Despite what others say - THESE ARE NOT A REPLACEMENT FOR A REAL COMPUTER.
Yes, they have a lot of the functionality of one, but they cannot do it all, and actually REQUIRE a real computer (Mac, PC,Linux, etc) to even just be turned on, let alone perform anything more than basic, cursory functions (like, oh, I dunno, move any file besides a picture...)
Theyre great for entertainment, and the always on feature is nice if you quickly need to look up directions or find something online.
Our original iPad is so out of date (2 years and some change later?!? wtf? thanks Steve "berktard" Jobs) that half of the apps for it dont work anymore, as the IOS is out of date. Want to upgrade the IOS for the original iPad? Gotta have a separate computer (which we dont, thats what the Ipad was supposedly for), and the upgrade WILL wipe the entire memory, so better back it up...equals: Hassle
Ours was free (award), so thats great, but I wouldnt pay money for one. Apple is convinced they can construct a framework for your digital life, and no part of their offering can function on its own outside of that framework. Theyre designing all their equipment to work together, but it leaves no room for outside products, or (especially in the case of the pad) for the user to have only parts of the fruit lineup.
I think tablets are certainly the future, but the next one we buy will likely be a Microsoft Surface (both of us are MS Office nerds - Excel, Access, Word, Outlook, Powerpoint etc etc)...open source dummy versions of those just dont cut it for us. Apple is father down the list of tech that I want to buy than Commodore at this point.