Taking your ball and going home...

Now to get this clear, does the lack of balls in a Lesbian Relationship make these fine people the new minority or the new underprivileged?

aussiesmg wrote: Now to get this clear, does the lack of balls in a Lesbian Relationship make these fine people the new minority or the new underprivileged?

They get balls whether they want them or not. It is part of my ball distribution program.

What about the over abundance of balls in a gay relationship? Does one of them have to relinquish their balls to continue the relationship?

This thread is:

Bobzilla wrote: What about the over abundance of balls in a gay relationship? Does one of them have to relinquish their balls to continue the relationship?

That's a very good point. Don't gay couples have a disproportionate number of balls? Shouldn't those get re-distributed to be fair to those who aren't as fortunate?

Bobzilla wrote: What about the over abundance of balls in a gay relationship? Does one of them have to relinquish their balls to continue the relationship?

Just because that couple is lucky enough to have been blessed with an over-abundance of balls doesn't mean that other couples should not have an opportunity to also have balls. I think if you spread the balls around it's good for everybody.

In reply to Datsun1500:

I think that's wrong. California has too many balls already.

Are we still playing with our balls in here?

People don't really need two balls. If Lance Armstrong can do what he did with only one ball, anyone can.

Well, statistically speaking, the average person has one ball.

In reply to Beer Baron:

People can cheat with no balls what-so-ever, so that Lance did it with one isn't all that surprising.

In reply to T.J.:

Especially with the juice.

Well, I for one think they need more stringent testing procedures...he cant have his ball back till he makes restitution to all those who were denied balls while he on the sauce, winning all the balls.

4cylndrfury wrote: Well, I for one think they need more stringent testing procedures...he cant have his ball back till he makes restitution to all those who were denied balls while he on the sauce, winning all the balls.

His ball was in the same sauce all the other riders' balls were in. That said, any sauce on those balls is too much.

Its only a matter of time before George Takei finds this thread now.........

Datsun1500 wrote: In reply to poopshovel: I'm betting they're not gonna shut it down. I bet it brings more people to the magazine at this point. It's also really, really, tame as far as boards go

Errrr....I wouldn't bet that way. During the last website update, "Latest Topics" disappeared from the front page. You can be sure that some of the topics and threat titles we have going on will keep us from going back to the front.

We're tolerated, not beloved. Don't confuse the two.

Suddenly I have a craving for meat balls...And maybe some Marinara sauce.

T.J. wrote: In reply to Beer Baron: People can cheat with no balls what-so-ever, so that Lance did it with one isn't all that surprising.

So now you're saying that people without enough balls are all cheats and druggies. This is just people with more balls looking down on those without.

Eight pages and no mention of Schweddy balls.

In reply to spitfirebill:

thats because for most of us its currently shrunken balls due to the cold.

Nor any mention of chocolate salty balls.

I do not find these styles of balls to be nearly as enlightening as the political balls, no matter how frustrating those balls may be.

You know who else only had one ball? Hitler!!!

Beer Baron wrote: You know who else only had one ball?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6yDhVyP9oU