Has SCCA road racing gotten too rough? And, if so, who or what are to blame?

David S.
By David S. Wallens
May 2, 2022 | SCCA, road racing

Has SCCA road racing gotten too physical and, if so, how do we put the genie back into the bottle?

Eric Prill, the SCCA’s vice president of road racing and also a national champion, shared the following letter to his fellow racers.

Dear SCCA Hoosier Super Tour Drivers,

I write to you today, not solely as the staff lead of the SCCA Road Racing program, but as a fellow driver.

Friends, we need to talk…

Over the last couple of years, staff has heard concerns from many of you about the level of driving, the number of incidents and the amount of discipline at our events—specifically the Hoosier Super Tour weekends.

Speaking to several of you over the last season, there is a belief that the driving quality has degraded, and the number of incidents increased over the last couple of years. Aside from the number of actions during a weekend, which has not shown a meaningful change outside of the Runoffs, we have not had a mechanism to specifically track the on-track activity.

So, following this year’s VIR Super Tour (April 8-10), we combed through the T&S data and Communication logs and complied that information.

Some specific data from VIR:

Number of participants: 409

Number of sessions: 40

Number of sessions that were interrupted (FCY, BFA, Early Checker): 22

Number of sessions that went un-interrupted, Green-to-Checker: 18

Total incidents* reported on race logs (from corner station calls): 212

Spins: 92

Total Cars involved in metal-metal: 65

Number of vehicles requiring a tow of some kind: 57

Individual cars involved in incidents that stopped a session: 50

Laps not completed on Sunday due to reaching 35-min. time limit: 25 out of 112 possible (22%)

*Spins, metal-metal, barrier impact, stopped/mechanical – anything that either stopped a session or could have potentially stopped a session. Did not include calls of four-wheels off not involving a spin. The number should actually be higher than 212, but some of the hand-written notes were difficult to decipher.

This information gives us a baseline, something that we can track and compare future events to. As I looked through the logs, it also became clear that they don’t include every single thing that happened on track. For instance, one (metal-to-metal) incident that prompted a protest was not mentioned in the session log.

This is a great reminder that, as outstanding as our corner marshals are, it is impossible for them to see everything that happens from their posts, particularly when they’re reporting on the 212+ other incidents throughout the weekend. So, if there’s no report, and the drivers don’t say anything, there is no record and no opportunity for investigation.

Without previous data for comparison, we don’t know if any of these numbers are better or worse than previous events. For the sake of this argument, let’s assume they are worse.

Why is this happening, and why does it seem to have happened over the last couple of years? Here are a few considerations that have been relayed to staff recently by the racers themselves:

COVID forced all of us to take time off from doing the things we loved. Now that many of us have returned to racing, there may be some rust, pent-up aggression and feelings that we all need to “seize the day” every chance we get.

Whether it is politics, inflation, personal loss, or the overall state of the world, many people are kind of ticked-off in general. And some are taking that frustration to the racetrack.

Yellows breed yellows. When you don’t have faith in your group making a lot of green laps, there is a sense of desperation. Desperate driving creates more incidents.

Send it. A popular rally cry for some, but generally not a solid strategy, particularly in amateur motorsports. See also, “disposable racecars.”

Too much, too soon? It’s outstanding that we have lots of new drivers coming into the program. The Hoosier SCCA Super Tour is designed to be the “big stage” and there are a lot of racers that take racing very seriously.

For a new driver, that can be daunting. When you add a daunting racetrack to that situation, it can be downright intimidating. There is neither shame in asking for help nor recognizing that you may need to take a step back from the big stage. In fact, many would consider it admirable.

There are many other reasons for sure, these are just a sample that we’ve heard over the last couple of seasons.

What is SCCA going to do to fix this?”

This is something that I, and others, have been asked multiple times recently. From “hurry up the safety teams,” “harsher penalties,” “different run groups,” to “tiered licensing processes,” there is no shortage of ideas for program leaders, race organizers and officials to consider.

Ultimately, there are many things that can influence change here. And that all starts with us, the drivers. It starts with getting through Turn One. And then Turn Two, and all the way through Lap One, and so forth.

