How about some old-school cars photographed with an old-school camera?

That looks so rad. 

Thanks! I'm still getting pleasantly surprised at how well all my photos turn out.

I'm still in the early stages of experimenting with different film types (I just got my first roll of black and white film developed), but Gold 200 is my favorite so far.

Dynamic range has entered the chat. 

Can someone explain what it is about the camera that makes them look like hot wheels in a diorama?

Epic pics btw

A large aperture (smaller f-stop number) will shorten the depth of field. 

This Nikon article explains how aperture impacts depth of field. 

Is Evanual9 talking about a depth of field aspect of the image or something else?  I'm also not sure if that shot at the start of this thread was back-focused slightly or not.  

I miss shooting film and developing my own negatives.  Should be able to again soon though, finally, which helps.

I like the photos in the real thread/article.  Gold 200 seems like a good compromise film considering contrast, saturation, color cast, and cost.  

In reply to David S. Wallens :

Thank you for that. I'm still wrapping my head around the settings.

Truth be told, I'm leaning pretty heavily on the Pentax's built-in light meter to take photos.

In reply to Colin Wood :

It's a good, simple meter. 

And there is a warmth to film that's just feels to comfortable. I recently came across some shots from college–studio work, all done on 35mm that I processed and printed–and, all these years later, they still look timeless.