Our first impressions of the Acura NSX when it debuted | #TBT

J.G.
By J.G. Pasterjak
Oct 31, 2024 | Acura, Acura NSX, #tbt | Posted in Features | From the June 2016 issue | Never miss an article

Photography Courtesy Acura

When JFK committed America to landing a man on the moon, he made the point that there are some things you have to do because they are hard, not because they represent the path of least resistance.

Welcome to Acura’s moonshot.

With the 2017 NSX, Acura shows us not only an amazing automobile but also, perhaps even more important, how it …

This content is available for GRM+ members and Grassroots Motorsports magazine subscribers only.

You can read it for free in 128 days or subscribe to GRM+ to read right now.

Subscribe now

Already a member?

Login to read

Join Free Join our community to easily find more Acura, Acura NSX and #tbt articles.
Comments
dropstep
dropstep Dork
6/16/16 10:22 a.m.

My father in law took us too honda's open house at there anna plant when they were showing this car too the employees. Not usually a honda guy but that car and some of the tech involved is awesome.

Trackmouse
Trackmouse Dork
6/16/16 10:25 a.m.

Meh. I'll wait for the type-r model...

nderwater
nderwater PowerDork
6/16/16 10:31 a.m.

Whenever I spend time around an original NSX I fall in love all over again with those cars. But for some reason, nothing about this new NSX moves me one iota. Perhaps I'll have to spend some time with it in person?

jstein77
jstein77 UltraDork
6/16/16 11:01 a.m.

Wow, jaded people.

gearheadE30
gearheadE30 Reader
6/16/16 11:03 a.m.

Yeah, I'm also in the boat of cosmetic meh-ness.

Interesting that many of the early reviews also said it wasn't that great to drive, and certainly not as a performance car. When I read the article in the magazine, I couldn't help but wonder why it was so different from what I had read elsewhere. Maybe there's an option or different tires that is just that critical to have?

Flight Service
Flight Service MegaDork
6/16/16 11:53 a.m.

JG Pasterjak
JG Pasterjak Production/Art Director
6/16/16 12:00 p.m.
gearheadE30 wrote: Yeah, I'm also in the boat of cosmetic meh-ness. Interesting that many of the early reviews also said it wasn't that great to drive, and certainly not as a performance car. When I read the article in the magazine, I couldn't help but wonder why it was so different from what I had read elsewhere. Maybe there's an option or different tires that is just that critical to have?

I just don't get it, either. The capabilities and composure of the NSX are beyond reproach, but for some reason it gets a bad rap from some reviewers as "sterile" or even boring. But a refuse to believe that you have to sacrifice some great comfort or functionality in the name of "character" for a supercar to be super. In today's modern world there's no reason a supercar can't be, well... a Honda.

GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
6/16/16 2:34 p.m.

I wouldn't say it's a competitor to the 458 but I would say it's a competitor to the i8.

z31maniac
z31maniac MegaDork
6/16/16 2:50 p.m.

I was just kind of surprised at the weight!

Bobzilla
Bobzilla UltimaDork
6/16/16 2:56 p.m.

Wait... did hte article say it was 3800lbs? 573hp and 3800lbs? Sounds like a Camaro ZL1 only 5 times as much. I don't get it. At the price point of the old NSX ($80k), that would be impressive-ish. But at $180k? It sounds just like the old NSX. Too much money, not enough performance. What's the new Z06? 3400lbs with 650hp for $80k? For that extra $100k you could have a FLEET of hybrids for the daily commute/crosscountry trek.

Once again, Honda has jumped the shark IMO.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
0SzLchRN6zzsWP0LRZ0PNGMGWt4qrcxjcPrlGIIpQEEF1U37SPlX1IP3f7ozz5TI