Jerry wrote:
JoeyM wrote:
Jerry wrote:
I found Jalopnik recently, scan the headlines for interesting stuff. What do you recommend?
.....not reading jalopnik!!!!
Really? Seems like they have some interesting stuff from time to time. Am I missing something?
We've already beaten the "why jalopnik sucks" topic to death multiple times, but here (again) are my thoughts on the subject.
Jalopnik is WAY too TMZ/tabloid for my taste. If you really need to read some non-GRM site, you can get the same stuff as jalopnik by reading Hooniverse, or left lane news, or the truth about cars.....the big difference is that they won't tell you about Lindsey Lohan's latest car crash and jalopnik will.
I used to read Jalopnik, back when Sam Smith and Murilee Martin wrote there.
They're gone....and so am I. Here's the simple fact of the matter; Gawker cares about one statistic, unique page views. They have admitted this. (Hell, they take pride in it.) They don't give a damned about their core audience, or about their writers.
For fun, try reading the 2010 Awesomeness Manifesto where Ray Wert talked about how the site had started to suck, but he would fix it, and how bring Sam Smith in was a key part of that.....less than a year later, Wert was announcing that Smith was out[*], Murilee Martin was out, and that the site would NOW suck less.
Guess what? The site sucks harder now than ever (no surprise since the best writers are gone.) I haven't paid attention in a few years, but I would not be surprised if there had been a half dozen more "jalopnik will get better, I promise" posts from Wert since I left. It won't; the content doesn't matter to Gawker, and they are happy since page views are up.
Then there is Gawker's dumbass method of handling user data. How hard is it to understand that you should not store user passwords in plaintext? You should store a salted hash of the password, preferably using a lossy method to generate it. (Hell, the *nix community figured that out back in the 1970s, and they still suffered from dictionary attacks.)
[*] -
(This is despite the fact that Sam wrote some amazing stories for them (seriously, he's the next Peter Egan). Sam had a few stories with off-the-chart views, but that wasn't true consistently. I suspect this is why he had to leave for "less structured freelance gigs")