Woody
Woody GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
12/24/11 5:08 a.m.

Saturday, December 24, 2011 3:10 AM EST

How Rudolph went down in history

By HOLLY RAMER Associated Press HANOVER, N.H. — You know Dasher and Dancer and the rest of the gang. But do you recall, the most "Perfect Christmas Crowd-Bringer" of all?

That's how executives at Montgomery Ward originally described Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, who first appeared in a 1939 book written by one of the company's advertising copywriters and given free to children as a way to drive traffic to the stores.

Curious to know more about how Rudolph really went down in history? It's all in the pages of a long-overlooked scrapbook compiled by the story's author, Robert L. May, and housed at his alma mater, Dartmouth College.

May donated his handwritten first draft and illustrated mock-up to Dartmouth before his death at age 71 in 1976, and his family later added to what has become a large collection of Rudolph-related documents and merchandise, including a life-sized papier-mache reindeer that now stands among the stacks at the Rauner Special Collections Library. But May's scrapbook about the book's launch and success went unnoticed until last year, when Dartmouth archivist Peter Carini came across it while looking for something else.

"No one on staff currently knew we had it. I pulled it out and all the pieces started falling out. It was just a mess," Carini said.

The scrapbook, which has since been restored and catalogued, includes May's list of possible names for his story's title character — from Rodney and Rollo to Reginald and Romeo. There's a map showing how many books went to each state and letters of praise from adults and children alike.

The scrapbook also chronicles the massive marketing campaign Montgomery Ward launched to drum up newspaper coverage of the book giveaway and its efforts to promote it within the company.

Near the front of the scrapbook is a large colored poster instructing Montgomery Ward stores about how to order and distribute the book. An illustration of Rudolph sweeps across the page, his name written in ornate script. There are exclamation points galore. "The rollinckingest, rip-roaringest, riot-provokingest, Christmas give-away your town has ever seen!" "A laugh and a thrill for every boy and girl in your town (and for their parents, too!)"

Rudolph is described as "the perfect Christmas crowd-bringer," if stores follow a few rules, including giving the book only to children accompanied by adults. "This will limit `street urchin' traffic to a minimum, and will bring in the PARENTS ... the people you want to sell!"

The response was overwhelming — at a time when a print-run of 50,000 books was considered a best-seller, the company gave away more than 2 million copies that first year and by the following year was selling an assortment of Rudolph-themed toys and other items.

But lest this become a story about corporate greed, it should be noted that in 1947, Montgomery Ward took the unusual step of turning over the copyright to the book to May, who was struggling financially after the death of his first wife.

"He then made several million dollars using that in various ways, through the movie, the song, merchandising and things like that," Carini said. "I think it's a great story because it shows how corporations used to think of themselves as part of civil society and how much that has changed."

May eventually left Montgomery Ward to essentially manage Rudolph's career, which really took off after May's brother-in-law Johnny Marks wrote the song (made famous by Gene Autry in 1949), and the release of a stop-motion animated television special in 1964.

Both the song and movie depart significantly from May's original plot, however. In May's story, Rudolph doesn't live at the North Pole or grow up aspiring to pull Santa's sleigh — he lives in a reindeer village and Santa discovers him while filling Rudolph's stocking on a foggy Christmas Eve.

"And you," Santa tells Rudolph, "May yet save the day! Your wonderful forehead may yet pave the way!"'

May's story is written in verse, similar to "The Night Before Christmas" by Clement Clarke Moore, and opens, "'Twas the day before Christmas and all through the hills/ The reindeer were playing ... enjoying the spills."

"It's lovely to hear it read out loud, it really comes alive," Virginia Herz, one of May's daughters, said in a phone interview this week.

As a small child, Herz, who declined to reveal her age, didn't think there was anything unusual about growing up in a house surrounded by Rudolph merchandise. It wasn't until she was older that she realized her father's job of "taking care of Rudolph" was a bit different. She tells her grandchildren that their great-grandpa wrote a story about Rudolph, not that he created the character.

"As I child, that's how I felt. I knew my dad had written a wonderful book about Rudolph and now there were Rudolph toys and other things all around us," she said. "But it was no different than the guy next door who sold cars, or the guy down the street who was a painting contractor."