It is acknowledgement by us, the driving community, that 57 tows over a three-day weekend is unacceptable.

It is a commitment by the driving community to protect our sessions, and strive to go Green-to-Checker without interruption.

It is a pledge to be the driver that you want everyone else to be.

I know the staff team, program leaders and officials will endeavor to seek out ways to improve the experience during our events.

I ask that we, the driving community, do our part to start this Green-to-Checker (G2C) movement.

See you at the track,

Eric Prill

VP, SCCA Road Racing & Driver

(who has made his fair share of mistakes behind the wheel over the last 30 years, but always strives to be better)

Join Free Join our community to easily find more SCCA and road racing news.
Comments
Captdownshift (Forum Supporter)
Captdownshift (Forum Supporter) GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
5/2/22 11:48 a.m.

It's a difficult balance from a sanctioning body standpoint. Graduated licenses would be great, but some potential competitors would view it was a money grab or requirement to run a minimum number of events a year in order to be able to move up. And a system for tiers would need to be established and class sizes would shrink. 13s would work with consistency of implementation. You also have consider how other sanctioning bodies are going to counter punch whatever you do in an effort to recruit drivers. There are more options than ever with regards to with whom to run with. It's a complicated matter to address, but one that does need evaluation, then addressing with confidence. 

David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
5/2/22 11:57 a.m.

I know that rubbin's racing, but to quote Randy Pobst, Crashing sucks. 

(Editor's note: "Rubbin's racing" is sarcasm.)

BA5
BA5 GRM+ Memberand Reader
5/2/22 12:29 p.m.

I stay out of wheel-to-wheel because I've long gotten a bad vibe from the crowd.

Although in all competitions there's always a few folks who seem to forget that we're all just out there to have fun.

johndej
johndej Dork
5/2/22 12:44 p.m.

Sounds like they're going the right direction by keeping actual numbers from events. Perhaps put in some sort of points system for being involved in a certain number of incidents per events (not per year as I imagine someone could just take a few races off to reset) and penalize appropriately. Everyone has a camera now so shouldn't be hard to verify.

Tom1200
Tom1200 UltraDork
5/2/22 12:47 p.m.

Some things to ponder:

How is it  vintage races manage to have far fewer incidents?

[Before anyone chimes in about high speed parading I would suggest you've never vintage raced. Egos & the desire to win abound there as well. Pretty sure Tim isn't building a Mustang to parade around].

Years a go a dear friend asked me how come men act like pigs, to which I answered "because you let them".

Every time a group gets out of hand it's because we let them.

Think I'm exaggerating? Sports Renault (now Spec Racer Ford) was known as Sports Rambo & we all know about Spec Pinata (Note SM was very well behaved at the RunOffs this year).

This is and has been an on and off problem for the SCCA for some time; years ago I was at a regional where Marge Binks was the Chief Steward. The Spec RX7 group were driving like buffoons, she put them on notice. Lo and behold their standards immediately improved. 

Randy Pobst (among others) worked hard to establish passing standards but at the end of the day they need to be enforced.

Rubbing is not racing at the amateur level; that is total BS. For a case in point see the 2021 F500 RunOffs race; two drivers going at it hammer and tongs while showing each other great respect.

How to fix it:

1. You need to be clear about the expectations and that over aggressive driving will not be tolerated  (even at the RunOffs). 

2. Take this out of the drivers hands; there is a culture of not wanting to protest, if there is contact (incidental or otherwise) both parties should be summoned to the stewards. (this is what happens at vintage).

3. Weed out the bad apples. Now that on board cameras are required it's much easier to sort how who did what. Those who repeatedly send it & cause crashes are not only damaging peoples cars, they're damaging your participation numbers. 

Finally:

Yes, some drivers will claim you've wussified the racing and threaten to leave but most of us would welcome the discipline. 

This is what I once told a very talented driver who had a habit of bouncing off people "you are pretty much inch perfect everywhere, well how come you can't be inch perfect when you're next to other cars?"  

rustomatic
rustomatic Reader
5/2/22 1:32 p.m.

