http://news.msn.com/us/2-dead-candidates-get-majority-of-votes-in-wash
Thats pretty bad when deceased cantidates are still beating you.......
http://news.msn.com/us/2-dead-candidates-get-majority-of-votes-in-wash
Thats pretty bad when deceased cantidates are still beating you.......
dculberson wrote:GameboyRMH wrote: Let's see, less business for you, or a generation of poorly educated kids in your area, hmm... Maybe your land would become more valuable if the school district it's in wasn't so E36 M3ty?Seriously, that's what you took from my post? Are you trying to convince me of something or is it "be E36 M3ty to someone on the internet day?" I would clarify but I don't think you care since my position was pretty clearly stated and my internal conflict was made clear. You chose to ignore it. Edit: Maybe I was in a crappy mood and misinterpreted what you said. If so, I'm sorry.
It seemed like you were asking for opinions and I gave mine. I could have used gentler wording, but I could have used harsher wording too. I think I struck a good balance.
yamaha wrote: http://news.msn.com/us/2-dead-candidates-get-majority-of-votes-in-wash Thats pretty bad when deceased cantidates are still beating you.......
follow the money, or in this case, the power. i bet if you were to look deeper into it, if a dead person happens to get elected, someone somewhere gets to appoint their "replacement"
You'll need to log in to post.