She acknowledges the myths that have become entwined in Rudolph's history — including the notion that May wrote the story as a Christmas gift for his older daughter, Barbara, when his wife was dying of cancer and that a Montgomery Ward manager "caught wind of the little storybook." In reality, Montgomery Ward assigned May to write a Christmas book around the same time his wife was ill, Herz said.

""What's out there on the Internet is a softer telling," she said. "My dad was aware of it and considered it appropriate. There's the softer, romantic version and the more fact-based version."

Herz said her father would be thrilled to see how his creation and its many incarnations have become part of American culture.

"I think he would be startlingly amazed," she said. "It really is an eternal part of Christmas. He would have been amazed."

carguy123
carguy123 SuperDork
12/24/11 9:06 a.m.

Where's the link to this, I want to pass it around.

Woody
Woody GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
12/24/11 9:25 a.m.

Sorry. Here's the link:

http://www.rep-am.com/articles/2011/12/24/news/national/608303.txt

DrBoost
DrBoost SuperDork
12/24/11 11:21 a.m.

"The Real Story of Christmas: Corporate Marketing Machine"

There, fixed the thread title for you.

jrw1621
jrw1621 SuperDork
12/24/11 12:12 p.m.

Interesting, thanks for sharing.
This link leads to another copy of the story but with pictures.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iOXIE9l3-QNoPQEHozQ3SrsRTMWw?docId=3273b486f92d42ca9b40cf374e615cce

SyntheticBlinkerFluid
SyntheticBlinkerFluid Dork
12/24/11 12:32 p.m.

Ahh another great piece of Chicago History.

mtn
mtn SuperDork
12/24/11 1:26 p.m.
DrBoost wrote: "The Real Story of Christmas: Corporate Marketing Machine" There, fixed the thread title for you.

Nope, sorry. I've got a nativity up in my front yard, am going to church soon, and will be with the extended family that I haven't seen in months after that. THAT is the real story of Christmas.

novaderrik
novaderrik Dork
12/24/11 1:44 p.m.
mtn wrote:
DrBoost wrote: "The Real Story of Christmas: Corporate Marketing Machine" There, fixed the thread title for you.
Nope, sorry. I've got a nativity up in my front yard, am going to church soon, and will be with the extended family that I haven't seen in months after that. THAT is the real story of Christmas.

he was talking about the modern commercialized secular version of Christmas that most people observe and not the celebration of the birth of a religious figure..

DrBoost
DrBoost SuperDork
12/24/11 3:40 p.m.
novaderrik wrote:
mtn wrote:
DrBoost wrote: "The Real Story of Christmas: Corporate Marketing Machine" There, fixed the thread title for you.
Nope, sorry. I've got a nativity up in my front yard, am going to church soon, and will be with the extended family that I haven't seen in months after that. THAT is the real story of Christmas.
he was talking about the modern commercialized secular version of Christmas that most people observe and not the celebration of the birth of a religious figure..

That and the false basis for the holiday. It's base doctrine is false and the modern interpretation is way off even from the supposed basis for the celebration.
Sorry folks. I get so freaking fed up with christmas that by the time the 23rd rolls around I'm done pretending. When the marketing machine starts firing up holiday songs after holloween, it's a bit much to handle.

JThw8
JThw8 SuperDork
12/24/11 6:03 p.m.
mtn wrote:
DrBoost wrote: "The Real Story of Christmas: Corporate Marketing Machine" There, fixed the thread title for you.
Nope, sorry. I've got a nativity up in my front yard, am going to church soon, and will be with the extended family that I haven't seen in months after that. THAT is the real story of Christmas.

While I appreciate the sentiment let's not forget tomorrow, calender wise, has feck all to do with Jesus and is merely a pagan holiday adopted by the church.

carguy123
carguy123 SuperDork
12/24/11 6:06 p.m.
While I appreciate the sentiment let's not forget tomorrow, calender wise, has feck all to do with Jesus and is merely a pagan holiday adopted by the church.

Actually that's not right at all. They happened to pick a day that was also a pagan holiday to celebrate Jesus's birth, but that has nothing to do with the actual celebration. You could do it on gay pride day and the celebration would be the same. They day itself doesn't matter all that much since there is no way to pinpoint the actual day.

