oldeskewltoy
oldeskewltoy Dork
1/15/14 11:09 a.m.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-14/verizon-wins-net-neutrality-court-ruling-against-fcc.html

http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2014/01/14/262454310/feds-cant-enforce-net-neutrality-what-this-means-for-you

Streetwiseguy
Streetwiseguy UberDork
1/15/14 11:10 a.m.

Or, if you want to pay more, you get better service...

turboswede
turboswede GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
1/15/14 11:10 a.m.

I've never liked Verizon. This just about takes the cake.

1988RedT2
1988RedT2 PowerDork
1/15/14 11:13 a.m.

Don't blame verizon, they're just a corporation, and greed is a given. Blame legislators and the courts.

Grtechguy
Grtechguy UltimaDork
1/15/14 11:19 a.m.

3rd party proxies

Kenny_McCormic
Kenny_McCormic UltraDork
1/15/14 11:26 a.m.

Thats an interesting monopolization technique.

GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
1/15/14 11:28 a.m.

Yeah too bad about the Internet...but the NSA and social media were ruining it anyway.

GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
1/15/14 11:29 a.m.
Streetwiseguy wrote: Or, if you want to pay more, you get better service...

How is that different from before?

madmallard
madmallard HalfDork
1/15/14 11:35 a.m.

verizon just sued to have the law followed. and the law says the FCC doesnt have the same purview over internet service providers.

petition the law to be changed if you dont like it...

yamaha
yamaha PowerDork
1/15/14 11:43 a.m.

In reply to madmallard:

Pretty much, basically it seemed as though the court just told the FCC, you can do it, just not the way you tried to.....try again.

Streetwiseguy
Streetwiseguy UberDork
1/15/14 4:50 p.m.
GameboyRMH wrote:
Streetwiseguy wrote: Or, if you want to pay more, you get better service...
How is that different from before?

Well, yeah. The only complaints I've heard about the whole deal is from the sort of people who think everyone should have unlimited access to all the internet for free, so I've never really managed to figure out exactly what the big deal is for the everyday kind of person. If somebody would like to edumacate me about how its not just a right wing conspiracy to prevent the future of the progressive movement blah blah blah I'd be happy to hear from you.

Kenny_McCormic
Kenny_McCormic UltraDork
1/15/14 5:00 p.m.

In reply to Streetwiseguy:

Used to be it was you bought so much service and used it however you pleased.

Now there is nothing stopping an ISP from saying "Oh we don't deal with netflix traffic anymore unless you pay the netflix fee"(then they introduce a competing streaming video service of their own). Or "Your ping times are now throttled to 1000ms without the gaming package" etc.

You also don't typically have a choice in internet provider, making this even more of a problem.

Cone_Junkie
Cone_Junkie SuperDork
1/15/14 5:05 p.m.

It's either that or regulate the internet. I'm pretty sure most people on here LOVE gov't regulation in any form

MCarp22
MCarp22 HalfDork
1/15/14 5:20 p.m.

Derick Freese
Derick Freese UltraDork
1/15/14 5:33 p.m.

I can see the internet 2.0 being created by hackers using WiFi to connect everyone. All equipment will be solar powered. Since it operates in the ungoverned space in the 2.4 ghz range, you can pretty much do what you want, until you're creating interference with other devices.

Kenny_McCormic
Kenny_McCormic UltraDork
1/15/14 6:13 p.m.

In reply to MCarp22:

Precisely.

Toyman01
Toyman01 GRM+ Memberand UltimaDork
1/15/14 6:34 p.m.

So, the FCC doesn't want the internet providers to do what the cable providers have been doing since the beginning of cable?

Sounds like someone has better lobbyist.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
azdVeTJ9pvkCyVpmJtty8hghJrpHLT11CKjSQia6jl4JdPXhw5CYOxqH90229jCD