This sounds like a case for more demolition derby events, not road racing.  It also sounds like an Atlanta freeway:  constantly unchecked (until the inevitable, spectacular wreck)/unchained aggression.  People need some outlets that do not involve driving, AKA a punching bag in the basement.  Perhaps dating without the Tinder app might add to societal balance as well . . .

drsmooth
drsmooth HalfDork
5/2/22 1:52 p.m.

Rubbin isn't racing, it leads to dissatisfied customers, and it is the sanctioning body's fault. 

Club racers are customers plain and simple. They are paying a fee to the sanctioning body to get on track.

Driving behind the pace car sucks.

Having your race shortened because someone in another group did something stupid sucks.

Having your car damaged because of someone else sucks.

Somebody with a mechanical issue that doesnt pull off to a safe spot, just so they can get a tow back to the pits in a vain attempt to get back into a 20 minute race 5 laps down sucks. 

 

Dissatisfied customers don't tend to come back. There are allot of options to get on track today, and customers will chose the one that is the best bang for their buck. 

Also, with regards to what is to blame, physics. Vehicles are designed to have far more grip than they used to and they're bigger, including wider chassis, with wider grippier rubber and the vehicles weigh more. So momentum is king as opposed to agility and transition. Thusly, power and straight line speed becomes more important and then you fall into situations due to situational awareness, mechanical failure or mass x speed portions of the equation. 

The amount of potential grip available is so much more than used to be possible, which makes changing direction at speed more difficult, as settings lean towards high speed stability. 

EDT (Forum Supporter)
EDT (Forum Supporter) Reader
5/2/22 3:40 p.m.

I believe safety is a major factor. As the sport grows safer as a whole and a larger percentage of accidents become non-issue s as far as bodily injury, there are fewer repercussions that aren't monetary. I have lived around high levels of kart racing for a while now and have seen the sport get more and more aggressive as metal bumpers transition to bigger and bigger plastic bumpers, wheels become harder to get caught together, helmets and neck braces advance, etc. The kids who advance from karts often carry these aggressive, if I can't get around you clean I'm just going to push you out of my way, mentalities into cars and you can see this issue being discussed by many series. Is it an issue of the series not policing incidents well, younger drivers being immature, or drivers who have never had to worry about crushing their heads after busting through a hay bale and straight into a concrete wall? I'm not going to say that we should make things more dangerous to reintroduce the fear of injury in a wreck, but there must be something done to curb the almost "hit the reset button and try again" method of today. In karts, push back bumpers that penalize a hit of a certain force has done quite a bit to quell the aggression, but in other ways it's just made drivers get creative with how they're going to hit someone. 

Tom1200 said:

How is it  vintage races manage to have far fewer incidents?

As far as I know, all the major vintage racing groups have a strict no-contact policy.  It seems like those specific words "strict no-contact policy" and things like the 13/13 rule are constantly reinforced and have a big psychological effect on the drivers.  As soon as you open the door that -some- contact is OK and that enforcement is somewhat arbitrary, now everything is open to interpretation and certain people will see how much they can get away with.

The other big difference with vintage racing is that it's not spec racing.  Most SCCA classes are incredibly competitive with very well matched cars, and the openings to make a pass are usually razor thin.  It doesn't take much of a judgement error to lead to an incident.

That said- yesterday some clown took out my buddy's Morgan and a 356 trying to jump the start at the HSR event.  The green flag wasn't even out and he was already caroming off of cars.  Apparently he took out another car coming back through the field during the race.  By the time they went to find him he was already packed and gone.  So apparently sometimes the rules have nothing to do with it, and it's about the individual.

I'd be curious to look at the data and see where in the pack the incidents usually take place.  My completely subjective opinion is that the frontrunners and backmarkers usually have skill and courage in somewhat equal proportion, and the mid-pack drivers often get that equation out of whack.  As a mid-pack driver myself, it's really hard not to.  You know that to make a pass you're going to take risks you're not always comfortable with.  And when being passed, you don't always recognize when the smarter play is to back out of a corner and wait for the guy to make his next mistake.  

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
2Wl5IKN5g4wGAqQdG9XFaVzRrS9iAigpKOblpnD6gqj3F4SoTLcDzZldoe4UQTFq