Just for eye candy....
Just for eye candy....
Total loss, collision damage in 03/2015 with 35k miles
Next entry is new owner 01/2019 with the same miles
Edited to remove screenshot.
Well that speaks volumes and simultaneously doesn't answer a lot of questions.
Could be a complete new front clip, or just hit a deer given the costs of Jag repair.
Thank you SO MUCH for the hookup.
Curtis73 (Forum Supporter) said:Well that speaks volumes and simultaneously doesn't answer a lot of questions.
That was my exact thought. If you don't need the shots anymore, I should delete them in case someone's looking (or delete the thread, whatever)
In reply to Curtis73 (Forum Supporter) :
I think but I'm not sure that insurance companies have more access to what damage it had. Might be worth PMing some of the members in that industry.
Never purchase a vehicle where the photos in the advertisement were taken at night
Delete at will. Thank you.
In reply to Captdownshift (Forum Supporter) :
There were a bunch taken in the daylight, too. Not good detail, but they show a car. Nothing you can really tell from an internet photo anyway.
Crap shoot. If it were local I'd already be looking at it.
Sorry, was offline most of the weekend. If you want eyes on it I can go see it.
If you know what damage it had I can look extra sharply at those bits.
Love the tire marks on the rear seat.
Duke said:Sorry, was offline most of the weekend. If you want eyes on it I can go see it.
If you know what damage it had I can look extra sharply at those bits.
Seller has weird communication which gives me red flags. It was a "total loss, front collision." I looked through news reports around the time of the police report but didn't find any dead jaguars in pictures.
I think I'll pass. His communication makes me feel "too good to be true" applies here.
Sorry it doesn't seem right. Let me know if something else pops up in the DE area.
You'll need to log in to post.
