As in the Hostess Twinkie. I have not had one in years and decided to live a little today. Yes it was as good as I remember but it seemed about 25% smaller.
As in the Hostess Twinkie. I have not had one in years and decided to live a little today. Yes it was as good as I remember but it seemed about 25% smaller.
Was it cold?
Gotta shake the package a little
It looks bigger in the dark.
Nope. Im not losing my hair either!!
Was it swimming
Well if yours has gotten smaller it's because if you don't use it you lose it.
Nah, blame it on the hole getting bigger.
It happens with age
carguy123 wrote: Well if yours has gotten smaller it's because if you don't use it you lose it.
Nope 4 kids. 
When you're young, you're just excited to have a Twinkie. When you get older, you have higher expectations and a lifetime of disappointments.
dean1484 wrote:carguy123 wrote: Well if yours has gotten smaller it's because if you don't use it you lose it.Nope 4 kids.
In that case see RX Reven's post above.
The PKE readings are lower, hence a smaller twinkie.
That's what she said.
It looks bigger if you trim back the packaging.
It kinda seems like you guys are talking about something else. Personally, I like ding dongs better than twinkies.
Ya and we have not even covered Ring Dings and Ho Hos.
I mean we are talking Hostess products here. 
Keith Tanner wrote: When you're young, you're just excited to have a Twinkie. When you get older, you have higher expectations and a lifetime of disappointments.
Are you referring to snowballs????
Ya this went off the rails fast.
And back on topic, not that we were ever off topic, 
They are smaller!!!!
dean1484 wrote: And back on topic, not that we were ever off topic,
Story says the vanilla twinkie is 35,8 grams each.
This box shows that the chocolate ones are 45.4 grams each.
So the chocolate twinkies are bigger?
You'll need to log in to post.
