ignorant wrote:wcelliot wrote: The main difference is that capitalists detest both while leftists only detest fascism.this leftist detests both. Once again you're caught projecting opinion as fact. I only post this to educate you and as the winner of the argument you previous forfeited, I feel it is my duty to do such.
So leftists detest themselves? Fascinating...
ignorant wrote:ddavidv wrote:its so awesome missleading people. Or is it the ability for me to see through all their horrid half truths and you're blinded by bill o'reilly's awesome hair.ignorant wrote: Now. this goes back to my other assertion that you are NOT stating facts, but merely opinions. But since they are veiled in facts or semi-truths most people like to believe them, sorta like Fox News.Thank you for the Fox News reference. This nicely illustrates how narrow-minded you really are.
If you're only getting your news from one source, it's going to be biased. However, the anti-Fox News mantra doesn't fly unless you are a committed lefty blindly following the propaganda. Fox has the highest ratings, which means (do I really need to explain this?) more people watch it. People tend to only 'purchase' products they believe in. So, the majority of people believe Fox is offering up superior news coverage.
Since the Bill Maher leftists believe anyone who doesn't agree with them is an idiot, I can see how your Fox News bias is created. Thus, my observation of narrow-mindedness makes sense.
Tim Baxter wrote: I love how people equate capitalism with both christianity and democracy, without understanding why it is inherently at odds with both. Capitalism is Darwinistic. It does not say all men are created equal, it believes those with capital have an obligation to crush those with less. It does not say love your fellow man, it says beat him. Beat him bad. There are winners and losers, which one do you want to be. Now don't get me wrong, I love capitalism. It beats the hell out of every other economic system that's been tried, and it's the only one that really accounts for human avarice, laziness, and ambition. It understands what we are, rather than what we might aspire to be. And it works. But it's not a christian or a democratic philosophy at its core, and I think one of the reasons we might be in the mess we're in is because we've muddied all three of those things. Render unto God that which is God's and unto Caesar that which is Caesar, ya know.
Capitalism and Christianity aren't mutually exclusive. One thing to consider is Christians don't "own" anything. All that they have is held in trust from God. They are simply stewards during their time on earth.
Here is an excerpt from an pretty good article on Christianity and Capitalism.
"Is capitalism Christian? No. It neither advances existing human virtues nor corrects ingrained personal vices; it merely reflects them. But socialism is less consistent with several Biblical tenets for it exacerbates the worst of men’s flaws. By divorcing effort from reward, stirring up covetousness and envy, and destroying the freedom that is a necessary precondition for virtue, it tears at the just social fabric that Christians should seek to establish. A Christian must still work hard to shed even a little of God’s light in a capitalist society. But his task is likely to be much harder in a collectivist system."
The entire article is here.
ddavidv wrote: So, the majority of people believe Fox is offering up superior news coverage.
funny that those on the right also believe that the average american is and I quote "Sheeple" and you just effectively said the average american watches Fox... So the folks on the right are the people they detest?
wcelliot wrote:ignorant wrote:So leftists detest themselves? Fascinating...wcelliot wrote: The main difference is that capitalists detest both while leftists only detest fascism.this leftist detests both. Once again you're caught projecting opinion as fact. I only post this to educate you and as the winner of the argument you previous forfeited, I feel it is my duty to do such.
nope... I think this just goes to show you the nice little buckets you want to place everyone in to make sure that the world is black and white and your arguments work, are not accurate. I'll also argue that I'm more of a capitalist than you once again. But I won't go on to prove it because this discussion doesn't need proof just conjecture.
Toyman01 wrote: Capitalism and Christianity aren't mutually exclusive.
This guy
and
would not disagree with you..
You ever seen creflo dollar's house..
Trust Iggy to go to the extremes.
By your logic, this guy makes you a socialist.
After all, the worst of a group of people defines the group. At least that's what you seem to think.
Yes I know you stir the pot just for the sake of stirring.
Edited to fix the image link.
Toyman01 wrote: After all, the worst of a group of people defines the group. At least that's what you seem to think.
now this is an interesting thought. I'd actually say that yes, the worst of the lot can define the lot. One of the things that I am becoming acutely aware of as I get older is that perception is reality in all groups and in all forms.
Look at our discussions about toyota, it's actual quality, GM, it's actual quality, perceived brand value, perceived brand quality and how old sins seem to die hard.
Marketing, advertising, sales, public relations, and politics are, in pragmatic practice, more about guiding your message than the actual message. I'm interested in doing a stint in marketing job soon.
The worst of any group is generally the one the opposition singles out to use to tar all of them with the same brush. It's some more of that marketing crap which all comes down to spouting bullE36 M3 to achieve a desired result. Me, I don't think I could sleep well knowing I was a purveyor of bullE36 M3.
About capitalism vs. socialism:
Capitalism is where one is paid (that's called 'profit') for performing a service or providing for a need or want. While it can certainly be abused by the worst practicioners, it does more to bring out the hard worker in people. Of course it's based in self interest, after all self preservation is one of the strongest of human instinct urges.
Some will be better at capitalism than others. That's merely a reflection of society as a whole; black, white and all sorts of shades of gray in between.
OTOH, socialism (which is what the worst of the left espouses as a lofty ideal) is designed to make all equal, i.e. everyone is the same shade of gray. While this appears to be a lofty ideal at first glance, in reality it crushes the best of the human spirit by removing opportunity.
So which one would I rather live with? Give me the opportunity to better myself. If I blow it, it's no one's fault but mine.
ignorant wrote:Toyman01 wrote: After all, the worst of a group of people defines the group. At least that's what you seem to think.now this is an interesting thought. I'd actually say that yes, the worst of the lot can define the lot. One of the things that I am becoming acutely aware of as I get older is that perception is reality in all groups and in all forms. Look at our discussions about toyota, it's actual quality, GM, it's actual quality, perceived brand value, perceived brand quality and how old sins seem to die hard. Marketing, advertising, sales, public relations, and politics are, in pragmatic practice, more about guiding your message than the actual message. I'm interested in doing a stint in marketing job soon.
You think there might be a slight difference between cars made by a manufacturer and people who, just in case you haven't noticed, aren't all made in the same way.
Toyman01 wrote:ignorant wrote:You think there might be a slight difference between cars made by a manufacturer and people who, just in case you haven't noticed, aren't all made in the same way.Toyman01 wrote: After all, the worst of a group of people defines the group. At least that's what you seem to think.now this is an interesting thought. I'd actually say that yes, the worst of the lot can define the lot. One of the things that I am becoming acutely aware of as I get older is that perception is reality in all groups and in all forms. Look at our discussions about toyota, it's actual quality, GM, it's actual quality, perceived brand value, perceived brand quality and how old sins seem to die hard. Marketing, advertising, sales, public relations, and politics are, in pragmatic practice, more about guiding your message than the actual message. I'm interested in doing a stint in marketing job soon.
Sorry, I don't understand where you are going with that...
You'll need to log in to post.