Astronomers tell us it was probably in March, but so what.

JThw8
JThw8 SuperDork
12/24/11 6:40 p.m.
carguy123 wrote:
While I appreciate the sentiment let's not forget tomorrow, calender wise, has feck all to do with Jesus and is merely a pagan holiday adopted by the church.
Actually that's not right at all. They happened to pick a day that was also a pagan holiday to celebrate Jesus's birth, but that has nothing to do with the actual celebration. You could do it on gay pride day and the celebration would be the same. They day itself doesn't matter all that much since there is no way to pinpoint the actual day. Astronomers tell us it was probably in March, but so what.

Being as it is Christmas time I won't engage in a battle over it, just saying it was a pagan holiday first and the only "magic" it contains is what we make of it.

DrBoost
DrBoost SuperDork
12/24/11 7:17 p.m.

I've read before (can't remember where exactly) that the catholic church moved christmas to the 25th in an effort to get pegan followers on board. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em as they say!
Yeah, I won't even try to discuss the facts behind the holiday, doctrine, rituals and so on. It really doesn't take much to figure things out.

carguy123
carguy123 SuperDork
12/24/11 7:26 p.m.

Just about every church holiday was already a festival day.

mtn
mtn SuperDork
12/25/11 12:37 a.m.
DrBoost wrote:
novaderrik wrote:
mtn wrote:
DrBoost wrote: "The Real Story of Christmas: Corporate Marketing Machine" There, fixed the thread title for you.
Nope, sorry. I've got a nativity up in my front yard, am going to church soon, and will be with the extended family that I haven't seen in months after that. THAT is the real story of Christmas.
he was talking about the modern commercialized secular version of Christmas that most people observe and not the celebration of the birth of a religious figure..
That and the false basis for the holiday. It's base doctrine is false and the modern interpretation is way off even from the supposed basis for the celebration.

EDIT:

I deleted what I posted. Those of you who want to try and destroy/destruct/stop the joy that Christmas creates--whatever its roots and whatever it stands for--go ahead. I think that everyone knows from my previous post where I stand; it should say more than enough about the subject.

Merry Christmas too all, and to all a good night

MG Bryan
MG Bryan HalfDork
12/25/11 12:59 a.m.

Christmas celebrations weren't connected to pagan traditions until the 12th century despite the fact that December 25th was celebrated by Christians as early as the 4thgreatest century.

Happy Christmas and God bless.

DrBoost
DrBoost SuperDork
12/25/11 10:43 a.m.

Did Jesus celebrate his birthday? What were the outcomes of the only two times a birthday was mentioned in the bible? WWJD?
I'm not trying to destroy the fake fabric, just really have a hard time swallowing the crap after a few months of it. Like mtn, I'm not saying A LOT. The idea of christmas (in some ways) is fine, like being thankful for what you have (yet the whole basis of the celebration is getting more???). If that's the case, can any one here really say that's even remotely what it's about?
If christmas creates joy, then good for you. I create joy the other 364 days of the year by being with my family, being grateful for my wife and kids (no need to lie to them, imagine that!), and giving thanks for the fact that I'm employed, able to support my family, my health and many things.
When folks say "merry christmas" and the like I think them. It's a genuine thanks as well because they are wishing me well. What get's me is the commercialism that the holiday is and the fact that the vast majority of the followers have no idea what's behind it all.
Now Festivus, that's a celebration I can get behind! Anything that recycles a coat tree and involves wrestling your dad to the ground is all win in my book.

Again, not knocking anyone for their personal beliefs, here or anywhere else. Just tired of the songs and commercials and venting.

carguy123
carguy123 SuperDork
12/25/11 12:16 p.m.

The worse the economy the more they have to hype it. For many companies it is their year. The rest of the year pays the salaries and the over head and the profit is now.

So tell me again why the worker should make all the money and the owners are just scum sucking slime. THEY take all the risks and may not make a profit many years.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
JLrzqwVEckswQ2GY8gjmeKeNjlPsoNQfKIjqZVtI5OFdKQnkHW0lWkYi6ZqBd246