Thanks. Those are similar to what I was looking at.
+1 for the Forceum MT 08 in 13". I get a slight rub on the front right going over bumps with stock suspension, but generally a good fit.
Has anyone calculated their real world mpg on these? I wonder if one would make sense for my 3 mile drive to work.
I have not calculated mileage yet. I don't drive it a ton. I've heard other people comment numbers 30-50mpg. I think a lot depends on the vehicles condition maintenance wise and speed driven. You said 3 mile commute so likely you'd be getting on the higher side of that.
AAZCD-Jon (Forum Supporter) said:+1 for the Forceum MT 08 in 13". I get a slight rub on the front right going over bumps with stock suspension, but generally a good fit.
Did you upgrade your springs? That is first on my list.
lownslow said:AAZCD-Jon (Forum Supporter) said:+1 for the Forceum MT 08 in 13". I get a slight rub on the front right going over bumps with stock suspension, ...
Did you upgrade your springs? That is first on my list.
Not upgraded yet, but I plan to after ...other project cars. For now, having some weight in the back to balance it is enough to keep it from rubbing in the front.
In reply to AAZCD-Jon (Forum Supporter) :
Do you mind sharing the type of wheel this is? I'm trying to find some Civic VX wheels but having no luck and I like the look of these.
Just sniped these on Facebook from someone that didn't follow through on buying them. 12" wheels with some older snows.
I like that the truck is a little better running than the 13" Forceum. Since I only have a 4 speed since mine is an Attack. A normal 5 speed RWD or AWD would run the Forceum better.
It's got me really thinking about what to do with my truck. I might sell both sets of wheels and just run stock steelies. Or the Forceum might go back on for a couple months of the winter fun.
I have a "dream" for it but with my Boxster and Touareg truck projects ahead I don't know if I want to start another right now.
Saw this through a Facebook group.
I like the truck for the utility. A lot of the engine swaps either cut holes in the bed or eliminate it completely and make it rear wheel drive only.
What I'm thinking of is finding a basic Honda 4 cylinder and lifting or spacing the suspension in a way it can fit without cutting / poking through the bed. Kinda narrowed down to a K24a1 which was in 2002-2009 CR-V. Non-VTEC and about 150hp. With everything sitting higher I could go a good deal bigger on tires which would also increase top speed. And hoping it would just stay reliable enough with mostly stock rest of the drivetrain.
Previa is longitudinal, ACTY is transverse. Plus I'd want to use a Honda engine to keep it in the family.
Previa:
In just a few months, the 2000 model year variants will start to become eligible for import.
I'm still debating one of these. I was convinced I had to have a 4WD model, but for the uses I have planned (around the yard and around town) a 2WD model is probably fine. A 2WD model will make it easier to do an engine swap, too. It's likely I'll choose between the Acty and the Sambar.
With Honda they had a split year and some of the 1999 were the new style HA6 (2wd), HA7 (awd) so there are already ones here. I've watched a couple videos and they seem to be a night and day difference to the earlier versions.
I thought about buying a hay bale to recreate this
A little googling and a round bale that size should be about 650-800 pounds and cost between $100-150. The Honda's rating is 350kg (770 freedom units).
You'll need to log in to post.