The problem with that Caddy is with engines they put in them, fuel mileage isn't much better than the rig in the first post. Far worse when you consider the size/weight difference...
The problem with that Caddy is with engines they put in them, fuel mileage isn't much better than the rig in the first post. Far worse when you consider the size/weight difference...
yamaha wrote: In reply to Mitchell: I believe for emmisions sake, you still have to buy your drivetrain separately through roush....
To hypothetical daydreaming Mitchell, trivialities such as time, money, and difficulty are inconsequential.
Ian F wrote: The problem with that Caddy is with engines they put in them, fuel mileage isn't much better than the rig in the first post. Far worse when you consider the size/weight difference...![]()
What was the alternative?
Caddy 472 / 500 Olds 455 / 403
VS.....
You sure didn't want the GM diesel that was available.
You'll need to log in to post.