe8CD5rG8heWFedAYYq27E16rJImD89yGHN3xo1JkgU5nGWmp7dLF9CCsQ